Judicial Review Flashcards
Are the courts concerned with the merits of a decision or its legality under judicial review?
Its legality
What is the purpose of judicial review?
Ensure that public authorities act in accordance with law
Why should authorities act in accordance with law?
It is a key component of the rule of law
What are the three main elements of judicial review?
- Are the requirements for a successful application met
- Has a ground of judicial review been established
- What is the appropriate remedy
Name the elements in considering if the requirements for a successful Judicial Review application has been met?
- Claim must be against a public body for a public law issue (i.e. not contractual) for reviewable issues that are not factual
- The correct procedure must be used
- Claim should be brought promptly and before 3 months/six weeks for planning
- The outcome if successful should change substantially
- The claimant must have standing
- It must be a last resort
Is the test for standing in judicial review of a public law matter the same as the test for judicial review in a Human Rights Matter?
No, the latter uses the victim test which is more limited
What is a public body?
Government, its departments and agencies, representatives and employees
What is the Judicial Review Pre-Action Protocol (procedure)
Claimant should send letter to defendant identifying the issues and allow 14 days for a response
What are the two stages of judicial review?
- Permission stage
- Full hearing
What is the permission stage of judicial review?
Application for permission to continue the claim for judicial review, decided on the papers and defendants response (or a hearing if matter is complex)
Court looks at standing
Will judicial review be granted if the court believes the claimant’s outcome would not change substantially?
No
What is the time limit for bringing judicial review?
Promptly
No later than 3 months from date of decision
6 weeks from a planning decision
Is judicial review available for private law issues?
No, only public law issues (procedural exclusivity)
Isa private law claim available for matters of mixed public and private law?
Yes, as this is an exception to the procedural exclusivity rule
Will a court review issues that are hypothetical or a live dispute?
No, the court will only review issues which have occured
Will a court apply judicial review to a dispute of fact?
No
What claimants have standing to bring judicial review?
Those with sufficient interest in the issues (looked at in the permission stage)
What happens if the position on standing is not obvious?
It should be considered by the court at a full hearing of the legal and factual issues of the case
When will groups or associations be granted standing?
When they are responsible, well resourced, have expertise or there is unlikely to be an alternative claimant
What must a party to before trying judicial review?
Exhaust all other remedies first
What are the grounds for judicial review?
Illegality
Procedural impropriety
Unreasonableness
Breach of legitimate expectations
Explain the illegality ground of review?
Error of law
Specific legal duty
Unlawful delegation of power
Irrelevant considerations
Ultra vires