IS-MP & IS-LM Flashcards
What is the difference in order of causality between Classical and Keynesian analysis?
Classical: FoPs –> Output –> Demand
The economy has a given supply of capital and labour (in real terms), production function determines inelastic AS and AD adjusts to match
Keynesian: Demand –> Output –> FoPs
In the SR, firms sell what is demanded (in nominal terms), production adjusts elastically to absorb demand changes, this determines factor employment
What is the difference between planned and actual expenditure?
Planned expenditure (in closed economy) E = C + I + G = aggregate consumption + aggregate planned investment + government final expenditure = C̄ + c(Y - T) + I(r) + G
Actual expenditure A = Y
The difference is in inventories as unsold products are “bought” by the producer for national accounting
Inventories are accumulated when A > E and depleted when A < E
What is the Keynesian Cross?
The diagram of A, E against Y that plots E (+ve y-intercept and slope 0 < c < 1) and A (slope 1 starting at origin) which shows that there is a single goods market equilibrium where A = E (inventories unchanging)
What happens on either side of the equilibrium in the Keynesian cross?
To the left inventories fall so firms raise production towards the eqm
To the right inventories accumulate so firms cut production towards the eqm
How do you find the Keynesian multiplier algebraically?
Expand and rearrange Y = A = E to get Y on one side which will leave a multiplier of 1/(1 - c) > 1
How do you represent the Keynesian multiplier graphically on the Keynesian cross?
An increase in G shifts the E curve up by ∆G which shifts Y* to the right by ∆Y = 1/(1 - c) ∆G
What causes the multiplier effect?
An increase in government spending raises output which increases disposable income which increases consumption which further increases total planned expenditure which increases income and so on
Y increased by ∆G => C increased by c∆G => Y increased by c∆G + c2∆G and so on => income increased by ∆G(1 + c + c2 + …) = ∆G/(1 - c)
What variations of the multiplier exist in other models?
0 < multiplier < 1: C and/or I falls when G increases
multiplier = 0: Y solely supply-side determined
multiplier < 0: Y falls when G increases
What does empirical evidence say about the multiplier?
IMF 2012: advanced countries had multiplier around 0.5 in three decades before 2009 and 0.9-1.7 after
This aligns with existence of underemployed factors in the Keynesian model
What could decrease the multiplier?
If taxes were proportional to income C = c(1 - t)Y so the multiplier would be 1/(1 - c(1 - t)) < 1/(1 - c)
Leakages from the circular flow decrease the multiplier
How is the IS curve derived?
From the relationship between Y and r in the expenditure (goods market) equilibrium Y = 1/(1-c) (C̄ - cT + I(r) + G)
A fall in r would increase I which shifts E upwards by ∆I which increases eqm income by ∆Y = ∆I/(1 - c) so the graph of r against Y has a similar shape to r against I (downward sloping)
When r falls, planned investment rises which causes SR disequilibrium E > A so firms raise production and output rises
What is the IS curve?
The locus of points in (Y, r) space where a goods market eqm obtains
This is also the set of points where savings equal planned investment which comes from closed-economy GDP accounting assuming E = A => I(r) = (Y - T - C) + (T - G) = priv saving + pub saving = S
What is the difference in approach to saving between the classical and Keynesian model?
In the Keynesian model investment generates its own saving (fall in r increases I which increases Y and some of this is saved, with Y increasing until S = I(r))
In the classical model there is a unique equilibrium between savings and investment determined by the fixed level of output, i.e. a unique real interest rate which equilibrates the loanable funds market (fixed supply)
How would the IS curve be affected by changes to G or C̄?
Increase in G shifts E up by ∆G which increases Y by ∆Y = ∆G/(1-c) for all values of r so the IS curve shifts to the right by ∆Y
Same for C̄ or exogeneous changes to investment
What can change the slope of the IS curve?
The sensitivity of I(r) to r: flatter (more responsive) I(r) schedule implies flatter IS
Size of multiplier (MPC): lower c implies less ∆Y for given ∆I so steeper IS
What is the difference between the views on borrowing for government stimulus between the Keynesian and classical models?
In the Keynesian model this is very effective as the fiscal multiplier is greater than 1
In the Classical model increased government spending crowds out investment so savings becomes S’ = Ȳ - C - (G + ∆G) which corresponds to a lower level of investment
If G increases but T is fixed the effect can be analysed through the derivative of S = Y - C̄ - c(Y - T) - G
dS/dG = dY/dG - cdY/dG - 1, since dY/dG in the Keynesian model is the multiplier we get dS/dG = (1-c)/(1-c) - 1 = 0 so no crowding out but in the classical model dY/dG = 0 so dS/dG = -1
What is the role of the CB in the IS-MP model?
To determine the nominal interest rate in the economy which via Fisher eqn and assumption of exogenous inflation expectations determines the real interest rate (set to a target R) which in turn determines income Y* from the IS curve giving a money market eqm
What is the MP curve?
A plot of R in (Y, r) space usually alongside IS
In the simplest case, R = i - πe = r̄
What is the neutral real interest rate?
The rate r̄ which equates S with I when Y = Ȳ and there are no temporary shocks to planned expenditure (can think of it as coming from the classical model)