Intuitionist non-naturalism (realist & cognitivist) Flashcards

1
Q

What two arguments did G. E. Moore use to reject Naturalism?

A

The naturalistic fallacy and the open question argument

Moore argued that these concepts illustrate the flaws in defining goodness through natural properties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the naturalistic fallacy?

A

It claims that it is a fallacy to assume that something being natural means that it is good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does the open question argument suggest about the statement ‘goodness = pleasure’?

A

‘Goodness = pleasure’ is uninformative, similar to ‘pleasure = pleasure’, and thus cannot be true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

According to Moore, can goodness be defined?

A

No, goodness cannot be defined without leading to the naturalistic fallacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does Moore differentiate between closed and open questions?

A

A closed question has a clear definition, while an open question does not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What analogy does Moore use to explain the nature of goodness?

A

He compares goodness to the color yellow, which cannot be defined but is recognized intuitively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the role of intuition according to Moore?

A

Intuition is our mental ability to apprehend the non-natural reality and know moral propositions are true or false.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the strength of intuitionism as proposed by Moore?

A

There is cross-cultural moral agreement on core moral codes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Mackie’s critique of intuitionism?

A

Mackie argues that vast cross-cultural disagreements exist and explains moral intuitions through social conditioning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Mackie conclude about right and wrong?

A

Mackie concludes that there is no right or wrong, asserting anti-realism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is error theory according to Mackie?

A

All ethical beliefs are false since there is no right or wrong in reality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Ayer’s theory of emotivism?

A

Emotivism is the view that ethical language expresses emotions rather than beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the verification principle?

A

A statement is only meaningful if it is either analytic or empirically verifiable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why did Ayer conclude that ethical language is not meaningful?

A

Because ethical language is neither analytic nor verifiable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What argument did Hume present that influenced Ayer’s view on ethical language?

A

Hume’s motivation argument, which states that only desires are motivating, not beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fill in the blank: Ayer concluded that ethical language expresses _______.

17
Q

True or False: Ayer’s emotivism is based solely on the verification principle.