JC 80 Flashcards
wisdom
WEUZ
your
*RBG or KWRAOUR
emphasis
EPLSZ
justice
SKWRUFT
not guilty
TPH-G
satisfied
SAED
presumption
PRUPLGS
reconcile
RAOEULS
consistent
KEPBT
this means
TH*PLZ
person
PERN
who has been
WHO\SHAB or
WHOFPBLTD (WHO-FNLTD)
you must
*UMS
find
FIND
unless
N-LS
find a
TPAEND (FAEND)
conflict
KWHREUBGT
the defendant’s
TK*FTSZ
you should
URBD
do so
TKAOS
concept
SKEPT
charged with a crime
KH-RPL
overcome
OEFRBG
gentlemen of the jury
SKWREPBLG
evaluating
SRAELT/G
first
TP*EUR (F*IRS) or
TP*EURS
decide
STKAEUD
whether
WHR
restated
RE/STAEUTD
at trial
TRAO*EUL
second
SEBGD
accurately
KRALT
statement
STAEUPLT
deciding
STKAOEUD/G
weight
WA*EUT
all of the
AUFT
jurors
SKWRAOURZ
trustworthy
TWO*ERT or
TRO*ERT
participation
PARPGS
paying attention
PAEUPBGDZ
upon
POPB
that you must
THA*UPLS
reaching
RAOEFPG
the State
#STAEUT
charges
KHARPBLGZ
trespass
TR-P
dwelling
TKWELG
proved
PRAO*UFD
beyond a reasonable doubt
YA*RD
elements
HR-PLTS
from the
FR-T
presented
PREPBTD
did so
TK/SO
without the
WOUTD
consent
SKEPBT
someone
SWUPB
lawfully
HRA*UFL
dwelling
TKWELG
entry
SPWREU
under
URPBD
conditions
K-PBZ
create
KRAET
provoke
PRO*EFBG
break of peace
PWRAEUPS
violations
SRAOEULGSZ
peace
PAES or PAO*ES
place
PHRAEUS
on the
O-T
evidence
*EFD
merely
PHAOERL
the testimony
#TEFT
one
WUN
entitled
SPWAOEUD
than that
THAPBLGTS
witnesses
W-PBSZ
examined
KP-D
rule of law
RAOUFRL
your duty
STKAO*UT
you will
UL
all the
AULT
during
TKURG
interest
SPW
outcome
OUPLT (OUT-M)
consideration
K-RGS
demeanor
DM-EERN
witness stand
SW-PBS
bias
PW-AOEU-S
either
ERT
recollection
REBGZ
this case
TKHRAEUS
of this case
K-FTSDZ
determine
DERP
as you find
SUFD
function
TPUBGZ
impartial
IM/BASHL or
KPWARBL
consequence(s)
SKW*ENS(Z)
KONS/KWENSZ
to their
TO-BLS
notice
NOE
all of
AUF
give
TKPW*EUF
such
SUFP
as you
S*U
entitled
SPWAOD
under
URPBD
witness
W-PBS
do not
TKAOPBT
discredit
SKREUT or
STKREUT
version
SRERGS
what happened
WHA-PD
you should
URBD
each
AOEFP
solely
SL/L or
SO*L
bears
PWAEURZ
credibility
KREUBLT
as a
SA*
convict / convicted / convicting / conviction
KWIKT/ KWIKTD/ KW*EUBGT/ KWEUBGZ
of an
-FPB
offense
O-FPBS
some
SOPL
complaint
KPHRAUEPBT
his or her
HO*R
nothing
TPHOG
accusation
SKAEUGS
against
TKPWEPBS
from
TPR-
time
TAOEUPL
during
TKURG
sustained
STAEPBD
objection
OBGZ
if the
TP-T
implied
KPWHRAOEUD
ignore
TKPWOERPB
implication
KPWHREUBGZ
Relationship
RAEPLGS or
RE*UP (p 377)
during the
TKURGT
remarks
RARBGS
arguments
ARGTS
existence
KPEUPBS (XINS)
has been
SHAB
within
W-PB
such
SUFP
moment
PHOEPLT
I am
EUPL
submit
SPHEUT
in question
TPH*FP
in a
TPHa
condition
K-PB
claimed
KHRAEUPLD
by him
PW*EUFRP
at which time
KHEUPLT
the plaintiff
PHR-FT
damage
TKAPBLG
delivery
TKHRA*EUFR (deliver + A)
TKHR*EUFR/AOE
negligence
TPHEPBLGS
could not
KAOPBT
claims
KHRAEUPL
to have
TO*F
incurred
KRURD
certain
SERPB
sustained
STAEPBD
reason
RAOEPB
plaintiff’s
PHR*FZ
included
KHRU
profits
PROFTS
from the
TPR-T
items
TUPLZ
purchase(d)
PR-FP(D)
proper
PRORP
condition
K-PB
represented
REPTD
losses
HROSZ
he knew
EFPB
entry
SPWREU
must have
PH*UF
determine
TKERP
event
*EFPBT or
AO*EFNT
acts
ABGTS
bearing
PWAEURG
on her
O*ER
intent
SPWEPBT
Entered
SPWERD
Presented
PRENTD
May not
PHA*EUPBT
Becomes
B-MS
as to the
STO*T
In other words
TPHOERDZ
Must not be
PHUPBT/B
Influenced
FLUD
Mannerisms
PHARN/EUFPLZ
