Investment & Trade Dispute Settlement (Lecture 2) Flashcards
Principal features of WTO DS system ? (6)
1/ single unified DS system
2/ principle of reverse consensus (=> compulsory jurisdiction of WTO panels)
3/ exclusive jurisdiction (Art 23 DSU)
4/ procedure for appellate review
5/ improved surveillance mechanisms for implementation of rulings + recommendations
6/ strict timeframes for each stage of DS
4 steps of WTO DS process ?
1/ consultation
2/ panel procedures
3/ appellate procedures
4/ implementation + enforcement
Characteristics of WTO DSB ? (3)
1/ political organ composed of all WTO Member gvts
2/ ‘reverse consensus’ for key decisions
3/ authority to :
i) establish panels
ii) adopt panel + AB reports
iii) supervise implementation of rulings + recommendations
iv) authorise suspension of concessions or other obligations under covered agreements (retaliation)
Who has access to WTO DSB ? (2)
1/ only WTO members
2/ amicus curiae briefs are allowed
Causes of action (& types of complaint) setting in motion WTO DS system ?
Types of causes of action :
1/ nullification and impairment of benefits
2/ impedance of attainment of objective of WTO agreement
Types of complaint :
1/ violation complaint
2/ non-violation complaint
3/ situation complaint
Applicable law in WTO DS system ? (3)
1/ no explicit provisions in DSU
2/ thus, generally application of relevant provisions of covered agreements
3/ but, question abt relationship btwn WTO rules/IL rules :
i) VCLT rules often cited as rules of CIL
ii) IL rules as supplementary means of interpretation of WTO agreements ?
iii) panels + AB cannot add or diminish rights & obligations provided in WTO agreements
Characteristics of consultation in WTO DS system ? (4)
1/ first step of DS system
2/ strict timeframe
3/ DSB plays a role
4/ can continue during panel proceedings
Composition WTO panels ? (3)
1/ 3 or 5 panellists
2/ Secretariat proposes nominations
3/ well qualified individuals + independence and impartiality
Scope of jurisdiction WTO panels ?
Only claims under WTO covered agreements
( ! ) but debate about broad interpretation of jurisdiction so as to allow decisions on all issues necessary to settle dispute
3 steps of the WTO panel procedure ?
1/ examination
2/ interim review
3/ issuance of final report
Legal effects of panel and AB reports ? (3)
1/ no provision in DSU
2/ parties must accept + implement rulings/recommendations
3/ no principle of binding effect (but nuance, becomes part of the acquis of WTO DS system and creates legitimate standards of expectation)
3 remedies for breach of WTO law ?
1/ withdrawal or modification of WTO-inconsistent measures
2/ compensation
3/ suspension of concessions/other obligations (i.e. retaliation)
Characteristics of compensation ? (3)
1/ voluntary
2/ offers a benefit
3/ measure extended to all members
Characteristics of retaliation ? (5)
1/ must be authorised by DSB upon request
2/ various requirements
3/ level of suspension must be equivalent to the level of nullification or impairment
4/ applies until removal of inconsistent measures or mutually satisfactory decision
5/ if objection to suspension, arbitration is mandatory
Difficulties with retaliation ? (3)
1/ countermeasures are of a bilateral nature (pertinent for weaker members ?)
2/ raise of trade barriers (threat to progress of trade liberalisation & free trade principles)
3/ determination equivalent level to level of nullification/impairment is difficult
Legal nature WTO panel procedure ?
Sui generis system with mixed character of judicial settlement and conciliation :
1/ ad hoc basis (arbitration)
2/ panel procedures + predetermination of applicable law by DSU + AB’s ultimate role to deal with cases (judicial settlement)
3/ regular consultation with parties + opportunities to dvp mutually satisfactory decisions (conciliation)
3 ways arbitration is integrated in the WTO system ?
1/ notification of agreement to resort to arbitration to all WTO members
2/ notification of arbitral award to DSB
3/ DSB involved in implementation of arbitral award
How does the DSU take the situation of dvping States into consideration ?
1/ particular attention has to be paid to interests of dvping States at the stages of consultation, panel proceedings, implementation
2/ WTO Secretariat is required to provide additional legal advice + assistance in respect to DS
3 general considerations about ICSID ?
1/ created by 1965 ICSID Convention, established in 1966
2/ facilities for conciliation + arbitration of investment disputes btwn contracting States and nationals of other contracting States
3/ Administrative Council + Secretariat
Characteristics of ICSID’s jurisdiction ? (5)
1/ ratione personae : only for disputes btwn contracting State/national other contracting State
2/ ratione materiae : any legal dispute arising directly out of investment (but separate written consent of parties is necessary)
3/ ratione temporis : no time requirement, left to parties’ consent
4/ possibility to decide binding provisional measures (upon request or on its own initiative)
5/ no advisory jurisdiction
Applicable law before ICSID ? (3)
1/ rules of law agreed by parties
2/ if no ^, then law of the contracting State + applicable rules of IL
3/ possible to rule ex aequo et bono if parties so agree
4 characteristics of the ICSID’s awards ?
1/ binding
2/ no appeal/remedies allowed, except for the ones provided for by ICSID Convention
3/ execution of awards has to be accomplished according to domestic law of State party to the dispute (which creates a risk of non-execution in cases of immunity from execution)
4/ parties can request interpretation, revision, or annulment of award (but only under specific conditions)
2 types of mixed arbitration (MA) ?
1/ MA for settlement of investment disputes btwn States/investors
2/ MA as part of peace process btwn hostile States
Characteristics of mixed arbitration ?
1/ combines features of public and private international arbitration
2/ for settlement of disputes btwn States and juridical/natural persons