ITCLR Flashcards

1
Q

What are the facts of Esso v Customs and Excise

A

Esso did a promotion saying if you buy a gallon of petrol you will be given a World Cup coin to collect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was held in Esso v Customs and Excise

A

ITCLR as there was a commercial gain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the facts of Balfour v Balfour

A

C and D were married and D gave C a cheque and orally promised to give £30 a month. Eventually they separated and C still wanted the monthly payments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was held in Balfour v Balfour

A

No ITCLR as they were married and together when the agreement was made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the facts of Merritt v Merritt

A

They separated and Mr Merritt agreed to pay Mrs Merritt £40 a month and signed a document

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was held in Merritt v Merritt

A

ITCLR as they were separated and the agreement was written down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was held in Snelling v Snelling

A

ITCLR if family members are in business together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the facts of Buckpitt v Oates

A

Arrangement between 18 year olds to give each other a lift to work and promise to contribute to petrol

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was held in Buckpitt v Oates

A

No ITCLR as shared lifts and shared money was not even to warrant an intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the facts of Simpkins v Pays

A

Ms Pays granddaughter won a prize £750 under Ms Pays name and she refused to give the money over so Ms Simpkins claimed for 1/3 of the money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was held in Simpkins v Pays

A

ITCLR as money was involved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the facts of Wilson v Burnett

A

2 women reached an oral agreement of if any of them won more than £10 in bingo they would share the winnings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was held in Wilson v Burnett

A

No ITCLR as casual conversations can’t be elevated into binding agreements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the facts of Parker v Clark

A

Mrs Parker and her husband moved in with her niece (Mrs Clark) so they sold their home and moved in. The Clark’s told the Parker’s that they would have to move out because the arrangement wasn’t working

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was held in Parker v Clark

A

ITCLR as the Parkers gave up their financial security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the facts of Sadler v Reynolds

A

Sadler agrees he had an oral agreement with Reynolds to ghost write Mr Reynolds autobiography

17
Q

What was held in Sadler v Reynolds

A

Situations which fall into a ‘halfway house’ between domestic and commercial agreements

18
Q

What are the facts of Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball

A

Advert that’s said if the purchaser bought a smoke ball and used it correctly and still got the flu then they would give them £100

19
Q

What was held in Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball

A

ITCLR as they deposited money which shows intention

20
Q

What are the facts of McGowan v Radio Buxton

A

C entered a radio competition and the prize was a Renault Clio car and the winner got a 4 inch model of the car

21
Q

What was held in McGowan v Radio Buxton

A

There was ITCLR

22
Q

What are the facts of Edward’s v Skyways

A

C was an airline pilot working for D and was made redundant. D said if he withdrew his contributions to the pension fund then they would pay him the equivalent in ex gratia payment

23
Q

What was held in Edward’s v Skyways

A

The agreement suggested a legal intention to pay and the words ex gratia were irrelevant