JOINDER Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who may exercise joinder of claims?

A

A party who asserts a claim, counter claim, or cross claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many claims may a party join?

A
  • An unlimited number of additional claims
  • AGAINST AN OPPOSING PARTY
  • So long as the elements are met.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Joinder of Claims - Elements

A
  1. FRCP allows joinder because claim is either (a) an additional claim by a party against an opposing party (Rule 18) OR (b) a compulsory permissive claim, counterclaim, or cross claim, (Rule 13)*, and
  2. The court has SMJ (FQ, DJ, SJ)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rule 13 - Compulsory Counter Claim Rule and Elements

A

A compulsory counterclaim must be asserted. A counterclaim is compulsory if:

  1. arises out of the same transaction or occurrence that is the subject of the OP’s claim, and
  2. does not require joinder of a party over which the court does not have PJ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rule 13 - Permissive Counter Claims

A

A permissive counter claim is any claim that is not compulsory. No limit on permissive counterclaims that are JOINABLE.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rule 13 - Cross Claims

A
  • A cross claim is a claim between coparties.
  • May be permissively joined when they
  • Arose out of the same events that are the basis of the complaint or counterclaim.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Counter Claims and Joinder

A
  • Compulsory counter claims will fall within the court’s supplemental jurisdiction because of the “common nucleus of operative fact” t/o analysis.
  • Permissive counter claims will never fall within the court’s supplemental jurisdiction because they do not share the same common nucleus of operative fact; do not arise out of the same t/o.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Joinder - definition

A

The joining together of claims or parties to one lawsuit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Joinder - Diversity/Supplemental Jurisdiction

A
  • The 1367 limitation on supplemental jurisdiction in diversity cases applies only to Plaintiffs. - So, as long as the counterclaims, crossclaims, or third party claims brought by a Defendant share a common nucleus of operative fact with OJ claims, then SMJ will be proper for diversity purposes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who may exercise Joinder of Parties?

A
  • Additional plaintiffs can join
  • Plaintiffs can seek to join additional defendants
  • Defendants can join third parties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Joinder of Parties - Elements

A
  1. Personal Jurisdiction over every D unless D waived
  2. Same transaction or occurrence
  3. Substantial question of common law or fact

*generally, if claims arise out of same t/o then there will be a substantial question of common law or fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Permissive Joinder of Parties - Rule 20

A

Same Rule as permissive joinder of claims

  • Any claim that is not compulsory.
  • Not arise under same t/o.
  • No limit on parties who are JOINABLE (meets the elements)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Permissive Joinder mnemonic

A

Parties (personal Jurisdiction)
That (transaction/occurrence)
Satisfy (substantial question or fact common to existing claim)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Joinder of Parties - Compulsory Joinder Rule 19

A

If a person is required to join or be joined in a lawsuit, the court must order him to be joined either as a defendant or involuntary plaintiff. Compulsory joinder is only required when the party is a necessary party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Compulsory Joinder of Parties - Jurisdictional Obstacles

A

If jurisdictional obstacles prevent joinder, court must consider (1) whether to move forward in party’s absence or (2) dismiss the entire case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Compulsory Joinder of Parties - Elements

A

A joinder of a party is compulsory if:

  1. Personal jurisdiction over each D joined unless waived.
  2. The joinder does not deprive court of SMJ
  3. Person to be joined is a Necessary Party*
17
Q

Compulsory Joinder of Parties - Mnemonic

A

Parties (personal jurisdiction)
Share (SMJ)
Needs (necessary party)*

18
Q

Necessary Party

A
  1. Persons whose absence will mean that court cannot grant complete relief; or
  2. Persons who claim interest related to the action and whose absence (a) may impair ability to protect interest or (b) subject existing party to substantial risk of incurring liability
19
Q

Compulsory Joinder of Parties - Indispensable Party Rule

A
  1. If necessary party cannot be joined, court must decide whether person is indispensable* party.
  2. If not indispensable, court will move forward.
  3. If indispensable, court will dismiss
20
Q

Compulsory Joinder of Parties. - Indispensable Party*

A

Court considers factors to determine whether party indispensable:

  1. extent judgment may prejudice party
  2. extent prejudice could be reduced or avoided by judgment
  3. whether judgment would be adequate
  4. whether P would have adequate remedy if dismissed
21
Q

Impleader Rules 14 and 18 - Definition

A

Impleader involves the procedure of a third party complaint which joins both a new party and new claim.

22
Q

Impleader Elements

A
  1. Third party is joinable*
  2. Filing is timely (14 days after serving answer or other pleading)
  3. Personal jurisdiction (100-mile bulge rule)
  4. Subject matter jurisdiction (D filing- court will have supplemental; P-cannot destroy complete diversity in diversity cases)
  5. Venue (P only-venue must lie in which a P is bringing 3rd party complaint in response to counterclaim)