Joining Claims & Parties Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Interpleader?

A

Interpleader allows a property holder (stakeholder) to initiate a suit to compel multiple claimants to that property to litigate the dispute. (Rule 22 and Statutory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rule 22 Interpleader

A
  • Complete diversity required: Stakholder must be diverse from all claimants; amount in controversy must exceed $75K
  • Service of process and venue requirements are the same as for any other fed. case
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Statutory Interpleader

A
  • Diversity requirement: One claimant must be diverse from at least one other claimant (Amount in controversy must be $500 or more)
  • Nationwide Jx: Service is proper on anyone in the US
  • Venue is proper in any district where any claimant resides
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Interpleader Example

A

Deceased had life insurance policy with DE corp. having PPB in CA; claimants from NJ, NV & CA all claim interests.
Rule 22 interpleader: improper b/c lack of diversity
Statutory interpleader: proper b/c claimants from different states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Intervention?

A

A non party absentee may seek to join (i.e., intervene) in an already pending suit, either as a P or D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intervention as a right

A

Must be allowed if either:

a) Absentee’s interest will be harmed if not joined and no existing party will adequately represent that interest, or
b) Absentee has an unconditional statutory right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Permissive intervention

A

Allowed in court’s discretion if either:
a) Absentee has a claim or defense that shares a common question of law with the underlying action;
b) Absentee has a conditional statutory right, or
c) Absentee is a govt. officer or agency and an existing claim or defense relates to the officer/agency or a statute, regulation, etc.
Court must also consider whether intervention will unduly delay or prejudice adjudication of original parties’ right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Jurisdiction (Intervention)

A
  • In diversity cases, intervenes must establish independent SMJ
  • Supplemental Jx will not cover diversity intervention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Intervention vs. Compulsory joinder

A
  • Compulsory joinder forces absentee into suit; narrow; must be very necessary for the court to force an absentee into a case
  • Intervention lets absentee join suit voluntarily; more lenient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Impleader?

A

Impleader allows D to join a non-party who may be liable to D for all or part of the claim brought by P against the original D (i.e., D brings in another D may be liable to D for P’s harm)
-Allows D to assert claims for indemnity, contribution, etc. against another party for the claim D is defending

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Effect & terminology (Impleader)

A

Original D becomes a P

  • Newly joined party is a third-party D (TPD)
  • Original D becomes third-party p (TPP)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Requirements (Impleader)

A
  • D may implead a (third party D) TPD by filing a third-party complaint within 14 days after serving her answer (after 14 days D must get permission from court)
  • D’s claims under impleader must be derivative (D/TPP cannot claim that TPD is solely liable to P)
  • Jurisdiction: Court must have PJ over impleaded party; court will generally have supplemental Jx
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Additional claims involving TPD (Impleader)

A
  • Once TPD is joined, TPD may make claims of her own against other parties as long as SMJ exists over each claim (SMJ will eventually exist through supplemental Jx)
  • Original P may assert claims against TPD arising from the same transaction or occurrence as P’s original claims against D/TPP
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Compulsory Joinder?

A

Absent parties may be forced to join a case if they are deemed necessary parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a necessary party?

A

Absentees are necessary when either:

a) Without absentee, court cannot grant complete relief (Consider whether multiple suits might follow if absentee is not made a party)
b) Absentee has a legal interest that may be impaired or impeded or
c) Absentee has an interest that creates a risk of multiple or inconsistent ruling and obligations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Requirement (Compulsory Joinder)

A

Absentee can be joined as a necessary party if:
1) There is PJ over the absentee; and
2) Joining the absentee will not destroy diversity
Otherwise, dismiss

17
Q

what is an Indispensable party?

A

If a necessary party cannot be joined, ask whether the party is so indispensable that the case should be dismissed.

18
Q

Factors for a party to be considered indispensable?

A

1) Is an alternative forum available
2) What is the likelihood of prejudice to the parties or others if the case goes forward?
3) Can the court shape potential relief to avoid prejudice?
4) Would P have an adequate remedy if the case is dismissed?

19
Q

Permissive Joinder?

A

Under permissive joinder, P seeks to join non-parties as co-Ps or co-Ds

20
Q

Permissive Joinder: Joining additional Ps and D

A
  • Joining additional Ps: Relies on their willingness to join (ie. non-party that P seeks to join as Co-P must agree to join
  • Joining additional Ds: Lies in the hand of the P (i.e. non-party that P seeks to join as Co-D cannot refuse
21
Q

Requirements for permissive joinder

A

Allowed when:

1) Same transaction or occurrence: Joined parties assert a right to relief arising from the same transaction or occurrence as P’s claim (Ds may be joined if right to relief asserted against them arises from same transaction or occurrence)
2) Common question of law or fact There is a common question of law or fact in the joined parties’ claims or claims against them (e.g. after bus accident, all injured passengers and bystanders join as Ps: common issue is driver’s negligence; other issues (e.g. damages) are tried individually each P

22
Q

Jurisdiction on permissive joinder

A

Court must have Jx over joined parties and claims

23
Q

Permissive Joinder vs. Impleader

A

Impleader which involves joinder of non-parties by D, whereas permissive joinder involves joinder of non-parties by P