INTRODUCTION TO SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY Flashcards

1
Q

Defined as the teaching and learning of science
in the context of human experience

A

SCIENCE-TECHNOLOGY-SOCIETY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

SCIENCE-TECHNOLOGY-SOCIETY

Called the ———– in science education’

A

‘megatrend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

‘paradigm shift for the field of science
education’

A

SCIENCE-TECHNOLOGY-SOCIETY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Central goal for Science education

A

SCIENCE-TECHNOLOGY-SOCIETY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

involves a
series of steps that
are used to
investigate a natural
occurrence.

A

Scientific
Method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

6 STEPS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC METHODS OR TO SOLVE A PROBLEM

A

ICFTAR

  1. Identify the Problem
  2. Collect Information/Research
  3. Form a Hypothesis
  4. Test Your Hypothesis – “Experiment”
  5. Accept or Reject Your Hypothesis – “Analysis”
  6. Report Your Results – “Conclusion”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

State the problem to be solved or the question to be answered.

A

Identify the Problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Obtain facts and ideas from books, journals, internet, etc. that provide insight
regarding your problem/question. Cite these resources.

A

Collect Information/Research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Based on the information/research you collect, propose a solution or “best guess”
that will help guide your experimentation and attempt to answer the proposed
problem/question.

A

Form a Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe, design, and conduct an experiment that will give you information or
data that supports (or not) your hypothesis.

A

Test Your Hypothesis – “Experiment”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Determine whether your data/results from the experiment supports (or not) your
hypothesis; if not, it may be necessary to review your information/research and
revise your hypothesis.

A

Accept or Reject Your Hypothesis – “Analysis”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Formulate a conclusion that answers the original question from step one and
share the results with the scientific community (or the community at large).

A

Report Your Results – “Conclusion”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

data that are descriptions of qualities such as shape, color, taste,
feel, etc…

acquired by using your senses

A

Observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2 TYPES OF Observations

A

Objective observation

Subjective observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

an observation based on opinion

A

SUBJECTIVE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

an observation based on fact

A

Objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

a piece of information that can be strictly defined and proved true.

A

fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

a statement that expresses a belief, value, or feeling

A

opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Which type of observations should be used in science?

A

Objective observations should be used in science
because they are based on facts and the basis of
science is to identify the facts!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

an explanation that tries to make sense of your observations

influenced by your experiences/prior knowledge

these explanations may not be true

A

Inference

Example

Observation:

John was breathing heavily as he walked into the classroom.

Possible Inferences:

He ran to class because he was going to be late

He just played basketball in gym

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

a working explanation or trial answer to a problem

an “educated guess”

A

Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

can be written in the form of an “If…, then…, because…” statement

is not necessarily proven correct just because data/results from one
experiment supports it

A

Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

when repeatedly supported by the same results 🡪 theories 🡪 laws

A

Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

factual information

A

data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

types of data

A

Quanti and quali

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

data consisting of numbers

A

quanti

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

data consisting of verbal descriptions or information gathered using
scales without numbers

A

quali

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

experimental tests done more than once

necessary to provide more accurate results; data is averaged together

lessens the impact of a chance error on the experimental results

A

Repeated Trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

things that can be assigned or take on different values
in an experiment

any factor that can change

A

variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

types of variables

A

Independent

  1. Dependent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

variables that may change as a result of the independent variable

the factor you measure to gather results

usually expressed after the word “then” in the hypothesis

could be thought of as the “effect” in a cause and effect relationship

A

Dependent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

variables that are purposely changed or manipulated in an experiment

the factor that you wish to test

usually expressed after the word “if” in the hypothesis

could be thought of as the “cause” in a cause and effect relationship

A

Independent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

a group of subjects in an experiment that are not given any
special treatment

something that is not manipulated

A

Control or Control Group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

same as the experimental group in every possible way,
except for the factor being tested

a neutral point of reference for comparison – it allows you to
see what changing a variable does by comparing it to not
changing anything.

A

Control or Control Group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q
  • An explanation that ties together many hypotheses and observations.
  • Supported by repeated trials.
  • May help with further predictions.
  • Tells why it happens.
A

scientific theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q
  • A summary of many experimental results and observations.
  • Tells how things work
  • Only tells what happens, it does not explain why.
A

scientific law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

are those living entities that have the ability or capacity to reproduce and can give rise to their new generation of offspring through different modes of reproduction (sexual and asexual).**

A

biological species

37
Q

Adapted for walking on two legs, with a pelvis and leg structure similar to modern humans. Small brains averaging 430-480 cc, larger than chimpanzees but significantly smaller than modern humans. Mixed traits, including ape-like jaws and teeth, and human-like limb proportions.

