issues Flashcards
What is a sneaky Plaintiff for purposes of Supplemental Jurisdiction
A sneaky P is a P who tries to circumvent the limits of diversity jurisdiction. If a piggy back claim is brought in by the P who is trying to sneak in a claim against D under rules 14 (third-party Ps) , 19 (required joinder) , 20 (permissive joinder), or 24 (intervention) , Supplemental Jurisdiction is not available for these claims.
T or F If a federal statute does not provide a federal remedy for a violation, there is no federal jurisdiction (because allowing such jurisdiction would go against Congress’s decision not to create a federal cause of action).
True
Claims that do not provide subject-matter jurisdiction may be combined with appropriate claims through the court’s supplemental jurisdiction provided they arise out of the same case or controversy [28 U.S.C. Sec. 1367]. However, there is an important exception. explain
If the primary claim is in federal court solely based on diversity jurisdiction and the secondary claim is a claim made by the plaintiff against parties other than the diverse defendant (through joinder, impleader, or intervention), if the secondary claim fails to meet complete diversity and amount in controversy requirements, the secondary claim cannot be heard in federal court.
The amount in controversy can be aggregated even if the claims are unrelated, so long as they are:
asserted by the same plaintiff against the same defendant.
For all civil actions brought in federal court, venue is proper where:
1) the district where any defendant resides, provided that all defendants are located in the same state;
2) the district where a substantial portion of events occurred; or
3) the district where any defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction
A defendant who is a citizen of the state where the case is brought originally may not remove a case, even if the case could have been brought originally in federal court, if the case if founded solely on and the defendant
defendant is a citizen of the state where the case is brought.
T or F While it is true that a defense based on a federal statute is insufficient grounds for removal, again a case that should have originally been brought pursuant to a federal statute is removable
True
An attorney violates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 when he signs a pleading without having conducted a reasonable inquiry into whether the pleading is:
What does an attorney’s signature on a pleading certify?
frivolous, legally unreasonable, or without factual foundation.
An attorney’s signature on a pleading certifies that the pleading is supported by such reasonable inquiry.
Under Erie, state law applies if it is a law that deals with the substantive rights of state citizens, and federal courts will use federal, not state, procedural rules. The Erie doctrine applies only where the following are both present:
1) the court has subject-matter jurisdiction over a case, based on diversity or supplemental jurisdiction; and
(2) the state law that would apply conflicts with the federal rule, statute, doctrine, or procedure at issue.
In opposing a motion for summary judgment, a plaintiff is not permitted to rely on evidence that
no rational fact finder would find sufficient to establish the element.
A dismissal for failure to prosecute is a dismissal with/without prejudice, unless the dismissal order states otherwise.
Is failure to prosecute generally a judgment on the merits? if so why?
with prejudice
Yes, it is a judgment on the merits because it is a dismissal with prejudice.
A defendant must assert the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction in a motion to dismiss or an answer, or the defense will be ________.
Waived
T or F A defendant waives an affirmative defense if he does not raise it in his first responsive pleading.
Give an example
True
example: waives contributory negligence if not raised in first responsive pleading.
Generally, an appellate court will not review errors that are alleged to have occurred at the trial court level unless those errors are on the record. What does this mean?
That means that if the appellant did not raise or object to an error at the time the trial court had an opportunity to correct it, the issue is unreviewable.
T or F A pleading may make inconsistent claims or defenses. The court will allow inconsistent pleadings to be determined by the trier of facts.
true