Investors Flashcards

1
Q

Wachenfeld

A

“Just as Nike has long since accepted that it has responsibility to work with its business relationships to address potential human rights harms in factories where its products are stitched, financial institutions are equally directly linked to human rights harms created by clients using the financing they provide. As for investors, there can be no more direct linkage between one organization and another than through ownership, even minority ownership.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Freshfields

A

While conservative interpretations of fiduciary duty prevail, investors are increasingly paying attention to the link between ESG and returns. As explained by Freshfields back in 2005: “…the links between ESG factors and financial performance are increasingly being recognized. On that basis, integrating ESG considerations into an investment analysis so as to more reliably predict financial performance is clearly permissible and is arguably required in all jurisdictions.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

OHCHR clarification about investors

A

Investor is directly linked to the impacts that the company is having.
Not causing, but means that you need to use your influence to mitigate and cease the behavior.
When you don’t have leverage as a minority shareholder you should work to get leverage.
Prioritize to address the most urgent concerns in operations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Enabling legal environment for institutional investors

A

44% of countries have existing or proposed regulations “stipulating that pension funds can and, in some cases must, consider ESG factors as a part of their fiduciary responsibilities.”
New York University Stern Center, March 2017

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Types of SRI
1. Social screening

A

Styles can include:
Exclusion - exclude anything that includes child labor, for example
«best in class» - you are a universal owner and you acknowledge that you will invest in every sector but you only pick those that are best in class; BUT is it possible to say that there is a “best in class” tobacco or mining or weapons company?
thematic funds - if you have a retirement fund through your employer maybe they give you the choice to invest in clean energy funds, funds that advance the interests of women, etc
Indexes - A basket of stocks where the companies are slotted into one index and you invest in that index (difficult to take out or add different companies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of SRI
2. Shareholder engagement (active stewardship)

A

Proxy resolutions (filing, voting)
Blackrock example
Have to be very short - certain words that can’t be used, so have to be written with lawyers
Even if you don’t file a shareholder resolution, you can vote for the shareholder resolutions that are there if you are a shareholder
Direct dialogue with companies
This is more and more popular with institutional investors behind closed doors
Policy advocacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Shareholder support for ESG proposal stats

A

Average support for ESG proposals (USA) more than doubled from 2003 (10%) to 2013 (21%). As of mid-2021, 34 ESG proposals (USA) had received majority support (50% or more). (Proxy Review 2021)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Society for Threatened Peoples vs. UBS

A

The Swiss acceptance of the case is significant because it represents the first time an NCP has recognized the responsibility banks have for their passive investments through index funds.

The complaint concerns the bank’s financial ties with Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co. Ltd. (Hikvision), a provider of modern surveillance technology that has played a key role in the mass surveillance of the Uyghurs and other Turkic minorities in Xinjiang, China.

The OECD NCP determined that UBS does not have a business relationship with Hikvision regarding its role as a custodian for client-held shares, interpreting that UBS’s involvement as a nominee shareholder does not constitute a direct business relationship with Hikvision, a stance criticized as a misinterpretation of the OECD Guidelines, which advocate for a broader definition of business relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Barriers to SRI being impactful (1)

A

Outdated understanding of ‘fiduciary duty’ because of a narrow reading of ‘best interest’ of the shareholder.
Barriers include: “A conservative interpretation of fiduciary duty as solely focusing on the highest financial returns…and trustees are too focused on the short and medium term” (European Commission) Short-termism can deter investors from engaging with companies on human rights issues that require long-term solutions and investments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Barriers to SRI (2)

A

Lack of information & clear performance metrics to manage responsible investing ‘at scale’
We still don’t have meaningful transparency from most companies in the world about how they are effectively managing human rights and environmental risks. Evolving legislation in the EU and other jurisdictions will eventually start to help fill this gap, but not comprehensively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Barriers to SRI (3)

A

Lack of leverage
Large institutional investors often have more influence over corporate behavior than small investors or individual shareholders. The impact of individual or small investor actions can be diluted if not coordinated effectively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Barriers to SRI (4)

A

Compliance risk & legislative/regulatory gaps
Despite growing investor demand for ESG strategies, the Trump administration—acting through the Department of Labor, which oversees employer-sponsored funds—issued a new rule emphasizing that ESG considerations are permissible only when “they present economic risks or opportunities that qualified investment professionals would treat as material economic considerations under generally accepted investment theories.”
Biden said the admin would not enforce the rule, but this shows the back and forth of executive actions that are not solidified in federal laws
Lawmakers in 46 states in the US introduced bills related to ESG investments in 2023.
Casey O’Connor Willis - if we had stronger regulatory moves, we would have a smoother shift to ESG investing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Overcoming barriers (1)
Outdated understanding of ‘fiduciary duty’ because of a narrow reading of ‘best interest’ of the shareholder.

A

Multi-stakeholder initiatives that actively participate in updating what ‘fiduciary duty’ means in theory and in practice. Moving on from Milton.
Education - taking off the blinders:
Investors, MBA students, lawyers and judges: The debate has moved on from artificial bifurcated view of reality that views investment portfolio in isolation from real world. A modern fiduciary must understand how the corporation affects health of systems it depends on for its long term survival. If you use my money to make a weapon that kills my child, don’t tell me that in 20 years I will retire with more money as a result (Kanzer 2013)
Civil society: We need to better understand the financial world in order to have a critical mass of activists to dismantle it.
Law firms (such as Fairfields) and investment consultants need to continue to build arguments (in conjunction with civil society) that outline the moral and financial implications of ignoring human rights.
Example: The DAPL case (Fredericks)
Civil society should continue to push strategic litigation and build up cases involving investor responsibility via NCPs
The NIIB & Posco case - Importance of explaining the application of the OECD Guidelines to different sectors and in different contexts – in this case the financial sector and more particularly, investors. Letter to SOMO/OECD Watch:
In situations where the minority shareholder finds it lacks leverage, it should consider ways in which it may increase its leverage to prevent or mitigate the human rights risk. This could, for example, involve filing shareholder proposals or entering into dialogue with other shareholders to build alliances for voting on the issue at shareholder meetings. Dialogue with authorities and relevant industry associations could also be considered.
Engage relevant expertise
Responsible divestment / exit
The cost for the entire project for ETP and other firms with an ownership stake was not less than $7.5 billion and the banks that financed DAPL incurred an additional $4.4 billion in costs. Further, at least $38 million accrued to taxpayers and other local stakeholders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Kanzer