disbelieve
STKBLEEV
solely
S-L/L
It has
T-FPLTD
already
HR-R
You may
UMG
You may
UMG
You are the
-URT
sole judges
SO-JZ
Reasonable doubt
R-D
Unanimous
NANS
Closing arguments
KLOE FGTS
By the court
KBITD (“by the + K-)
sympathy
STHI or
SP-
Judges of the facts
SKWRFKT(S)
after such
STPUFP
Denied
D-ND
punitive damages
PAOUJZ
realize(d)
*RL(D)
ignorance
GO(E)RNS
surround(ing)
SROUNGD
combination
KBINGS
discover(ing)
SKO*FR(G)
opening statements
OEPGSZ
schizophrenia
STPR-EPB
diagnosis
TK-GS
abuse
BAOUZ
sexual abuse
SEBS
drug abuse
TKRUBS
competency
KPAENS
insane
STPHAEUPB
ancestry
SA*ERS or S*EURS
personal knowlege
PEJ
virtually
SR*EURLT
videotape
SROEPD
domestic
DO*MS or
DMEFK
domestic violence
TK*FS or
TK*FNS
attendant
TA*END
defraud
TKPWRAUD or
TKWRA*UD
devise
TKWAOEUZ
obtain
OBT
dominion
TKPHOEUB
constructive
SKR*UFBGT
counterfeit
KOUFT
young
KWRUNG
adult
TKULT
self-defense
STKWENS
mischief
M*IFPS
imminent
MAENT
danger
TKAEURNG
as long as
SLONGZ
might be
PHAOEUB
scrutinize
SKRAOUNZ
discrepancy
SKREP
inconsistent/ inconsistency
K*ENTD / K*ENS
solemn
SLEM
proof
PRAOF
whatsoever
WHAO*FRS
right to remain silent
RAOEURMS
yourself/yourselves
KWRAOURS(Z)
permissible
PERBLS
conjecture
KERJT
virtue
SRIRT
illustration / illustrate
ILGS / *ILS
observation(s)
OEB / OEBGZ
compel
KPEL
essential
SERBL
bodily injury
BOEJ
insofar as
STPHOFRZ
I may have
*EUFM
rely / rely on
R*L / RO*L
each and every
KH(A)*EFR
nevertheless
N*EFRLS or
*FRPBLS
sworn testimony
SWORNT
substance abuse
SUBS/BAOUZ or
?
accompany
KPAO or
A/KP
overview
SRO*EFR
substantial
SUBLS or
STARBL
manifest / manifesting / manifestation
MA*EFS / MA*EFGS / MAEFGS
deviate / deviation
TKAO*EFGS
human being
HAOUK
may or may not
MAEURNT X 2 or
MAEURPBT
pay attention
PAEUPBGS
alibi
A*L/BAOEU
breaking and entering
BRAEUNGT
abandon
PW AOND
experiment(s)
SPERMT(S)
persuasion
P*ERGS
interpret
SPWERPT
judicial
JISHL
personal property
PROERPBL (personal + R-O) or
PRERPBL (personal + R-)
in effect
NEFKT
efficient
TPEURBT
involve(d)
VOFL(D)
obligate(d)
BLIT or
BLIG or
OBLGT(D)
avoid(ing)
SRAO(G)D
width
W*EUTD
corrections officer
KREFRS
law enforcement officer
LAUFRT
dominion
DMOIN
serious bodily injury
SB-J
lethal
LAO*ELT
faculty (ies)
FULT(S)
elect
LAEKT
plead(ed)
PLAOE(T)D
in any way
NAE
existence or nonexistence
KPEURPBS (existence + R)
indifference
SPWEUFRS
significant bodily injury
SB-OEJ
reasonable person
PR-AOEPBL (P + reasonable)
imaginary
MA*IRJ (major + *)
litigation
LIGS
attach
TA-FP
impeach(ed)
KPW AOE FP(D)
imprisonment
KPWROMT
laboratory
LABT
capacity
KPAFT
Louisiana
LAOUNZ
consortium
SKORM
preexisting
PR*EUGS
companionship
KP*EUP
aggravate(d)
A*FT(D)
persuade(d)
PAEFR(T)D or
PEFRT(D)
heard
-FRPLD or
HERD
none
NON
voice
SROEUS
incumbent
KBENT
jurisprudence
J-PS
prerogative
PRO*FGT
probative
PRO*EFB(T)
previous(ly)
PRAO*EF(L)S
reply
PLI
summation
SMAEUGS
rebuttal
PWU LGTS or
RU LGTS
guidance
TKPW AOEU NS
whereas
WRAZ
foreseen
FOERNS
proceed / proceeded / proceedings
PROE / PROED / PROEGZ
greater weight of the evidence
GR-FD
directly / indirectly
DREL / DR*EL
describe (d)
STKRAOEUB(D)
questions and answers
KWANSZ
petition
PEGS
superior
SPR-R
contention(s)
KOEPBGS
except
KPEP(T)
convenience / inconvenience
KWAOENS / KWAO*ENS
one or more
W*URPL
psychosis
SKOESZ
pursue
PAOURS
accomplice
PL*EUS
corroborate(d)
KROBT(D)
satisfactory
SAER