Judiciary Flashcards

1
Q

Give two points on why diversity is an issue in SC

A

Judges dont reflect society

Makes it hard to understand cultural context of cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give two points on why diversity is not an issue in SC

A

Application of law is neutral

Growing diversity - BAME judges up by 2% in last 2 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give three examples of lack of diversity in SC

A

Little women - 25% in court of appeal, 2 out of 12 in UKSC

Little BAME - 8% of all judges, 0 in UKSC

Little young people - average age is 65, avg age of UK is 40

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 4 key principles of the judiciary

A

Rule of Law
Judicial Independence
Judicial neutrality
Judicial impartiality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is judicial independence

A

Courts should not be subject to influence from other branches of government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is judicial impartiality/neutrality

A

Judges should be free from bias to establish the Rule of Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give 3 examples of judicial independence

A

Separation of powers - 2005 constitutional reform act made the SC the court of appeal, lord chancellor no longer head of judiciary

Judicial appointments - executive no longer had appointment power after CRA 2005

Freedom from criticism - conventions that forbid MPs from criticising court rulings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give one example of judicial neutrality

A

Anti government approach - 2002 - court ruled that the provision in the mental health act went against human rights of freedom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Name a threat to judicial neturality

A

Griffith Theory states social backgrounds impacts judges decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Name a threat to judicial independence

A

PM’s role in appointments - PM can veto appointments to the SC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened in the Miller vs Secretary state EU case

A

SC ruled that gov could not trigger Article 50 without Parliament’s approval, reinforcing parliamentary sovereignty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What happened in the Miller vs PM prorogation case

A

SC ruled that BJ want to pororgue parliament for 5 weeks was unlawful - gave parliament limited time to scutintise Brexit legislations - Parliamentary sovereignty over the executive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happened in the Begum vs Immigrant commission case

A

Shamima Begum left UK to join ISIS - stripped of citizenship - Court of appeal allowed but SC ruled she could not return to UK for appeal - showed prioritisation of collecive rights over individual rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is ultra vires

A

principle that public bodies cannot exceed the powers granted to them in law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give two examples of ultra vires

A

Miller vs BJ prorogation - PMs use of royal preogative was ultra vires

Reilly vs secretary of state 2013 - SC ruled gov acted ultra vires by making jobseekers work unpaid without legal authority - BUT - law was later changed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the importance of judicial review

A

Process where judges determine in public officials have acted ultra vires

Provides clarification of the law

17
Q

Give 2 points that the judiciary have great impact on parliament

A

CRA 2005 enhanced judicial independence

SC hears cases involving the ECHR - allowing them to rule on Acts of Parliament

18
Q

Give 2 points that the judiciary dont have great impact on parliament

A

Brexit reduced scope for judicial review - prior, judges could suspend Acts of Parliament if they breached EU law

Ministers can pass leigslation to crrect ultra vires

19
Q

Give 3 points that SC is too powerful

A

HRA means judges get involved in politics and clash with the government - e.g. - against prorogation of BJ

Judges, unlike MPs, are unelected and cannot be removed easily - judges hold office until 75 and are appointed

Judicial review means SC can enforce a legislation change to a department - Reilly case - court pushed gov to pass a retrospective law to validate its actions

20
Q

Give 3 points that SC is not too powerful

A

SC act under parliamentary sovereignty as Parliament chose to be part of the ECHR and create HRA

Judges keep independence and neutrality and are better suited than politicians who are swayed - miller brexit case shows judicial independence amongst political pressures

Rule of Law is always upheld - in BJ prorogation case was ruled unlawful which shows how even PM is under Rule of Law

21
Q

Name three threats with the SC’s growing power

A

Legislation - ability to establish precedent through common law has given “quasi legislative” power

Shift of power towards unelected judges

Separation of powers after CRA gave the SC more stature and authority in media’s eye

22
Q

Give two impacts of the SC on legislation process

A

Enforcement of EU law - Treaty of Rome gave precedence to EU law

HRA 1998 - incorporated ECHR into UK law - court can use HRA to establish common law