Joining Claims & Parties Flashcards
Interpleader?
Interpleader allows a property holder (stakeholder) to initiate a suit to compel multiple claimants to that property to litigate the dispute. (Rule 22 and Statutory)
Rule 22 Interpleader
- Complete diversity required: Stakholder must be diverse from all claimants; amount in controversy must exceed $75K
- Service of process and venue requirements are the same as for any other fed. case
Statutory Interpleader
- Diversity requirement: One claimant must be diverse from at least one other claimant (Amount in controversy must be $500 or more)
- Nationwide Jx: Service is proper on anyone in the US
- Venue is proper in any district where any claimant resides
Interpleader Example
Deceased had life insurance policy with DE corp. having PPB in CA; claimants from NJ, NV & CA all claim interests.
Rule 22 interpleader: improper b/c lack of diversity
Statutory interpleader: proper b/c claimants from different states.
Intervention?
A non party absentee may seek to join (i.e., intervene) in an already pending suit, either as a P or D
Intervention as a right
Must be allowed if either:
a) Absentee’s interest will be harmed if not joined and no existing party will adequately represent that interest, or
b) Absentee has an unconditional statutory right
Permissive intervention
Allowed in court’s discretion if either:
a) Absentee has a claim or defense that shares a common question of law with the underlying action;
b) Absentee has a conditional statutory right, or
c) Absentee is a govt. officer or agency and an existing claim or defense relates to the officer/agency or a statute, regulation, etc.
Court must also consider whether intervention will unduly delay or prejudice adjudication of original parties’ right
Jurisdiction (Intervention)
- In diversity cases, intervenes must establish independent SMJ
- Supplemental Jx will not cover diversity intervention
Intervention vs. Compulsory joinder
- Compulsory joinder forces absentee into suit; narrow; must be very necessary for the court to force an absentee into a case
- Intervention lets absentee join suit voluntarily; more lenient
Impleader?
Impleader allows D to join a non-party who may be liable to D for all or part of the claim brought by P against the original D (i.e., D brings in another D may be liable to D for P’s harm)
-Allows D to assert claims for indemnity, contribution, etc. against another party for the claim D is defending
Effect & terminology (Impleader)
Original D becomes a P
- Newly joined party is a third-party D (TPD)
- Original D becomes third-party p (TPP)
Requirements (Impleader)
- D may implead a (third party D) TPD by filing a third-party complaint within 14 days after serving her answer (after 14 days D must get permission from court)
- D’s claims under impleader must be derivative (D/TPP cannot claim that TPD is solely liable to P)
- Jurisdiction: Court must have PJ over impleaded party; court will generally have supplemental Jx
Additional claims involving TPD (Impleader)
- Once TPD is joined, TPD may make claims of her own against other parties as long as SMJ exists over each claim (SMJ will eventually exist through supplemental Jx)
- Original P may assert claims against TPD arising from the same transaction or occurrence as P’s original claims against D/TPP
Compulsory Joinder?
Absent parties may be forced to join a case if they are deemed necessary parties
What is a necessary party?
Absentees are necessary when either:
a) Without absentee, court cannot grant complete relief (Consider whether multiple suits might follow if absentee is not made a party)
b) Absentee has a legal interest that may be impaired or impeded or
c) Absentee has an interest that creates a risk of multiple or inconsistent ruling and obligations