Issues in diagnosis; Validity Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Valid diagnosis

A

-A valid diagnosis is one that is accurate and true/ correct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In order for diagnoses to be correct 2 main conditions have to be satisfied;

A
  • The illness has to be reliably defined / classified and diagnosed
  • The illness has to be validly defined or classified
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How reliability relates to validity of diagnosis

A
  • If the reliability of diagnosis is poor then so too is the validity.
  • If there is inconsistency (lack of reliability) in diagnosis across clinicians at least one must be an invalid diagnosis.
  • Reliability is not a guarantee of correctness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rosenhan (1973)

A

Rosenhan’s (1973) study, in which pseudo- patients reported that they were hearing a voice saying ‘thud’ to doctors at psychiatric hospitals. All but one received a diagnosis of schizophrenia. In this case, the doctors were very reliable in their diagnoses, but they were invalid, i.e., wrong; none of the pseudo- patients had schizophrenia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Major problem

A

-In Sz there is no physiological indicator of illness; so all psychiatrists can do is observe behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Truth of diagnosis

A
  • Reduced by low reliability
  • Improved by increased reliability
  • Relies on valid classification system
  • Improvements in validity as a result of improvements in reliability?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Invalid diagnosis =>

A

Wrong treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Diagnosis =>

A

Labelling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Truth of classification

A
  • Is Sz a genuine, distinct disorder?
  • Descriptive: do symptoms cluster?
  • Aetiological: causes/ mechanisms
  • Predictive: prognosis over time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Invalid classification =>

A

Invalid diagnosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Swartz

A

This is shown in Swartz’s case study of an African –American woman who was wrongly prescribed antipsychotics for 10 years to treat hallucinations and agitation. An EEG later revealed evidence of epilepsy, and when the appropriate treatment (anticonvulsants) was given, her symptoms disappeared.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Treatment

A

If psychiatrists are to treat schizophrenia properly they must be diagnosing it properly. If diagnoses are invalid two errors can occur;

  • False positive
  • False negative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

False positive

A
  • If a patient is diagnosed with an illness that they do not have then they may receive treatment with powerful anti- psychotic drugs
  • This may lead to the side effects of anti- psychotics, such as weight gain, sexual dysfunction and tardive dyskinesia
  • Some argue that treating people with anti- psychotics when they don’t have Sz can sensitise dopamine receptors and induce the symptoms of Sz
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

False negative

A
  • If a patient is not diagnosed with an illness that they do have, then they will not receive treatment for an illness that they do have
  • This leaves patients vulnerable and suffering unnecessarily
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Perlman (2000)

A

Perlman (2000) reported on patients (who it turned out had Asperger’s syndrome) diagnosed with undifferentiated schizophrenia, but did not fit the criteria properly: they had negative symptoms only. These patients were given unnecessary antipsychotics despite a lack of positive symptoms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Research

A
  • If psychologists are to explain schizophrenia doctors to be diagnosing it properly, i.e., in a valid way
  • If diagnoses are inconsistent or based on an invalid definition, explanations cannot be properly tested.
17
Q

Descriptive validity- are the symptoms right?

A

In the case of schizophrenia the diversity of symptoms makes it difficult to define precisely; this has been a major argument against the validity of classification of the illness. Individual patients can have little in common with each other yet have the same diagnosis. Kleitman points out that there is no pathognomonic (defining) symptom of schizophrenia.
The boundaries between schizophrenia and depression are often blurred, since they share many symptoms. Negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as anhedonia, ‘the decreased ability to experience pleasure from positive stimuli’, sound very similar to a core symptom of depression, that the patient has ‘markedly diminished interest or pleasure in all, or almost all activities most of the day, nearly every day’. This suggests that the two disorders are not distinguished clearly enough, reducing the validity of classification.

18
Q

Aetiological validity- can we identify causes / mechanisms?

A

It is plausible to use evidence from causes or mechanisms to argue that an illness is well- defined. A problem with schizophrenia is that there is disagreement on its causes and the mechanisms involved.
However, Howes & Kapur (2008) argue that pre- synaptic dysregulation of dopamine is involved in all cases of schizophrenia that involve psychotic symptoms (i.e., hallucinations and delusions). They say that this is the common mechanism in all cases of schizophrenia, even if the initial cause of the dysregulation may be different in different cases. This suggests that if we restrict the term schizophrenia to those with psychotic symptoms, and that such symptoms are caused by dopamine dysregulation, that the disorder can be defined in a clearer way, i.e., such that there is a mechanism that is the same in all cases. If this claim were supported by research this would give the classification of schizophrenia much greater aetiological validity.

19
Q

Predictive validity- what is the prognosis / reaction to treatment?

A

In a well- defined illness we should be able to describe how the illness progresses over time and predict how they will react to treatments.

About 1/3 of patients remain chronically ill, about 1/3 recover from initial bouts of the illness and about 1/3 have periods of illness and periods of being relatively well. This shows that patients have very different histories and that it would be hard to predict who would have better outcomes.

Reaction to treatments for schizophrenia, especially drug treatments, is very mixed. All drugs that have any effectiveness are those that target dopamine receptors, but some are effective for some patients but not others, and prognosis is unpredictable.