Investigation of Cardiac Diseases Flashcards

1
Q

Acute Coronary Syndrome

A

Unstable Angina

  • minor plaque rupture/ thrombus that doesn’t completely occlude blood flow
  • chest pain at rest, no ECG or cTn changes

NSTEMI

  • non-full thickness infarction (subendocardial)
  • not typical ECG, have cTn changes

STEMI

  • transmural infarction
  • typical ECG change and cTn change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Classification of MI

A

Type 1: ischaemic myocardial necrosis secondary to plaque rupture (ACS)

Type 2: ischaemia not due to ACS (supply/demand mismatch)

Type 3: sudden cardiac death

Type 4: procedure related e.g. PCI, stent thrombosis

Type 5: CABG related

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Criteria for Type 1 MI

A
  • RISE/FALL of cTn values with at least one value above the 99th percentile URL AND with at least one of the following:
  • symptoms of AMI
  • new ischaemic ECG changes
  • development of pathological Q waves (late event)
  • imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or motion abnormality consistent with ischaemia
  • coronary thrombus seen on angiography
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Criteria for Type 2 MI

A

Same as type 1 except

  • need evidence of oxygen supply and demand imbalance which is unrelated to acute coronary athero-thrombosis
  • no coronary thrombus finding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Pathophysiological mechanisms of Type 2 MI

A

Supply and demand imbalance

Reduced perfusion:

  • fixed CAD lesion
  • coronary spasm
  • embolism
  • coronary artery dissection
  • severe bradyarrhythmia
  • resp failure
  • severe anaemia
  • hypotension/shock/hypoxia

Increased demand:

  • sustained tachyarrhythmia
  • severe hypertension +/- LVH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Myocardial injury vs Myocardial infarction

A

Injury = increased cTn >99th percentile
e.g. heart failure, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, CKD, PE, stroke

Infarction = clinical evidence of ischaemia and rise/fall of cTn >99th percentile

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Approach to elevated cTn values

A

Stable elevation of cTn
–> chronic myocardial injury e.g. structural heart disease e.g. LVH or dilation, CKD, AF, HF

cTn rise and/or fall
–> with acute ischaemia (symptoms, ECG) = AMI either Type 1 or Type 2

–> without acute ischaemia = acute myocardial injury e.g. acute heart failure, myocarditis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cardiac Tn: specificity, cutoff value

A

Sarcomeric protein that regulates muscle contraction
(T-I-C complex bound to myosin)

cTnI and cTnT = cardiac specific isoforms
cTnC non-specific so not used

Cutoff value: 99th percentile used as upper limit of normal (c.f. 97.5 used for most tests e.g. Na, K)
==> high specificity and sensitivity (clear separation of normal and AMI values)
==> exact cutoff is assay specific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Interpretation of cTn, indications for treatment, pitfalls

A

Serial measurements taken (0,3,6 hrs)
–> additional measurements needed even if initial values are normal!! (possible if present early)

–> most important is CHANGE (50% from baseline)
(in patient with no ECG changes/atypical presentation and no change from baseline after 3 hrs – can exclude ischaemia and NSTEMI; but may still have unstable angina)
–> first measurement >5x 99% => TREAT
–> STEMI on ECG => IMMEDIATE REPERFUSION

Use of high sensitivity cTn is preferred

Peaks within 2 days of AMI, returns to baseline over 5-14 days

Avoiding misinterpretation:
- always in context of clinical setting
- remember rising cTn may not always be AMI – can be PE, myocarditis etc; can be non-cardiac causes
- late presentation of MI –> cTn may not appear to be changing (near peak or gradual downslope)
- elevation of cTn can be chronic e.g. CKD
- analytical interference
(cTn will be very high after PCI due to washout effect of reperfusion)

  • cTn is predictor of adverse outcome in chronic HF (higher level = greater risk of MI)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Approach to cardiac marker abnormality

A

Test validity
Test abnormality
Exclude non-AMI causes e.g. PE, CKD, heart failure, myocarditis
Consider AMI (ECG, symptoms, imaging)
Acute and emergency treatment
Chronic and long term treatment (risk factor modification, anti-platelet, antianginal)
Monitoring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ANP and BNP

A

ANP

  • from atria mainly and ventricles
  • response to volume expansion (increase Na and H20 excretion)

BNP (brain/b-type)

  • mainly expressed from heart
  • increases drastically in ventricular disease
  • proBNP cleaved into BNP (active) and NT-proBNP (inactive)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Biological effects of natriuretic peptides and clinical uses

A

Inhibit RAAS: renal excretion of Na and water
– lower BP
Inhibition of endothelin
– vasodilation

Degree of elevation of BNP correlates with cardiac filling pressures, extent of LV dysfunction, severity of symptoms and worse outcomes in patients with HF

Nesitiride (recombinant BNP) has been marketed for treating acute decompensated HF

Clinical use:

  • LV dysfunction
  • distinguish HF from other causes of dyspnea
  • NOT TO BE USED IN ISOLATION to diagnose HF
  • currently not in HA due to cost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Limitations of BNP and NT-proBNP

A
  • more than one cause of dyspnea in a patient – high BNP doesn’t exclude presence of other diseases
  • some patients with severe chronic HF may have persistently elevated BNP regardless of treatment
  • cor pulmonale due to lung disease a/w increased BNP
  • not specific for HF –> LVH, myocarditis, CAD, AF, pul HT, acute or chronic renal failure, ascitic liver cirrhosis, sepsis, endocrine disorders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

C-reactive protein

A

Inflammatory marker – infection or major tissue injury

  • acute phase protein synthesised by liver
  • also produced by unstable atherosclerotic plaques

Activates complement system, enhance macrophage phagocytosis

==> extremely sensitive but non-specific for inflammation

  • up to 10,000 fold increase within 6 hrs and peaks at 48 hrs
  • declines with t1/2 of 18 hrs after resolution
  • have high sensitivity assays
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Clinical use of CRP

A

Concentrations below those seen in infection are a marker of atherosclerotic process

  • a/w risk of CAD, ischaemic stroke, vascular mortality and several other diseases
  • may be part of CV risk stratification in primary prevention (>10 mg/L = very high risk; 3-10 = high risk; <1 = low risk)

Limitations:
- no routinely used in HA for CVS risk

CVS risk
- for intermediate risk patients with 10-20% risk from framingham score –> hsCRP > 2-3 may suggest indication for statins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly