Judiciary Flashcards
How would a liberal justice typically act?
One who interprets the Constitution to favour liberal values such as protecting rights or advancing socially progressive policy
How would a Conservative justice typically act?
Interprets the Constitution to favour conservative values such as government authority and national security or the right to bear arms
Swing justice
falls ideologically, in the middle of the nine justices. They may change with any new appointment to the court
Public policy
Simply the policy and legislation that affects the lives of US citizens. When the SC rules to uphold or strike down a law, it invariably alters these polices and this has an impact on the people
What are the typical public policy issues?
Death penalty, abortion, affirmative action and same-sex marriage
What are the 3 potential impacts the SC has on public policy?
1) By upholding the constitutionality of a case it protects existing policy
2) By striking down the constitutionality of a case, it removes existing policy
3) Occasionally, by doing either of these, it sets entirely new policy for the whole nation
Name some cases of public policy?
Obergefell V Hodges [2015]
Texas V US [2016]
What are judicial activism and judicial restraint?
Theories that are applied to the actions of SC justices
Why might a justice think ACTIVISM is the correct approach?
- Elected branches often shy away from controversial issues as it may cost them votes
- Current problems need solutions now, and Congress is often slow to act
- Without interpretation the Constitution would become irrelevant
- Ignoring issues could lead to breaches of the Constitution and constitutional rights
Why might a justice think RESTRAINT is the correct approach?
- The SC is unelected and unaccountable, and therefore should refrain from big decisions
- No one can adequately know what the Founding Fathers intended
- Limited ways to check the Court means they should act in a limited fashion
What is the strict constructionist philosophy?
Interpret the Constitution literally with limited possibilities
What is the loose constructionist philosophy?
Interpret the constitution for many possibilities and more flexible and open
Vital UPHELD amendment in the Bill of Rights?
1st amendment and the right to free speech - even in controversial cases such as Snyder V Phelps [2011]
A CONTROVERSIAL amendment?
8th amendment - the death penalty whether ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ is truly outlawed in the USA
IN NEED OF INTERPRETATION amendment?
3rd amendment- there is no danger of the government quartering soldiers in citizens’ houses today, but could this be interpreted as a ‘right to privacy’, which does not exist in the constitution?