Introductory Points Flashcards

1
Q

Intro

A

On the exam, you should look for conflicts issues when the
facts include connections to multiple states. Additionally,
conflicts issues are usually combined with other subjects,
especially family law, federal procedure, or torts.
There are two important but distinct testing areas for
conflicts:
* Recognition of judgments; and
* Choice of law.
Domicile, a legal concept that has applications in conflicts,
also will be covered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

TESTING AREA ONE:
RECOGNITION OF JUDGMENTS

A

A recognition of judgments question may arise when two
conditions are satisfied:
* A judgment has been entered by a court in one jurisdiction;
and
* A party is seeking to have that judgment recognized by a
court in a different jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Terminology Tip

A

The place where the judgment was originally entered is
referred to as the rendering jurisdiction and the place where
recognition is being sought is referred to as the recognizing
jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Core Question

A

The core question then becomes: “Will the recognizing court
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NOTES
2
recognize the judgment issued by the rendering court?” This
will be discussed in the next chapter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reasons for a Party to Seek Recognition

A

Plaintiffs will most often seek recognition in order to access
enforcement mechanisms in the rendering state.
Defendants will most often seek recognition to prevent a
plaintiff from relitigating a claim or an issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ANALYSIS OVERVIEW

A

As noted in I. in the chart below, the first question to ask
is whether the rendering jurisdiction is a sister state or a
foreign country. The answer to that question will lead you to
the correct analysis, as noted in II.A. and II.B. in the chart and
in the forthcoming text.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tip

A

On the exam, you obviously won’t have to do any
analysis to answer the question “is the rendering
jurisdiction a sister state or foreign country.” It
will simply be provided to you in the facts. Most of the time,
the rendering jurisdiction will be a sister state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

SISTER STATE JUDGMENTS

A

If the rendering court is a court in a sister state, then the source of the obligation to recognize the judgment is constitutional (in other words, the Full Faith and Credit Clause applies). By statute, full faith and credit principles also apply to the recognition of judgments between federal courts and state courts. As noted in the chart, there are two steps or questions to ask:
*
Are the requirements for full faith and credit satisfied?; and
TWO-PART ANALYSIS OVERVIEWI. Is the rendering jurisdiction a sister state or a foreign country?II. A. If sister stateII. B. If foreign country1. Are the requirements of full faith and credit satisfied?2. Are there any valid defenses?Recognition is requiredwhen the answer to #1 is yes and the answer to #2 is noIs the foreign judgmententitled to comity?CMR Chart
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NOTES
4
* Are there any valid defenses?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Step #1: Are the Requirements for Full Faith
and Credit Satisfied?

A

There are three requirements that must be satisfied before
the Full Faith and Credit Clause kicks in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Requirement #1: Jurisdiction
Rule:

A

The rendering state must have had jurisdiction over the
parties (that is, personal jurisdiction) and jurisdiction over the
subject matter.
Exception: When the issue of jurisdiction has been fully
and fairly litigated, the jurisdictional determination is itself
entitled to full faith and credit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Requirement #2: On the Merits
Rule:

A

The judgment entered by the rendering state must
have been on the merits.
Other examples of judgments not on the merits include
dismissals based on:
* Lack of jurisdiction (either personal or subject matter);
* Misjoinder;
* Improper venue; and
* Failure to state a claim (sometimes).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Caution: Default and Consent Judgments

A

A default judgment treats all factual contentions as
admitted and is therefore on the merits for full faith and
credit and recognition of judgment purposes. (But since
no actual issues were determined, the judgment could
not be used for issue preclusion.) A consent judgment
entered after settlement also is considered on the
merits for purposes of recognition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Requirement #3: Finality
Rule:

A

The judgment entered by the rendering court must be
a final judgment. The most common application here is a
judgment on appeal in the rendering jurisdiction, which is not
final.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rendering State Law Used to Determine the Three
Requirements

A

These three requirements are evaluated using the law of the
rendering state. (But note that the law of the enforcing state
governs the method of enforcement.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Step #2: Are There Any Defenses to Full Faith
and Credit?

A

The following are valid defenses to full faith and credit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Penal Judgments

A

A penal judgment is not entitled to full faith and credit. A
penal judgment is one that punishes an offense against the
public. In practice, this means that the plaintiff in the suit that
led to the judgment was the state.

17
Q

Extrinsic Fraud

A

A judgment obtained by extrinsic fraud is not entitled to full
faith and credit. Extrinsic fraud is fraud that could not be
corrected during the regular course of proceedings leading
to the judgment

18
Q

Attractive But Invalid Defenses—Public Policy and
Mistake

A

Attractive but invalid defenses also are tested on the exam.
* Attractive but invalid defense #1: public policy.
Attractive but invalid defense #2: mistake

19
Q

FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (COMITY)

A

If the rendering court is a court in a foreign country, then the
source of the obligation to recognize the judgment is comity
or treaty. Rule: Under principles of comity, a recognizing
court will exercise discretion to decide whether the foreign
judgment should be recognized. Many of the same principles
as full faith and credit will be considered to guide the court’s
discretion (for example, is the foreign judgment final? Was the
foreign judgment on the merits?). But there are two additional
questions that a recognizing court may ask follow.

20
Q

Did the Foreign Court Have Jurisdiction?

A

The foreign court must have had jurisdiction. The court has
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NOTES
10
greater leeway to assess jurisdiction than in the full faith and
credit context.

21
Q

Were the Procedures in the Foreign Court
Fair?

A

The American court also will assess whether the procedures
in the foreign court were fair.