Issues in experimental design Flashcards

1
Q

What are experiments so important?

A
  • Correlation does not imply causation

* Researchers can manipulate variables (Experimental manipulation) to examine and determine possible cause and effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are independent and dependent variables?

A
  • Independent variable: The manipulation used by the researcher
  • Dependent variable: The outcome measured by the researcher
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are independent designs?

A

Different independent participants in each group e.g. sex differences (Men vs Women)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are repeated designs?

A

Same participants repeat the experiment in each condition e.g. Time of day (Morning vs Evening)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the advantages and disadvantages of independent participants?

A

Advantages:
• Participation in one condition does not influence another.

Disadvantages:
• Individual differences between groups (random variance)
• Need more participants!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the advantages and disadvantages of repeated participants?

A

Advantages:
• Reduced random variability
• Less participants needed!

Disadvantages:
• Cross condition effects:
- Practice effects
- Fatigue effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is an ABA experimental design and what is it often used in?

A

First there’s a baseline condition measurement, then an experimental condition measurement and a repeat measurement with no condition.

Often used in treatments, the experiment might involve some sort of intervention or treatment to see if it improves or decreases scores. Measurements taken before treatment, during the treatment and after treatment. Then you see if the scores changed during the treatment and whether they stay the same after the treatment or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is longitudinal research and what are it’s advantages and disadvantages?

A

Repeated testing of participants over time.

Advantages: Changes across time more accurately measured with the same participants

Disadvantages: Resources heavy – time, money and participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is cross sectional research and what are it’s advantages and disadvantages?

A

Testing of participants at different “ages”

Advantages: Relatively easy, quick and cheap to run

Disadvantages: Need far larger effects to identify significant results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When is longitudinal and cross sectional research most relevant?

A

Slightly different terminology for independent or repeated. Most relevant in developmental or lifespan studies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What should you consider when thinking of using a control group?

A

• Use control groups where appropriate
E.g. No treatment, low dose, high dose

• Consider if control groups should have “treatment”?

  • No treatment at all
  • Placebo treatment

• In medical research, is it ethical to give a control group a placebo? What is an appropriate control?
E.g. treatments for anxiety – is it ethical to give them no treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can you overcome the ethical problem of whether it’s ethical to give a control group a placebo in medical research?

A

In medical research, it might not be ethical to give a control group a placebo.
To overcome this, the control group tends to be given the standard treatment.
So there would be some kind of standard treatment that everybody gets within NHS guidelines and the research would be looking at whether there is a new treatment that is even better than that.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is an experimental design?

A

Participants can be randomly allocated to the different conditions. E.g. Allocate participants to drug group or placebo control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a quasi experimental design?

A

Participants cannot be randomly allocated; groups are pre-defined. E.g. Sex differences (male vs. female) in verbal fluency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In what designs do practice and fatigue effects occur?

A

In repeated measures designs only.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are practice and fatigue effects and what is the problem here?

A

Practice effects
• Scores increase due to practice

Fatigue effects
• Scores decrease due to fatigue

The big problem here is that we don’t know if the changes in scores are due to our manipulation or due to practice and fatigue effects.

17
Q

How can you tell if changes in scores are due to the manipulation or due to practice and fatigue effects

A

By using counterbalancing

18
Q

What is counterbalancing?

A

Counterbalancing:

Alternate forms of measures
• Multiple versions of the same test, equivalent in measurement, well validated with reliable scores.

E.g. If we had version A and version B of a test, we can give half of the participants version A first and half of the participants version B first and then give them the other test after. Randomly allocate participants to either test A then B or test B then A.

19
Q

What are the possible sources of experimenter bias?

A
  • In design of experiment
  • In selecting participants
  • In treatment of participants during study
20
Q

What are the possible sources of participant bias?

A
  • Attempt to “guess” what the experiment is about

* Attempt to “help” researcher get “right” results

21
Q

What are some ways of reducing or avoiding bias in research?

A
  • Double-blind design: Neither the experimenter nor the participant know which “group” they are in, therefore they can’t adjust behaviour
  • Research protocols and standardisation: Clear and repeatable procedure (might have a script of things to say to the participant to make sure they say everything in the correct order and don’t miss anything out. The script creates a standardisation across participants, furthermore if there are multiple researchers running the study, they’ll all be doing it in the same way.)
  • External review: For example, experts review applications for research funding and all publications are rigorously reviewed before acceptance
22
Q

What are confounding variables?

A
  • Measurable variable that may explain variability in data

* Also sometimes called: covariate, control variable…..

23
Q

What is experimental variability?

A

Experimental variability is the variability between conditions, that we cause, the “good variability”

24
Q

What is random variability?

A

Random variability is within the group, this is where we may have some confounding variables like individual differences.

25
Q

What is a way of dealing with confounds?

A

By matching participants

One way of dealing with confounds through the design of the experiment
• Identify and measure possible variables
• Then ensure they are the same in both conditions

E.g. before you start the study test how many units of alcohol they drink per week and then match similar participants and put them in either condition. This makes sure that the participants are balanced in both conditions.

This means that if there is a difference it’s due to your manipulation rather than individual differences.

26
Q

What is the difference between a one tailed and two tailed hypothesis?

A

In a one tailed hypothesis you specify the direction and in a two tailed hypothesis you do not specify direction.

27
Q

How do you choose to make a one or two tailed hypothesis?

A

Make sure your prediction follows on from the research you do in the introduction.

So, if you have an introduction that is saying for example, that memory is going to be better for early life events than for current events and it’s really consistent in research, then you should have a one tailed hypothesis and specify the direction of your prediction.

If the introduction is inconsistent and you find research that says opposite things to each other, you will then want to come up with a two-tailed hypothesis saying you think there will be a difference but not specify the direction.