Judicial Discretion Flashcards

1
Q

What is meant by Probative Value?

A

The extent to which the evidence could rationally affect the assessment of the probability of the existence of a fact in issue: dictionary of the EA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does R v SHAMOUIL say about probative value?

A

that evidence has probative value if it is capable of supporting a verdict of guilty

probative value is determined by taking evidence at its highest (except where evidence is so incredible (R v BAuer))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is meant by ‘Unfair’?

A
  1. Evidence that will be misused R v XY

2. It is to be determined in all the circumstances Haines v R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is not ‘unfair’?

A

Evidence is not unfair just because it supports the prosecution case R v XY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is ‘unfair prejudice’?

A
  1. Is harm to the interests of the accused by reason of a risk that evidence will be used improperly in some unfair way R v BAUER
  2. Jury likely to give it more weight than they should.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is not ‘unfair prejudice’?

A

Evidence is not unfair merely because it strengthens the prosecution case. Festa v R.

  • unreliable identification evidence
  • evidence with multiple interpretations
  • evidence from a witness who’s memory has faded
  • weak evidence which is used as ‘strands in a cable’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the case of Festa v R say?

A

Evidence is not unfair merely because it strengthens the prosecution case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does section 135 say about misleading or confusing statements?

A

The Court MAY refuse to admit evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger that the evidence might:

  • be unfairly prejudicial to a party
  • be misleading or confusing
  • cause or result in undue waste of time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the onus and test for 135?

A

Onus: objecting party
Test: probative value must substantially outweigh
Focus: how will it be used
Standard: balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the remedies to 135?

A

Give a warning, excise unfair portions, if warnings cannot cure then limit the evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does section 137 state about unfair prejudice?

A

In a criminal proceeding the court MUST refuse to admit evidence adduced by the prosecutor if its probative value is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the onus and test for 137?

A

Onus: defence
Test: probative value outweighed (by any amount) danger of unfair prejudice
Focus: how will it be used
Standard: balance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the difference between s135 and s137?

A

135 is a MAY exclude test. 137 is a MUST exclude test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does section 138 state about impropriety or illegality?

A

Evidence that was obtained improperly or in contravention of the law is not to be admitted unless the desirability of admitting the evidence outweighs the undesirability of admitting evidence that has been obtained in the way in which the evidence was obtained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who bears the onus under s 138?

A

The onus is on the objecting party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What should the prosecution argue to get evidence back in under section 138(3)?

A
  1. probative value of evidence
  2. importance of evidence
  3. nature of the relevant offence
  4. gravity of the impropriety
  5. whether proceedings will follow for the contravention

All items need to be considered and none should be given more weight than others. ASIC v MCDonald

17
Q

Should an officers intent be considered under s 138?

A

it needs to be reckless at least. So an officer honest but mistaken entitlement to act is not recklessness. R v Gallagher.

18
Q

What is the onus/test for 138?

A

Onus: alleging party
Test: by or in consequence of impropriety or illegality
Focus: how it was obtained
Standard: balance

19
Q

What is section 90?

A

unfair admissions

20
Q

What is section 135?

A

unfair prejudice

21
Q

What is section 136?

A

limit use of evidence

22
Q

What is section 137?

A

unfair prejudice

23
Q

What is section 138?

A

Improper or Illegally obtained evidence

24
Q

What are the remedies available?

A

warnings, excise portions, limit evidence, refuse to admit evidence