Jervis vs Harris Clause Flashcards
What is a Jervis vs Harris clause?
A self help remedy available in the lease where the landlord is entitled to exercise a right of re-entry and then undertake the repair work and recover the costs from the tenant.
What 4 rights does a Jervis vs Harris clause give?
- Right to enter and inspect the condition
- Serve notice on the tenant requiring them to undertake repair work
- If the tenant does not undertake the work, the LL will have a right to enter and undertake the work stipulated in the notice.
- Recover the costs from the tenant as a debt.
What are the advantages of a Jervis vs Harris clause?
- No need for a S146 notice
- Bypass legislation where the tenant could claim the benefit of the Leasehold Property Repairs Act 1938 and also the cap on a claim to the diminution in value under Landlord and Tenant Act 1927.
- Works controlled by the landlord
What are the disadvantages of a Jervis vs Harris clause?
- Landlord has to spend the money first and then pursue the tenant for the debt
- Risk for a claim of trespass if the conditions of re-entry has not been complied with
When could a landlord be considering trespassing?
If they have served an invalid notice. i.e. exaggerated the item in disrepair or misinterpreted the repair covenant.
What should a landlord do prior to exercising their right to re-enter and undertake the work themselves?
Serve notice on the tenant, specifying
- The breaches
- Timeframe to put it right
Should a landlord specifying the remedy within the notice?
No because there can be more than one way to remedy a breach and specifying a remedy may invalidate the notice.