A

Whether they like it or not, pension funds, are in fact, agents of social change

The debate has moved on from an artificial bifurcated view of reality that views investment portfolio in isolation from the real world. A modern fiduciary must understand how the corporation affects health of systems it depends on for its long term survival. If you use my money to make a weapon that kills my child, don’t tell me that in 20 years I will retire with more money as a result

Divestment can be effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fredericks

A

DAPL case outlining the correlation with failed FPIC and losses in the share price was well as the costs of delays and other material financial implications for disrespecting rights.

The cost for the entire project for ETP and other firms with an ownership stake was not less than $7.5 billion and the banks that financed DAPL incurred an additional $4.4 billion in costs. Further, at least $38 million accrued to taxpayers and other local stakeholders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The Posco case

A

The complaint, filed by Lok Shakti Abhiyan and supporting coalitions in S. Korea, Netherlands, and Norway, concerns POSCOs failure to seek to prevent human rights abuses and carry out comprehensive human rights and environmental studies for its proposed iron mine, steel plant and associated infrastructure in the State of Odisha, India.

The complaint alleges POSCOs efforts to construct a 12 million-ton per annum integrated steel plant, captive power plant, captive port and other related infrastructure in the Jagatsinghpur District will lead to the physical and economic displacement of more than 20,000 people, including individuals who have special legal protections under the Scheduled Tribes or Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act. The complainants maintain POSCO has not engaged in meaningful stakeholder consultation with all affected communities to identify the full scope and severity of human rights, social and environmental impacts. The complainants fear that POSCOs failure to conduct due diligence will mean the company will be incapable of preventing or mitigating significant adverse impacts on thousands of people and the environment.

The complaint also addresses the responsibility of the Dutch pension fund ABP and the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (along with the pension funds asset managers APG and NBIM) for investing in POSCO. The complaint calls on the pension funds to seek to prevent or mitigate adverse impacts directly linked to their operations through their financial relationships with POSCO.

The Dutch NCP, dealing with the case against ABP, accepted the complaint and successfully facilitated several meetings between the parties. In March 2013, a joint final statement was issued in which ABP and APG commit to exercise their leverage bringing POSCOs business practices in line with international standards.

https://www.oecdwatch.org/complaint/lok-shakti-abhiyan-et-al-vs-posco/

17
Q

Pensioenfonds Detailhandel

A

In 2018, Pensioenfonds Detailhandel partnered with academic researchers and asked participants to vote on whether they would like it to expand its engagement with companies on four issues—climate change, job quality, protection of democratic institutions, and responsible production—even when they expect this activity to hurt financial performance.
Roughly 70% of beneficiaries voted “yes,” 20% had no opinion, and only 10% voted “no.”
The experiment showed two things:
Efficient Solicitation of Beneficiaries’ Views: It is possible to efficiently solicit beneficiaries’ views.
Support for Non-financial Objectives: There may be more support for non-financial objectives than many regulators and courts assume.

18
Q

Investor alliance

A

“Our members currently represent a total of over US $14 trillion in assets under management and 21 countries.”

19
Q

Ailman

A

“After the Sandy Hook disaster, our board took a look at particularly firearms, and decided there are certain companies that made firearms that were already illegal in the state of California, and felt that that regulation may expand and hurt those companies.

“We had to write them a letter and tell them we no longer own their stock and
wouldn’t in the future, and I can tell you, they don’t care,” Ailman says. “I just am frustrated that activists are wasting their time focusing in on this as a mechanism when it’s not effective,” he says.

Coalitions working together for divestment will also be much more impactful, given Ailman’s experiences; his case of CALSTERs divesting from gun companies

20
Q

Chandler

A

“The fallacy is the belief that the purpose of a company is simply to provide money to shareholders… Financial failure can destroy companies; moral failure will destroy capitalism.”

21
Q

Abolish dual class share models

A

Both Meta and Amazon are governed via “dual-class” share models. This refers to a share structure in which founders, along with other members of senior management, own a majority of voting shares, making it impossible for shareholder proposals to be approved without the approval of a select few. For example, Mark Zuckerberg owns just 13 percent of Meta’s stock, yet he controls 61.1 percent of the vote due to his Class B stock ownership. Class B stock get 10 votes per share, while Class A stock get one vote per share. If Mark Zuckerberg rejects a shareholder proposal, it is automatically rejected because he owns 99.8 percent of the Class B stock available. Similarly, Alphabet founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin control 51.3 percent of the vote, making it impossible for shareholders to implement change without their buy-in. Modifying this imbalance of power continues to be raised in shareholder meetings, and amendments are continually rejected.

22
Q

O’Connor Willis

A

“if we had stronger regulatory moves, we would have a smoother shift to ESG investing”

“In defining this duty, courts and regulators have tended to assume that investors’ sole objective is achieving the highest risk adjusted return possible. The growing demand for investments that target non-financial objectives related to ESG concerns has presented novel challenges that legislators, regulatory bodies, and courts have yet to resolve.”