Involuntary intoxication Flashcards
1
Q
Do the Majewski rules apply?
A
No
2
Q
Which case held that if D is rendered intoxicated by another persons actions then he cannot be said to be responsible
A
R v person
3
Q
What happened in the case of Kingston
A
D, who had paedophile tendencies that he was normally able to control claimed that he was drugged by P in the hope that he would sexually assault V (also drugged) which D did.
4
Q
What was decided in Kingston
A
A drugged/drunken intent is still an intent even if involuntarily intoxicated. The normal rules of AR and MR will apply.
5
Q
When will involve intoxication provide a defence for SIC
A
Where D has not formed any MR.