A

early Homins/Australopithecus

38
Q

Characteristics: Known as “handy man,” Homo habilis had a smaller brain (510-600 cc) and larger molars than modern humans, indicating a diet that included tough plant materials. They exhibited some tool-making abilities, using Oldowan tools.

A

Homo Habilis

39
Q

Characteristics: Known as “Upright man,” they had a larger brain (about 900-1,100 cc), modern body proportions, and were the first to use fire and complex tools. They had a flat face and prominent brow ridges.

A

Homo Erectus`

40
Q

Characteristics: They displayed transitional anatomical features, such as a robust skull with prominent brow ridges and a wider nasal aperture. Their tool use included Acheulean bifacial tools and hafted weapons, suggesting complex hunting strategies and social behaviors. Evidence of butchering practices and possible funerary rituals indicates a developing culture.

A

Archaic Human / Homo heidelbergensis

41
Q

Characteristics: They had distinct physical traits, including a long, low skull, prominent brow ridges, and a broad nose, adaptations for cold climates. Neanderthals were skilled hunters and gatherers, often living in caves and showing social behaviors like caring for the sick and burying their dead.

A

Homo Neanderthalensis

42
Q

Characteristics: Modern humans (Homo sapiens) have a high forehead, rounded skull, and smaller teeth compared to earlier species. They possess advanced cognitive abilities and complex language.

A

Homo Sapiens

43
Q

Characteristics: This subspecies of Homo sapiens includes anatomically modern humans with sophisticated cultural practices, art, and technology.

A

Homo Sapiens Sapiens

44
Q

6 Human Capabilities

A

CALMAT

C - Cultural learning
A - Abstract thinking
L - Language
M - Metacognition
A - Advanced problem-solving
T - Tool use

45
Q

An organized group working together or meeting because of common interests, beliefs, or profession.

A

SOCIETY

46
Q

“Web of social relations which is always changing.”

A

R.M. MacIver (1937)

47
Q

“Society—may be regarded as the most general term referring to the whole complex of relations of man to his fellows.”

A

Talcott Parsons (1934)

48
Q

is the meaning, notion, or connotation placed on an object or event by society, adopted by that society with respect to how they view or deal with it.

A

Social Construct

49
Q

3 Components of Social System

A

SIN

Social Roles and Statuses
Institution
Norms and Values

50
Q

Under the social class system of Institution

A

Family
Education
Government
Economy

51
Q

Under the social class system of Social Roles and Statuses

A

Professions and Jobs
Social Classes

52
Q

Under the social class system of Norms and Values

A

Culture
Belief Systems
Practices

53
Q

3 Integrated existence

A

biological
psychological
social

54
Q

usually proceeds by producing false controversies with legitimate science,

A

science denialism

55
Q

Science is defined by its falsifiability, meaning a theory must be testable and refutable. If a theory cannot be proven wrong through evidence, it is not scientific.

A

Karl Popper’s Criterion

56
Q

Science progresses through “normal science,” where scientists solve puzzles within existing theories rather than constantly testing them. Pseudoscience, according to Kuhn, lacks this puzzle-solving nature and often does not conform to scientific norms.

A

Thomas Kuhn’s View

57
Q

Scientific research programs must show progress by making surprising predictions and expanding empirical content. A research program that only adjusts to fit existing facts without new, predictive power is deemed pseudoscientific.

A

Imre Lakatos’s Approach

58
Q

Pseudoscience is identified by a lack of progress and a tendency to ignore conflicting evidence. It also involves selective confirmation and avoids meaningful comparison with other theories.

A

Paul Thagard’s Criteria

59
Q

A scientific theory should be testworthy and encapsulate the explanatory successes of its rivals, with clear, testable implications.

A

Daniel Rothbart’s Criterion

60
Q

A discipline is pseudoscientific if it cannot be integrated into the broader network of established sciences, suggesting a lack of methodological and theoretical coherence.

