is sociology a science? Flashcards
qualities of science
- objective
- value free - no opinions
- based on research - empirical evidence
- builds on existing knowledge
- hypothesis formation - carry out experiments and test them
- falsification - try to prove theories wrong
- predictions - produce cause and effect relationships
- scrutiny - a theory will be scrutinized by other scientists
positivist view
- sociology should follow the methods and the ideas of the natural sciences
- e.g. sociology should explain educational behaviour in terms of social facts
interpretivist view
- sociology should be to understand how people make sense of their experiences
- people cannot be studied in the same way as rocks and chemicals
early positivist beliefs and founders
- AUGUSTE COMTE (1789-1857) - founding father of sociology
- the enlightenment brought about a huge interest in science which led to secularisation
- early positivists believed sociology would find out how society operated and then be able to create a better society
- only directly observable facts that can be counted and quantified can count as evidence
- it is then possible to identify cause and effect relationships, and discover the laws underlying social evolution
DURKHIEM - comparative approach
- developed the positivist idea of ‘the science of society’ a stage further
- used the comparative approach - thought experiment using secondary sources
- positivists see this as the equivalent to an experiment
DURKHEIM’s study of suicide conclusion
- suicide rates were caused by variations in levels of social integration and moral regulation - event to which individuals are part of the wider group
- DURKHEIM believed that his research on suicide proved that scientific methodology was appropriate for the study of society
interpretivists against sociology as a science
- believe sociology should not model itself on the natural sciences
- the subject matter of sociology is meaningful social action
- humans have a consciousness - make sense of and construct their world by attaching meanings to it
- people have a free will and don’t simply react to external stimuli
DOUGLAS - interactionist criticisms of DURKHEIM’s study of suicide
- DOUGLAS
- rejects positivism and the use of quantitative data
- to understand suicide, we must uncover the meaning
- official statistics are made from the subjective decisions made by coroners and other social actors - not social facts
- friends and relatives give evidence at inquests
POPPER (philosopher) - falsification
- scientific knowledge is superior to other types of knowledge because it can be proved wrong - falsification
- he supported the deductive model for studying sociology as a science
- theories must be constructed in such a way that falsification is possible, or they are not scientific
- he believed much of sociology is not scientific because it consists of theories that cannot be proved wrong
- it could be scientific because it can produce hypothesis that can be falsified
inductive approach to study - what positivists such as DURKHEIM and MARX used
- gathering data
- classifying and analysing
- produce theories
deductive approach - what science follows, POPPER argues in order for sociology to be a science it should adopt this approach
- theory
- use data to test the theory
- the theorists must be open for falsification
what is a paradigm?
- like a set of rules and beliefs that scientists follow when conducting research
- shapes how they understand and investigate the world
- when enough anomalies or inconsistancies, it can lead to a scientific revolution where the old paradigm is replaced by a new one
scientific paradigms - THOMAS KUHN
- scientists have a tendancy to share certain assumptions, and conduct research based on these assumptions
- KUHN refers to these as paradigms
- a paradigm is shaped by the members of the scientific community. shapes the way they see things and carry out research
- scientists are simply problem solving within the existing paradigm
KUHN - sociology can’t be a science
- sociology has a range of perspectives - no shared perspective (no paradigm)
- according to KUHN’s definition, sociology is in a pre-scientific situation
- it can only be a real science when all its differences are resolved
postmodernism view - relativism - LYOTARD
- argues the idea of a scientific sociology is irrelevant
- natural science is a meta narrative (big stories) - LYOTARD
- there isn’t one dominant form of knowledge that society follows
- science is just another view of the world - no more valid than any other such as religion, sociology (relativism)
realist approach to sociology as a science - SAYER
- accepts that there are differences between the natural sciences and social sciences, but sociology can still be categorized as a science
- some sciences operate in closed systems, where variables can be controlled
- also operates in open systems e.g. meteorology where things cant be controlled but you can measure the effects - similar to sociology
- both natural and social world are produced by underlying structures and mechanisms