Investments Flashcards
Describe the benefits for Dan and Tara of having set up a limited company.
Set up costs allowable against corporation tax
Dan and Tara are most likely employees
If they draw salaries above LEL they’ll accrue a new State pension and be eligible for some State benefits
They could set their salaries between the LEL and the PCT
This would save themselves and their employer (the limited company)
NICs, but they’d still get NI credits and therefore will accrue State pension
Balance of profits can be paid as dividends enabling them to use their dividend allowance
These are not subject to NICs
Ltd company is a separate legal entity
Reducing their personal liability
Company can make pension contributions
These are tax deductible and provide NIC savings
They can make pension contributions themselves
They can provide DIS/income protection / CIC/PMI for themselves through the company
Describe the drawbacks for Dan and Tara of having set up a limited company.
Higher ongoing costs than for self-employment
No privacy – accounts in public domain
Greater administration / reporting requirements
May impact on ability to borrow in the future (a lender may only take into account salary rather than salary plus dividends)
Dividend income does not count towards pension contributions
Explain to Dan and Tara the potential tax implications of working from home.
Without justification to HMRC, the company can pay them £26 a month / £6 a week to cover ‘use of home’ costs
As an expense to the business, this is deductible for corporation tax purposes
£6 a week is not classed as a benefit in kind for the employee so is not liable to income tax
Alternatively, claim for incremental costs of expenses of working from home
Or, draw up a rental licence between the couple and the company where the company pays market rent
However, doing so is likely to mean losing the CGT principle residence exemption on the sale of any part of the property let to the company
The couple are high risk investors with a significant cash holding. Describe the
tax advantages that apply to:
i) An EIS
EIS
Income tax relief at 30% of amount invested to reduce income tax bill
Up to total income tax paid
Clawed back if not held for 3 years
Maximum £1m (£2m for knowledge intensive companies)
Although can carry back to previous tax year
To maximise relief
No CGT on share gains / on death
If held for 3 years
Can defer CGT liability (reinvestment relief)
Reinvest one year before / up to 3 years after disposal
This can lead to an immediate CGT saving
Losses on encashment can be offset against income or CGT
100% IHT relief if shares held for 2 years on date of death
This would save IHT on the estate at 40% on the amount invested
The couple are high risk investors with a significant cash holding. Describe the
tax advantages that apply to:
ii) A SEIS
SEIS
Income tax relief at 50% of amount invested to reduce income tax bill
Up to total income tax paid
Maximum £100,000
Although can carry back to previous tax year
To maximise relief
If held for 3 years
Can defer CGT liability (reinvestment relief)
o 50% reinvested gain is exempt from CGT
o 50% deferred
Reinvest one year before / up to 3 years after disposal
This can be an immediate CGT saving
Losses on encashment can be offset against income or CGT
Otherwise CGT free after held for 3 years
100% IHT relief if shares held for 2 years on date of death
This would save IHT on the estate at 40% on the amount invested
The couple are high risk investors with a significant cash holding. Describe the
tax advantages that apply to:
iii) A VCT
VCT
Income tax relief at 30% of amount invested to reduce income tax bill
Up to total income tax paid
Up to £200,000 per year
But, cannot carry back to previous tax year
Must be held for 5 years of clawed back
No tax on dividends
- No CGT on share gains / on death
No minimum hold period for CGT
But, no CGT deferral/reinvestment relief
But, no IHT relief
The couple are high risk investors with a significant cash holding. Describe the
tax advantages that apply to:
iv) AIM shares
AIM
No income tax relief
No CGT deferral
100% IHT relief if shares held for 2 years on date of death
This would save tax at 40% on amount invested
Explain in detail how either Dan or Tara could use an Enterprise Investment Scheme to potentially mitigate their income tax liability and state the long-term benefits of using such a scheme.
(NB The same question could be asked in relation to an
SEIS – think about how you’d adapt your answer (the information you need is provided in the answer to the previous question))
30% income tax relief on contributions
Limited to total income tax paid in tax year
Can carry back to previous tax year too
Tax bill is £10,000, so invest up to £33,334 to mitigate
Must be held for 3 years
Otherwise tax relief clawed back
Losses on encashment can also be set against income tax
CGT deferral available via reinvestment relief
Reinvest one year before / up to 3 years after disposal
CGT free if held for 3 years
Business relief available if held for 2 years and on death
High risk investment suits ATR and they have sufficient capacity for loss
Diversification / growth potential
Dan and Tara have expressed an interest in commodities. Explain to Dan andTara the benefits and drawbacks of including commodities in their portfolio.
Benefits
Spreads risk by adding diversification
Low correlation with other assets e.g. equity and bonds
Matches their high ATR
Drawbacks
Prices can be volatile
Short-term supply and demand issues
Higher probability of sudden and unfavourable changes in commodity prices when compared to normal shares
Markets are dominated by trading interests
Political risk
With regard to commodities, outline to Dan and Tara the methods they could use to get investment exposure.
Invest in companies that produce commodities
Invest in funds that invest in commodities
Invest in exchange traded commodities
Explain to Dan and Tara how an exchange traded commodity (ETC) works.
It tracks the performance of an underlying commodity or basket of commodities, such as metals or livestock that can otherwise be difficult
to access
It may directly track the performance of a given commodity
Or it may track an index that is designed to measure the value of that commodity
There will be a management fee
Income tax on dividends
CGT on gains
Can be included in an ISA
Usually offshore
Explain to Dan and Tara how a range of exchange traded commodities may be a suitable investment for them. (NB Think about the downsides too prior to your exam – these are listed above)
Offers wide diversification Potential for growth Liquid (especially when compared to direct investment), treated as share Low cost No stamp duty Known price Easy to monitor Different management styles Matches high ATR
Explain briefly to Dan and Tara why having 90% of their investments in cash (or any named cash investment) may be unsuitable for the long-term financial
security.
No potential for capital growth No protection from inflation Shortfall risk Not tax efficient as not in ISA Does not match higher ATR Lacks diversification
Comment on the suitability of direct investment in commercial property for Dan
and Tara.
Single asset – lacks diversification
May move in different direction to main market – adds diversification
Single geographical location – lacks diversification
Potential for growth (property value) / inflation protection (rental
increases) over long term
Rental income tends to be more secure than residential
Growth typically takes place in steps as rent reviews take place after
specified periods
Property cannot usually be split (you have to sell the whole thing)
Market difficult to analyse
In line with high ATR
Cannot be placed in ISA wrapper (no tax benefits)
Will be included in estate on death
Sale and purchase is slow and costly
Outline the alternatives for indirect investment in commercial property for Dan
and Tara.
Shares in listed property companies
Property unit trusts and investment trusts
Property authorised investment funds (PAIFs)
Insurance company property funds
REITS
Explain to Dan and Tara how investing in shares of listed property companies would work and why it might be more suitable than direct investment.
Buy shares in property companies
Share prices affected by quality of management and borrowing as well as property values
Share price rise and fall independently of property values, depending on supply and demand
Affected by both market and specific risks
Company pays corporation tax on capital gains and rental income
May act like professional landlord (secure income)
May be a construction company (more volatile)
Potential to receive dividends and capital growth
But not guaranteed
More liquid way to invest
Diversified over a number of properties spreading risk
Explain to Dan and Tara how investing in shares of property unit trusts and investment trusts would work and why it might be more suitable than direct investment.
UT can invest in shares of property companies or property itself
They cannot borrow money as easily to invest
Price of units linked to value of investments
Fund may be gated in adverse market conditions – up to 6 months
IT must invest primarily in shares and securities of property companies,
only small percentage allowed in property
Can borrow so riskier than UT
Share price moves independently of NAV in line with supply and
demand
No tax on gains in fund
Investor liable to CGT on disposal
Can usually be ISA wrapped
More liquid way to invest
Diversified over a number of properties / property firms spreading risk
Explain to Dan and Tara how investing in shares of property authorised investment funds (PAIFs) would work and why it might be more suitable than direct investment.
As above, for property authorised investment funds (PAIFs).
OEIC that invests mainly in property (UT does not qualify)
Point to taxation moves from fund to investor (as if invested directly in
property)
Ring-fenced rental profits and property related income except from tax
in fund
Other taxable income subject to corporation tax
3 distributions – property income paid net 20% unless held in
ISA/pension, interest income paid gross, dividend income paid gross
Conditions – 60% net income from exempt property investment
business, assets in property investment business must be at least 60%
of total assets, and shares must be widely held
More liquid way to invest
Diversified over a number of properties spreading risk
Explain to Dan and Tara how investing in shares of insurance company property funds would work and why it might be more suitable than direct investment.
