Introduction to Teams in Organizations Flashcards

..understand and explain the input-process-output model of group work ..understand and explain the characteristics and functions of groups and teams

1
Q

Groupthink

A

A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when members’ strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. Main aim is to maintain consensus and group harmony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Definitions of groups

A

Lewin: people are a group when they experience similar outcomes
Bales: face-to-face interaction and group means members that meet on a regular basis
Sherif and Sherif: social structure is essential
Tajfel: groups exist when members identify with group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Group entitativity

A

The degree to which a collection of people are perceived as being bonded together in a coherent unit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are important group properties?

A

Interdependence: when a group member’s individual performance or outcomes depend on individual and group actions
Importance: how important the group is due to consequences and tasks
Interaction: form of communication among group members
Permeability: how easy/ difficult it is to enter or leave the group
Similarity: forming a group due to similar interests
Cohesion: force binding members to the group, persuading them to stay which motivates the group
Group size: number of group members
Duration: how long the group stays together as a group
Group structure: developed specific characteristics, norms, roles etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Task interdependence

A

refers to the degree to which group members are mutually dependent on one another to accomplish their tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outcome interdependence

A

refers to the degree to which group members are mutually dependent to receive valued outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Task cohesion

A

Shared commitment to group’s tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Interpersonal cohesion

A

Attraction to the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why is the relationship between cohesion and performance complicated?

A

Relationship between cohesion and performance could depend on goal acceptance, motivating members to work hard towards performance goals. There was no relation between cohesion and performance for groups that did not accept company goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the most important predictor of group entitativity?

A

Interaction was the best predictor, but group size and permeability showed a weak negative relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why are groups important?

A
  • tasks cannot be completed by individuals working alone, or less inefficient or more fun in a group
  • fulfils social need to belong, improving wellbeing
  • strong resistance when there are threats to dissolve the group, people want to be liked and included and being rejected by group members has negative consequences for wellbeing
  • groups help to understand our world through social comparison theory (people want to have accurate views of themselves and of the world by turning to others)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social identity theory

A

This is the part of the self-concept that is derived from group membership. So, group membership contributes to self-identity. Argues that seeing yourself and others as members of groups to reduce uncertainty and make sense of our world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Exchange theory

A

Argues that social relations fulfill individual’s needs through exchange processes like material goods, interpersonal helping, and psychological goods like love, friendship and approval. This theory argues that social relations involves costs, benefits, but benefits need to exceed the costs to yield profit. Satisfaction depends on degree to which other relationships exist to obtain more profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Qualitative research

A

Involves studying groups for extended periods of time like interviews, observations. Offers a rich, detailed picture, resulting in an elaborate description. But only a few participants can be studied extensively-> lacks generalizability. Data can be very rich so drawing conclusions is hard-> subjective interpretation. This method is better for generating theories and finding new areas of research but less useful for testing theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Surveys and correlational designs

A

Giving structured questionnaires with rating scales to a large number of people. This is used to quantify variables, using correlation coefficients. Can also be studied longitudinally. Strengths: quantifying variables and relations, real world relevance. Limitations: rely on subjective data which could be biased, not possible to establish causality and third-variable problem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can different sources be used to collect data?

A
  • using different people to measure different variables
  • combining questionnaires with other data sources
17
Q

Cross-lagged panel correlations

A

This is measuring the same variables at different points in time, measuring auto-correlations which reflect stability over time. Makes it easy to look at causality issues by seeing if one variable preces the other and the other.

18
Q

Experiments

A

A situation is created under the control of the researcher, which allows for manipulations. Participants are assigned to conditions at random. Strengths: testing for causal relations due to manipulation, 3rd variables are evenly distributed (minimizing systematic differences). Limitation: lacks ecological validity

19
Q

Quasi-experiments

A

This is using the existing situation to look for differences between conditions, but results in a lack of control over the situation. Third variables could play a role, and less likely to be able to draw causal conclusions

20
Q

Model of group socialization

A

Distinguishes 5 stages of group membership: investigation, socialization, maintenance, re-socialization, remembrance. Moving from one stage to the next involves role transition. Investigation to socialization is transition of entry, then acceptance (new to full member), divergence (full to marginal member) and exit (marginal to ex-member). The stages differ in commitment: the degree to which a group member identifies with a group and maintains membership

21
Q

What is important for entry?

A

This is marked by a ritual or ceremony, the initiation can sometimes be unpleasant. This can deter prospective members not committed to the new group, can lead to strong relationships. Linked to cognitive dissonance

22
Q

What is important during socialization?

A

New members learn the norms of the group (the rules that prescribe appropriate attitudes and behaviours) and their role in the group (set of behaviours with a certain position). Commitment usually increases. But it depends on the staffing level of the group which is whether the number of group members is similar to the ideal one. It is easier to become a member for an understaffed group than an overstaffed one

23
Q

What is important during the maintenance stage?

