Is there a valid will? Flashcards

1
Q

I there a valid will?

approach

A

In order for there to be a valid will there has to be (1) intent, (2) capacity, and (3) formalities (formal will vs. holographic will).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Testamentary Intent

A

There is testamentary intent if T intended for the instrument (at the moment of execution) to be a revocable disposition of his property upon his death.
(watch for wrong will /s/-Maj. no intent … & conditional wills, OK if not against public policy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Testamentary Capacity

A

T has testamentary capacity if he is (1) 18 years old (chronological age, not mental age), (2) T knew and understood at the time of making the will (a) the nature and extent of his bounty, (b) persons who are the natural objects of his bounty, and (c) the nature of the disposition (i.e., I.S. vs. will provisions)
(watch for insane delusion, fraud, undue influence, mistake, and ambiguity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Insane delusion

A

A T will be found to have suffered from an insane delusion if, at the time of execution of the will, (1) T had a false idea or belief, (2) that had no basis in reason, (3) that was the product of an unsound or sick mind, and (4) it materially affected T’s will (i.e.,”but for” the insane delusion, the disposition would not have been made).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Undue Influence

A

is where T’s free will is destroyed by (1) susceptibility to influence (i.e., age, health, etc.), (2) opportunity for influence to be exercised, (3) a disposition to influence for improper purposes, and (4) the provisions are unnatural (mere larger portion and/or kindness or affection not enough)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mistake

A

If T executes a will but is mistaken as to the contents or it is not T’s will, it will fail due to lack of testamentary intent.
(try to argue ambiguity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ambiguity

A

If T’s words/descriptions are subject to multiple interpretations, extrinsic evidence is admissible to determine the meaning. CA will not allow extrinsic evidence when using fanciful reasoning where the words are not “reasonably susceptible.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Legal Formalities of a Formal Will

A

A formal will (1) must be in writing, (2) signed by T or by some other person in T’s presence and at T’s direction, (3) attested by two competent witnesses (each of who are present at the same time and witness either the /s/ of the will or T’s acknowledgment thereof), and (4) said witnesses understand the instrument they /s/ is T’s will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Legal Formalities of a Holographic Will

A

A holographic will requires (1) that the material provisions, if not then entire instrument, be in T’s handwriting, and (2) that it be signed by T. A date not required unless deemed material.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fraud in the Execution

A

T was deceived as to the nature of the document that T was /s/ (i.e., telling T doc was is not a will)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fraud in the Inducement

A

T was deceived as to the contents of the will or reasons make a will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly