JIAR China 2016 Flashcards
Companies who use U.S. GAAP are not allowed to
report property, plant, and equipment (PPE) at amounts greater than historical cost
Companies in the European Union (EU) and other countries using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) may choose to report assets on
the balance sheet at either historical cost or fair value
Those Chinese companies following Chinese GAAP must use the
direct method in preparing the statement of cash flows, whereas most companies in the United States and the EU use the indirect method.
Both U.S. GAAP and Japanese GAAP stipulate that research and development costs must be
expensed as incurred, whereas IFRS requires development costs to be capitalized as an intangible asset when certain conditions are met.
In a typical reverse merger (RM), a private operating company, either from the U.S. or abroad,
merges with a “shell” U.S. company
Upon consummation of the merger, the private company becomes
a wholly owned subsidiary of the shell company; can be traded in the U.S. securities market if the shell company is publicly listed.
Since an RM avoid an underwriter, it could potentially allow companies to
go public in the U.S. more quickly and in a a less expensive manner than a traditional IPO
Critics point out that RMs allow companies to go public with
less scrutiny of their financial situations, exposing investors to risk
Concerns on RMs
-the use of small audit firms that might not have the resources to meet auditing obligations when all or substantially all private company’s operations are in another country; causing them to miss non compliance with relevant accounting standards.
-audit quality
In 2011 the SEC passed
new rules tightening the standards that RMs needed to meet for listing on the major exchanges that would provide greater protections for investors
SEC New Rules
- require RMs to be traded in the U.S. over the counter or on another regulated U.S. or foreign exchange for at least one year and
-meet minimum share price requirements before it can be publicly listed on the NYSE, NASDAQ, or NYSE Amex
A comparison of domestic and foreign firms that undertake RMs reveals
no systematic difference in earnings management between the U.S. and non-U.S. RM companies
Risk considered with RMs
-Domestic RM firms show potentially questionable accounting practices
-Focus on foreign firms as risky investments has been too narrow and ignored Domestic RM firms
-caution should be expanded
-Domestic and foreign RMs engage in Earnings Management
RMs that use Big 4 auditors (higher quality auditors) are associated with
lower Earnings Management
RM firms that use Big 4 auditors are associated with significantlly
lower rates of failure (delistin) in the years following the reverse merger; equal to almost half of the failure rate of RM firms that do not employ a Big 4 auditor