Life funds direct holdings of commercial property
Regular and single premium unit-linked contracts
Value of units directly linked to value of property
Fund cannot borrow
Liquidity higher than direct property investment, though fund may be
gated in difficult market conditions
Fund taxed at up to 20% on income and gains
Diversified over a number of properties spreading risk
Explain to Dan and Tara how investing in shares of real estate investment trusts (REITs) would work and why it might be more suitable than direct investment.
A single company or group that owns and manages commercial or
residential property on behalf of shareholders (but not the letting of
owner-occupied buildings)
Company must be UK resident, closed-ended and quoted on a
recognised stock exchange.
If at least 75% of the company’s total gross profits come from property
letting, and interest on borrowing is at least 125% covered by rental
profits, then the company is exempt from corporation tax on property
letting portion of the business.
Gains on sale of properties developed are taxable at 30% unless they
are held for at least three years from completion.
At least 90% of rental profits must be paid out to investors within 12
months of the end of the accounting period. Such distributions consist
of two elements:
o A payment from the (corporation) tax-exempt element – this is
classed as property income and paid net of 20% tax which nontaxpayers
can reclaim (if held in ISA wrapper paid gross).
Higher and additional rate tax payers owe additional 20 and
25% of gross payment respectively.
o A dividend from the non-exempt element – this is classed as investment income, paid gross. Dividend allowance applies.
Thereafter taxed at 7.5, 32.5 or 38.1% depending on investor’s
tax status.
Any capital gains are taxable in the usual way.
More liquid way to invest
Diversified over a number of properties spreading risk
Explain to Dan and Tara how they could buy the commercial property via a Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP) instead and what the pros and cons of doing so would be. (This could also be a R&J question)
Transfer PP funds into a SIPP (workplace pension scheme)
Means they are not using up their cash so can earmark more for school fees if required but still benefit from commercial property
Use funds to purchase property outright
Can borrow up to 50% of net assets if they are insufficient
And/or consider mortgage
Rental income would be paid to the SIPP
Build up in the fund tax-free prior to retirement
Provide an income stream at / during retirement
Any growth in property price would also be free from tax
Creditors cannot claim property couple face bankruptcy
More of wealth outside estate / saves IHT
Property is illiquid
Lacks diversification – depending on cost of property may represent a significant holding in the SIPP
At retirement, property needs to be sold if need a lump sum, e.g. PCLS
Void periods
May not be a good time to encash PP fund to make purchase
Outline to the couple what would happen to their ISAs on death and how this would differ if they were married.
On death, ISA becomes deceased’s ‘continuing ISA’
Cannot add further funds
Tax free until earlier of estate being administered, the ISA is closed or 3 years from death
Because they are not married, they cannot take advantage of the additional permitted subscription
If they were married, the surviving partner could invest the higher of the value of the continuing ISA on death or on the date when the ISA wrapped investments are passed on to them as an ‘additional
permitted subscription’
This protects the ISA wrapper
And is in addition to the surviving partner’s own ISA allowance
The surviving partner must register the APS with a provider
They can transfer the holdings ‘in specie’
Or they can sell the holdings and transfer cash to an ISA up to the value of the APS
APS can be used the later of up to 3 years from date of death
Or up to 180 days after estate is wound up
Outline six benefits to Dan and Tara of using a discretionary fund manager in
relation to the placing and ongoing monitoring of their house sale proceeds.
Professional expertise, bespoke investment and rebalancing Reduced personal involvement Access to larger range of investments Automatic use of tax allowances Potential for improved returns Reporting and tax statements provided
Explain to Dan and Tara, in brief, the features of a platform.
The core purpose of a platform is to offer access to a wide range of investment funds or collective investments
Different platforms offer access to different types of collective investments
Open architecture platforms tend to offer unfettered access to OEICs, investment trusts and ETFs
The wrappers can include ISAs, shares and other investments
The investor’s holdings are all shown in a single account
Which is usually accessed online
Which enables investors to view their total assets and asset allocations
And the up to date value of their investments in one place