ITC Flashcards
Clause 4
Termination
Clause 6
Perils
Clause 8
3/4ths Collision Liability
Clause 9
Sisterships
Clause 10
Notice of claim and tenders
Clause 11
General Average and Salvage
Clause 12
Deductibles & recoveries
AAA Special Committee Report
(a) one deductible is to be applied when either:
i) there is only one accident or occurrence form which the claims arise, or
ii) Even though there is more than one accident or occurrence, these form a connected set of events from which the claims arise.
(b) However, if one or more of the events from which the claims arise are the result of a new cause, which would be considered a Novus actus interveniens, then more than one deductible is to be applied to the claims.
- Cases involving the application of one deductible.
A vessel is moored at a port where it is customary to lie safely aground at low tide. Vessel sustains damage due to ranging at each tide during one period of heavy weather lasting for several days. The damage all flows from one peril insured - the stress of weather over one period, comprising one accident.
- Cases involving the application of more than one deductible.
A vessel is proceeding through a dock system with tug assistance. As she is about to enter, she is caught by the wind and collides with one of her tugs, sustaining damage. While in a lock later in the system the water is let in too rapidly, she surges and again collides with a tug sustaining damage. In this case, there is no connecting link between each contact, with each contact due to quite separate causes. Therefore, two deductibles to be applied
- Cases of a sequence of events where a strict interpretation suggests the application of only one deductible, but the working party considers that it would be more reasonable to apply more than one deductible.
A vessel is moored at a port where it is customary to lie safely aground at low tide. Vessel sustains damage due to ranging at each tide During two periods of heavy weather separated by an interval of a number of days of fair weather. A strict interpretation might require that as there were two separate periods of heavy weather, there should be two deductibles. Such an interpretation could lead to anomalies and dispute and it appears reasonable to the working party that in practice in such a case as this the accident or occurrence be regarded as ranging in this particular berth and only one deductible should be applied.
Clause 13
Sue and Labour
Clause 13.4 and Clause 13.5
13.4) When sue and labour expenses are incurred, liability shall not exceed the proportion of such expenses that the amount insured hereunder bears to the value of the Vessel as stated, OR to the sound value of the Vessel at the time of the occurrence giving rise to the expenditure if the sound value exceeds that value.
- Where Underwriters have admitted a claim for total loss and the insured property is saved, the above provisions shall not apply unless the expenses of suing and labouring exceed the value of such property saved, and then shall apply only to the amount of the expenses which is in excess of such value.
13.5) When there is a claim for total loss of the Vessel and expenses have been reasonably incurred in saving or attempting to save the Vessel and there are no proceeds, or the expenses exceed the proceeds
- This insurance shall bear its share of such proportion of the sue and labour expenses (or of the expenses in excess of any proceeds) as may reasonably be regarded as having been incurred in respect of the Vessel
- BUT: if underinsurance - if the Vessel be insured for less than its sound value at the time of the occurrence giving rise to the expenditure, the amount recoverable under this clause shall be reduced in proportion to the under insurance.
Clause 14
Claims payable without deduction new for old
Clause 16
Wages and Maintenance
Clause 17
Agency
Clause 18
Unrepaired damage
Clause 19
CTL
Clause 23
War exclusions
Clause 24
Strikes exclusions
Clause 25
Malicious acts exclusion
Clause 26
Nuclear exclusion
D1
Removal expenses
D1 - 4(a) and 4(b)
4(a) Where the vessel is removed to a port of repair:
* As an immediate consequence of damage, of which Underwriters are liable for the cost of repairs
* OR the vessel is necessarily taken out of service especially to effect repairs arising from that damage
The entire cost of removal shall be treated as part of the cost of repairing that damage, notwithstanding that owners may have taken advantage of the removal to carry out a class survey or to effect other repairs on their own account.
BUT: where the vessel is removed to a port of repair:
* as an immediate consequence of damage of which Underwriters are not liable for the cost of repairs
* or for Owners’ work, other than a routine overhaul as in 4(b) below,
underwriters are not liable for any removal expenses, notwithstanding that repairs for which they are liable may be carried out at the port of repair.
4 (b) Where the vessel is removed to a repair port for routine overhaul at which repairs on both Owners’ and Underwriters’ accounts are effected
* The expenses of removal shall be apportioned pro rata to the cost of all work effected at the port (including drydock dues and general services)
D5
Drydock common expenses
D6
Tankers common expenses
D8
Scraping and painting