A

George Reisch’s Perspective

61
Q

Science is guided by principles such as universalism (impartial evaluation of truth claims), communism (shared knowledge), disinterestedness (absence of personal bias), and organized skepticism (critical scrutiny)

A

Robert K. Merton’s Sociology of Science:**

62
Q

Multiple criteria are often used to identify pseudoscience. These include:

A

Here are the main titles only from the text you provided:

  1. Belief in Authority
  2. Unrepeatable Experiments
  3. Handpicked Examples
  4. Unwillingness to Test
  5. Disregard of Refuting Information
  6. Built-in Subterfuge
  7. Explanations Abandoned Without Replacement
63
Q

approach to identify pseudoscience

It is contended that some person or persons have a special ability to determine what is true or false. Others have to accept their judgments.

A

Belief in authority

64
Q

approach to identify pseudoscience

Reliance is put on experiments that cannot be repeated by others with the same outcome.

A

Unrepeatable experiments

65
Q

approach to identify pseudoscience

Handpicked examples are used although they are not representative of the general category that the investigation refers to.

A

Handpicked examples

66
Q

approach to identify pseudoscience

A theory is not tested although it is possible to test it.

A

Unwillingness to test:

67
Q

approach to identify pseudoscience

Observations or experiments that conflict with a theory are neglected.

A

Disregard of refuting information:

68
Q

approach to identify pseudoscience

The testing of a theory is so arranged that the theory can only be confirmed, never disconfirmed, by the outcome.

A

Built-in subterfuge

69
Q

approach to identify pseudoscience

Tenable explanations are given up without being replaced, so that the new theory leaves much more unexplained than the previous one.

A

Explanations are abandoned without replacement.

70
Q

A philosophical method that casts doubt on claims usually considered trivially true, such as the existence of the external world.

A

Scepticism (Skepticism)

71
Q

Often called scepticism; this is the term most commonly used by organisations devoted to the disclosure of pseudoscience.

A

Criticism of pseudoscience

72
Q

Proceeds by casting doubt on claims usually taken to be trivially true, such as the existence of the external world.

A

Philosophical method

73
Q

three distinct usages of skepticism

A

Philosophical method
Criticism of pseudoscience
Opposition to scientific consensus

74
Q

Often called scepticism; this is the term most commonly used by organisations devoted to the disclosure of pseudoscience.

A

Criticism of pseudoscience:

75
Q

Sometimes called scepticism, e.g., climate science deniers often call themselves “climate sceptics”.

A

Opposition to scientific consensus

76
Q

Unwillingness to accept strongly supported factual statements is a traditional criterion of pseudoscience.

A

Resistance to facts

77
Q

Can refer to unwillingness to accept well-supported factual claims whether or not that support originates in science.

A

Fact resistance

78
Q

these are theories according to which there exists some type of secret collusion for any type of purpose.

A

Conspiracy theories

79
Q

the term mostly refers to implausible such theories, used to explain social facts that have other, considerably more plausible explanations.

A

Conspiracy theories

80
Q

they are often associated with a type of circular reasoning that allows evidence against the conspiracy to be interpreted as evidence for it.

A

Conspiracy theories

81
Q

term to describe a type of falsehood that does not amount to lying

A

bullshit

82
Q

is denial of the common assumption that there is intersubjective truth in scientific matters, which scientists can and should try to approach.

A

Epistemic relativism

83
Q

According to Merton, science is characterized by an ——, i.e., spirit, that can be summarized as four sets of institutional imperatives.

A

“ethos”

84
Q

four sets of institutional imperatives.

A

universalism
communism
disinterestedness
organized scepticism

85
Q

The first imperative asserts that whatever their origins, truth claims should be subjected to preestablished, impersonal criteria.

A

Universalism

86
Q

acceptance or rejection of claims should not depend on the personal or social qualities of their protagonists.

A

Universalism

87
Q

states that the substantive findings of science are the products of social collaboration and therefore belong to the community, rather than being owned by individuals or groups.

A

Communism

88
Q

imposes a pattern of institutional control that is intended to curb the effects of personal or ideological motives that individual scientists may have.

A

disinterestedness

89
Q

implies that science allows detached scrutiny of beliefs that are dearly held by other institutions. This is what sometimes brings science into conflicts with religions and ideologies.

A

Organized scepticism

90
Q

is a much weaker criterion than practical falsifiability

A

Logical falsifiability