Involuntary Manslaughter Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Unlawful act manslaughter

A

Where the defendant does a lesser unlawful act which involves the risk of harm and the act leads to the death of the victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Stage 1 unlawful act

A

Thd defendant must have committed a lesser unlawful act
Battery
Assault

Franklin- the act must be a crime not a civil wrong doing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Khan & khan

A

The unlawful act must be a positive act not an omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Stage 1. Unlawful act side rule

A

The lesser unlawful act can be indirect
MITCHELL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Stage 2 unlawful act

A

Would a reasonable person see a risk of harm
R V CHURCH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Stage 2 unlawful act also asks

A

Would a sober and reasonable person see a risk of harm
DPP V NEWBURY & JONES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stage 3 unlawful act

A

The unlawful act must cause the risk of death

1) factual causation - but for test WHITE

2) Legal causation - significant contribution KIMSEY

3) Intervening acts - are there any causation issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Stage 4. Diminished
The defendant must have mes rea for lesser unlawful act

A

Intention for the lesser unlawful act
GOODFELLOW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gross negligence manslaughter

A

When the defendant did not intend to kill the victim but the defendant beached a duty to the victim and the victim died
R V ADAMAKO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Adamako set a …. Stage test

A

4 . Adamako ~ ordinary principles of negligence apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Stage one gross negligence
Defendant must owe a duty of care to the victim

A

Foreseeable ~ is it foreseeable that the victim will be injured as a result of the defendants actions

Proximity ~ was there a relationship of closeness between defendant and the victim

Reasonable ~ is it fair to give a duty to the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Stage 1 . Gross negligence~ side rule

A

Joint enterprise
If the defendant and victim are jointly engaged in a crime , they owe each other a duty of care
R V WACKER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stage 2. Gross negligence
Was there a breach of duty by the defendant

A

Had the Defendants actions fallen below the standard expected of a reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Stage 2. Gross negligence side rule

A

Is the duty based on an omission
A. Contractual Duty (pitwood)

B. Special relationship (gibbons&proctor)

C. Voluntary assumption of a duty (gibbons&proctor)

D) creating a dangerous situation (Miller)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stage 3. Gross negligence

A

Was the risk of doubt reasonably foreseeable
R V MISRA V STRIVASTAVA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Stage 4. Gross negligence
Was the breach of duty gross

A

Defendants actions must :
•Be so bad they ought to be a crime
•Show a total disregard for life and safety of others
R V ADAMAKO / BATEMAN