Introduction to Public Law Flashcards
Why do we obey the state?
Social Contract
- Natural rights suggest all people are free and equal by nature
- Thus, authority, legitimacy and obligation must rest on ‘consent’ to those subject to it
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan [1651]
Explained that we need to bind ourselves to a sovereign state
Hobbes on the State of Nature
‘Of the natural condition of mankind’
- By nature, we are equal and free
- As a consequence of our equality and liberty, we Weill end up in a perpetual world of quarrel and struggles
- Caused by competition, diffidence and glory
- Leads to a ‘war of every man against every man’
A world without government…
‘the life of man [is] solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short’
Social Contract Theory
- We give up our natural rights in exchange for protection of life and property
- Law is integral and central to society = every rational individual would enter into the social contract
Hobbes on Arbitrary Power
- If the sovereign acts in an arbitrary manner then it has violated the social contract.
- Through social contract we have created an authority, but it is never arbitrary
Hobbes on Government
- We create a hierarchical structure through social contract
- Sovereign is the source of law = creates an authoritative regime but not an absolute
- Law is the command of the sovereign, sovereign cannot be bound by law
- Where law ends, civil liberty begins
Locke on Rights
- Natural rights = life, liberty and property (absolute and inalienable)
Locke: Life in the state of nature
- Individuals are free, equal and rational
- Natural right to acquire property through fruits of labour
- Natural law operates in a state of nature
Locke: why leave the natural state?
An authoritative system is needed to formalise and enforce the rules
Locke on Constitutional Government
- Government established by social contract of delegation - not alienation of natural rights
- Does not extinguish all natural rights, retain those that do not concern sovereign and collect e.g. right to religion
- Contract respects basic rights of individual untouchable by collective (modern frame of constitution)
Locke on Revolution
If government breaches trust:
- Power is devolved back to the people
- i.e. return to the state of nature
- gives people the ‘right of rebellion’
- Threat of legitimate rebellion ensures that those in government will not be tempted to abuse their authority
Paine on UK constitution
- rejection of God-given, Lockean language in exchange for reason
- asserted that UK constitution is a result of monarchy, clergy etc. [‘fraudulent rule of kingcraft and priestcraft’]
- “US constitution is to liberty, what grammar is to language”
Paine on the Constitution
- ‘A constitution is a thing antecedent to government, and a government is only the creature of a constitution’
- ‘a thing’ - a document, a piece of paper = “Wherever it cannot be produced in a visible form, there is none”
- If a Parliament can empower itself, it is not bound by a constitution
Loughlin, Sword and Scales: The Hobbesean covenant
- uses the idea of covenant in which individuals cede their natural rights to explain the validity of political order
- legitimise coercive political order through the principles of mutual consent
- Is an act of alienation in which natural rights are relinquishes
- Not done through a contract, but a covenant which establishes the authority of rulership