A

There are high levels of commitment , members occupy the role in the group that satisfies their needs and achieve the group’s goals. Role of leader, recruiter and trainer (socialization of new members). If role negotiations are successful, the relation between the group and the member will be rewarding

24
Q

Why does divergence occur?

A

Group members lose interest, other groups are more rewarding, commitment declines due to failed expectations of the member. Divergence can follow by re-socialization, persuading members not to leave or accommodate their wishes. After that there is usually an exit and can be social exclusion.

25
Q

What occurs in the remembrance stage?

A

The ex member and the group retrospectively evaluate each other, can maintain commitment to ex-members if positive. Ex-members can try to destroy their former group due to revenge

26
Q

What did research find about pressure on deviants?

A

Group members usually exert pressure on members who deviate from the group norm, but if unsuccessful, the group will exclude them. There was a high number of communications towards the deviate, representing attempts to pressure them to change their position

27
Q

How do groups develop?

A
  1. Forming is when group members can feel insecure due to not knowing each other and the expectations, but they begin to develop a shared identity
  2. Storming involves challenges in developing a group structure, disagreements about roles of the group
  3. Norming is when group members agree on goals, and develop norms for group interaction
  4. Performing is when efforts are directed to achieving the group’s task
  5. Adjourning is when the task has been accomplished or abandoned, the group will end
28
Q

What is the best-known coding system of group interaction?

A

Interaction process analysis which distinguishes between task behaviours and socioemotional behaviours (interpersonal relations in the group which can be positive or negative). Task-related behaviour needed to accomplish goals, but can lead to conflict. So socio-emotional behaviour needed for group harmony. These change depending on group stages (forming -> positive socioemotional behaviours). More time together meant more task-related behaviours, the opposite for less time. Criticism: changes occur gradually rather than abruptly

29
Q

How can IPA be used to look at status and roles inside a group?

A
  • groups develop a speaking hierarchy as some group members talk more than others, and this discrepancy increases with the size of the group. People who talk more are seen as more influential
  • those who engage in task-related behaviours are task specialists but those engaging in socio-emotional behaviours are socio-emotional specialists. these are less influential but were more liked
30
Q

Expectation states theory

A

Discusses how status structures emerge in groups and how they are shaped by the status of group members. Assumes that inequalities in a group are due to performance expectations (members form expectations about the usefulness of each member’s contributions). These are influenced by status characteristics which is distinguished by diffuse status characteristics (race, gender, age) and specific status characteristics. There can be cultural expectations about competencies, which need to be falsified to lose their influence.

31
Q

Why does majority influence occur?

A

This is when a larger subgroup produced conformity in a smaller sub-group, which is due to normative social influence (conforming to expectations of others and having positive evaluations) and informational social influence (to gain evidence about reality). NSI more likely when part of a group for being collectively reward, but weaker when participants were anonymous. When pps had to do the task from memory, they had a stronger ISI effect as they relied on social reality

32
Q

What is NSI and ISI related to?

A

NSI is related to public compliance- a change in behaviour without changing private beliefs. ISI is related to a real change in private opinions known as private acceptance

33
Q

What did Stoner find?

A

He asked groups to respond to a number of scenarios with a degree of risk, had a dilemma between high probability of success and low value or low probability of success and high value. Responded to the dilemmas in private then as a group and made an individual decision. The group judgement was more risky than the average judgements. If answers were cautious, then they became even more cautious. So the choice became even more extreme-> group polarization.

34
Q

Why does group polarization occur?

A

Social comparison: want to be seen as favourable, want to give true opinion without being too extreme or deviate too much from group members. At the start the initial opinion is less extreme, but with similar opinions they express true opinions. Favourable to be slightly different
Persuasive arguments theory: position on an issue is determined by number and persuasiveness of pro and con arguments, but group members provide different and new valid arguments, which supports the opinion even more

35
Q

How does minority influence work?

A

This is when smaller subgroups produce change in larger subgroups. Minorities can be influential as they make other group members less certain about their own opinions by being consistent (confederate changed opinion of other participants Mascovici et al). Conversion theory argues that minority influence will results in private acceptance as they are less threatening and if consistent with good arguments, can convince others. But people will not shown conversion of a focal issue (due to large association with minorities) but change opinion on a related issue (indirect influence)

36
Q

What did research findings suggest?

A

Majorities had a bigger influence on minorities through direct influence and in public and private. But minorities had more influence on indirect influence, and higher consistency resulted in more minority influence-> Mascovici partially right

37
Q

How do minorities and majorities stimulate different thought processes?

A

Having a different opinion to a majority causes stress which narrows attention, so cognitive efforts are limited to verifying the majority position. Most people assume the minority is incorrect, but if maintained will consider the issue more thoroughly. Known as divergent thinking, linked to more open-minded thinking and creativity

38
Q

How was minority vs majority studied?

A

Participants told that either 80% of slides were judged to be blue and 20% green or the other way round. They judged the slides of the colour, with a confederate and had to write associations with the words. When exposed to a minority, the associations were more original.