Judicial precedent Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does judicial precedent refer to?

A
  • The source of law where law is created by the past decisions of courts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is judicial precedent also known as?

A
  • Case law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does stare decisis mean?

A
  • Stand by what has been decided
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does stare decisis ensure?

A
  • That the law is certain and fair
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the speech made at the end of the case known as?

A
  • The judgement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does ratio decidendi mean and what does it form?

A
  • Stands for the reason for deciding

- Forms the binding precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a difficulty of the judgement?

A
  • Usually in a continuous form (with no headings) therefore can be difficult to distinguish the ratio decidendi from the obiter dicta
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does obiter dicta mean and what is it?

A
  • Other things said
  • It is the remainder of the judgement
  • It is not binding precedent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What do the courts in England and Wales operate?

A
  • A rigid doctrine of precedent which has the effect that;
  • every court is bound to follow the decisions made by a court above it in the hierarchy
  • appellate courts and bound by past decisions (appeal courts)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are two exceptions in which lower courts do not have to follow decisions in appellate courts?

A
  • If it conflicts with a judgement in the ECJ

- If the decision violates human rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are appellate courts and what are some examples of them?

A
  • Courts which hear appeals
  • Court of Justice of the EU
  • Supreme court
  • Court of appeal
  • Divisional court
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the highest court?

A
  • Court of Justice of the EU
  • For European law, a decision made by ECJ is binding in all courts
  • However Supreme Court is most senior for laws not affected by European law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the two divisions of the Court of Appeal?

A
  • Civil and criminal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 3 courts of divisional courts?

A
  • QBD
  • Chancery
  • Family
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is meant by “court of first instance”?

A
  • Any court where original trial of case is heard
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What do appellate courts hear?

A
  • Appeals not trials
17
Q

What are inferior courts and what to they have to do?

A
  • Inferior courts are courts such as the Crown, County and Magistrate’s court
  • Bound to follow decisions of higher courts
18
Q

What is the main debate in regards to the SC?

A
  • Whether they should follow its own past decisions

- The ideas on this have changed over years

19
Q

What was determined by the HL in the case of London Street Tramways v London County Council 1898?

A
  • Certainty in the law was more important than any possible hardship to an individual caused by past decisions
20
Q

What happened in 1898-1966?

A
  • SC regarded itself as being completely bound by its own past decisions
21
Q

Why was bounding itself by past decisions unsatisfactory?

A
  • Because law could not alter to meet the changing social conditions, nor could “wrong” decisions be changed by the courts
22
Q

What was issues in 1966 by the Lord Chancellor?

A
  • A practice statement that announced a change to the law in London Street Tramways
23
Q

What did this practice statement allow the HL to do?

A
  • Depart from previous decisions “when it appeared right to do so”
24
Q

What was the first case in which the practice statement was used?

A
  • Conway v Rimmer but first MAJOR case was Herrington v British Railways Board 1972
25
Q

What is a case in which the HL were reluctant to use the practice statement?

A
  • Jones v Secretary of state for social services 1972
26
Q

When did the HL become more willing to use the practice statement?

A
  • From the mid 1970s

- E.g. Pepper and Hart 1993

27
Q

What was the first criminal case to use the practice statement?

A
  • R v Shivpuri 1986
28
Q

What occurred in october 2009?

A
  • House of lords was replaced by the supreme court

- In case of Austin v London Borough of Southwark 2010, SC confirmed practice statement still applied

29
Q

What are both divisions in the court of appeal bound by?

A
  • Decisions of the court above it
30
Q

What are the rules of the courts of appeal in regards to their past decisions?

A
  • Rule 1, decisions by one division do not bind other division
  • Rule 2, with each division decisions are normally binding (Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd 1944)
31
Q

When can the criminal division refuse to follow their past decisions?

A
  • If law has been misapplied or misunderstood

- If a person’s liberty is at stake (R v Taylor 1950)

32
Q

What is meant by binding precedent and why is it created?

A
  • Precedent from earlier case which must be followed

- Only created when material of facts of second case are sufficiently similar to original case

33
Q

What is persuasive precedent?

A
  • Precedent which is not binding but judge may consider and decide to follow it
34
Q

What was a case in which courts lower in hierarchy used persuasive precedent?

A
  • R v R 1991

- HL followed CA judge when he decided a man can be guilty of raping his wife

35
Q

How is obiter dicta relevant to persuasive precedent?

A
  • Judges sometimes follow comments made in obiter dicta e.g. R v Howe 1987
36
Q

What is meant by dissenting judgements?

A
  • Decision has been made by a majority, judges who dissented/disagreed will have explained their reasons