Involuntary Manslaughter - Gross Negligence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

All steps?

A

1) Duty of care
2) Breach of duty
3) Gross negligence
4) Risk of death
5) Causation
6) Conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intro is…?

A

Act + defintion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Act for GBH?

A

None

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Definition of + case?

A

None

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Step 1?

A

Duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intro + 2 things for step 1 + cases?

A

Intro - (Adomako) Neighbour principle from (Donoghue v Stevenson) - Duty owed to anyone closely or directly affected by acts or ommisions.
Can be a pre existing duty.
B) Pre existing (Robinson) or obvious duy of care. - Apply the relavant obvious duty.
OR
If new novel situation through (Caparo v Dickman) :
A) Harm/damage is reasonaby forseeable (Kent v Griffiths)
B) Proximity - time, space/relationship
C) Just, fair and reasonable (Mulcahy v MOD)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Step 2?

A

Breach of duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2 things for step 2 + cases?

A

A) Reasonable man test applies - D judged against standard of reasonable man doing same activity.
B) Court considers what D was expected to do and whether they failed to do so/did this to a poor standard.
(Singh) Faulty gas fire caused deaths.
(Wacker) Fails to provide oxygen to immigrants in the back of a lorry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Step 3?

A

Gross Negligence “So bad in all circumstances as to amount, in the jurys judgement, to a criminal act or omission” (Adamako)
(Singh) “judge held that the reasonable prudent person would have forseen a serious and obvious risk not merely of injury but of serious injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Step 4?

A

Risk of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2 things for step 4 + cases?

A

A) Clear and obvious death (Misra + Srivastava)
B) Doctors did not notice clear signs of blood poisoning (M + S)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Step 5?

A

Causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

4 things needed for step 5?

A

A) Factual - “but for” (White)
B) Legal - Ds breach contributedd to death more than minimall and was the operating + substantiating cause of Vs death. (Smith)
C) Chain of causation must not be broken by an intervening act. (Chesire)

If applicable:
D) thin skull rule (Blaue)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Step 5?

A

D is/is not criminanlly liable for Gross Negligence Manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly