Introduction to evidence based medicine Flashcards

1
Q

What is evidence based medicine?

A

Evidence-based medicine is a systematic process primarily aimed at improving the care of patients.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the evidence-based medicine triad made of?

A
  1. Clinical judgment
  2. Relevant scientific evidence
  3. Patients’ values and preferences
    These all come together to form the components of evidence-based medicine.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

From video 1: What is evidence-based medicine based on what?

A
  1. Research evidence
  2. Experience and wisdom
  3. Patients need and preferences
  4. Toolbox of approaches. Which to choose in a situation. Services are built on a foundation of evidence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Five steps of evidence-based medicine

A
Ask - structure the clinical question
Acquire - acquire the evidence
Appraise - appraise the evidence
Apply - apply the evidence
Assess - analyze and adjust outcomes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Discuss the advantages and limitations of evidence-based medicine.

A

Advantages:

  • EBM attempts to find and incorporate interventions that work, not those that should or seem to work.
  • Allows practitioners to use critical thinking skills
  • Helps improve the ability to keep up with new information and developments

Limitations:

  • EBM requires specialized knowledge, skills, and support mechanisms.
  • The EBM process can be labor-intensive and time-consuming
  • Requires access to medical literature
  • Publication bias and conflict of interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the hierarchy of evidence?

A

Higher to lower [quality of evidence]

  1. RCT - randomized controlled trials. no bias
  2. Cohort
  3. Case-control
  4. Cross-sectional
  5. Case reports/Series
  6. Ideas, opinions, and reviews

Lower to higher - Risk of bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the evidence we speak of here?

A
  • Findings from patient-centered clinical research that are relevant to patient care.
  • Applied research from the laboratory.
  • Clinical research.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Importance of learning Evidence-based medicine.

A

Helps to make health professionals make more valid and reliable recommendations. It will be easier to convince the health care team when recommendations are based on principles of Evidence-based medicine.

Keep up with a large pool of information

Ensure research findings incorporation into clinical practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case example

A

> The patient is a 65 year old male with a long history of type 2 diabetes and obesity.
Otherwise, his medical history is unremarkable. He does not smoke. He had knee surgery 10 years ago but otherwise has had no other major medical problems.

> Over the years he has tried numerous diets and exercise programs to reduce his weight but has not been very successful.

> His granddaughter just started high school and he wants to see her graduate and go on to college. He understands that his diabetes puts him at a high risk for heart disease and is frustrated that he cannot lose the necessary weight.

> His neighbour told him about a colleague at work who had his stomach stapled and as a result not only lost over 100 lbs. but also “cured” his diabetes.
He wants to know if this procedure really works.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How do you formulate clinical questions?

A

To practice evidence-based medicine the initial step is to convert a clinical encounter into a clinical question.

A useful approach to doing this is PICO:-

Patient
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome framework

A
  1. Patient/ Population: Which patients or population group of patients are you interested in? Is it necessary to consider any subgroups?
  2. Intervention: Which intervention/treatment is being evaluated?
  3. Comparison/ Control: What is the main alternative compared to intervention?
  4. Outcome: What is the most important outcome for the patient?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Asking based on PICO

A

PICO is a mnemonic that helps one remember the key components of a well-focused question.

The question needs to
Identify the key problem of the patient,
What treatment or tests you are considering for the patient,
what alternative treatment or tests are being considered (if any)
and what is the desired outcome to promote or avoid?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Patient problem

A

How would you describe a group of patients similar to yours?
What are the most important characteristics of the patient?
This may include the primary problem, disease, or co-existing conditions.
Sometimes the gender, age, or race of a patient might be relevant to the diagnosis or treatment of a disease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Intervention, prognostic factor, or exposure.

A

Which main intervention, prognostic factor, or exposure are you considering?
What do you want to do for the patient? Prescribe a drug? Order a test? Order surgery?
Or what factor may influence the prognosis of the patient - age, co-existing problems, or previous exposure?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Comparison

A

What is the main alternative to compare with the intervention?
Are you trying to decide between two drugs, a drug, and no medication or placebo, or two diagnostic tests?
Your clinical question may not always have a specific comparison.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outcome

A

What can you hope to accomplish, measure, improve or affect?
What are you trying to do for the patient?
Relieve or eliminate the symptoms?
Reduce the number of adverse events?
Improve function or test scores?

17
Q

Types of study

A
  1. Meta-analysis
  2. Systematic review
  3. Randomized controlled trial
  4. Cohort studies
  5. Case-control studies
  6. Case Series/Case Reports
  7. Animal research
18
Q

For our patient in our case study, the clinical question is:

A

> In patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity, is bariatric surgery more effective than standard medical therapy at increasing the probability of remission of diabetes?

> It is atherapy questionand the best evidence would be arandomized controlled trial (RCT). If we found numerous RCTs, then we might want to look for asystematic review.

19
Q

Acquiring the evidence

A

> Constructing a well-built clinical question can lead directly to a well-built search strategy.

> Note that you may not use all the information in PICO or well-built clinical question in your MEDLINE strategy.

> In the following example we did not use the term “male.”

> We also did not include the wordtherapy.
Instead we used the Clinical Query for Therapy or the publication type,randomized controlled trial, to get at the concept of treatment.

> However, you may consider the issue of gender later when you review the articles for applicability to your patient

20
Q

When Selecting the resources Evidence-based practice requires to do what?

A

Evidence-Based Practice requires that clinicians search the literature to find answers to their clinical questions.
There are literally millions of published reports, journal articles, correspondence, and studies available to clinicians.
Choosing the best resource to search for is an important decision.

21
Q

What are the large databases for medical research and what do they do?

A

Large databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE will give you access to the primary literature.

The Cochrane Library provides access to systematic reviews which help summarize the results from a number of studies. These are often called “pre-appraised” or EBP resources.

22
Q

Appraise: What is involved in appraisal?

A

There are three basic questions that need to be answered for every type of study:
Are the results of the study valid?
What are the results?
Will the results help in caring for my patient?

The issue of validity speaks to the “truthfulness” of the information.
The validity criteria should be applied before an extensive analysis of the study data.
If the study is not valid, the data may not be useful.
How large was the treatment effect? What was the absolute risk reduction?

23
Q

Discuss Clinical significance versus Statistical significance

A

To be clinically important requires a substantial change in an outcome that matters.
Statistically significant changes, however, can be observed with trivial outcomes.
And because statistical significance is powerfully influenced by the number of observations, statistically significant changes can be observed with trivial (small) changes in important outcomes.
Large studies can be significant without being clinically important and small studies may be important without being significant.”

24
Q

Clinical significance has little to do with what? what does it depend on?

A

Clinical significance has little to do with statistics and is a matter of judgment.
Clinical significance often depends on the magnitude of the effect being studied.

25
Q

What question does clinical significance answer?

A

It answers the question “Is the difference between groups large enough to be worth achieving?“

26
Q

Studies can be statistically significant yet

A

clinically insignificant.

27
Q

Apply the results to your patient. Questions to ask (yourself)

A

> Were the study patients similar to my population of interest?
Does your population match the study inclusion criteria?
If not, are there compelling reasons why the results should not apply to your population?

> Were all clinically important outcomes considered?
What were the primary and secondary endpoints studied?
Were surrogate endpoints used?

> Are the likely treatment benefits worth the potential harm and costs?

> What is the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one adverse outcome or produce one positive outcome?

> Is the reduction of clinical endpoints worth the potential harms of the surgery or the cost of surgery?

28
Q

Stages of evaluating the process

A

Stage 1: Asking the question
Stage 2: Finding the evidence
Stage 3: Appraising and interpreting the evidence
Stage 4: Acting on the evidence

29
Q

Evaluating the process

Stage 1 Asking the question

A

Was my question answerable?

Was my question stated explicitly enough to help me in my search for the evidence?

30
Q

Evaluating the process

Stage 2 Finding the evidence

A

Did I search the right sources for the evidence or was there somewhere else I should have looked?
Did I manage to find sound evidence quickly and efficiently?

31
Q

Stage 3: Appraising and interpreting the evidence

A

Did I appraise the evidence effectively?

Do I need to improve my critical appraisal skills?

32
Q

Stage 4: Acting on the evidence

A

Did I involve the patient (and appropriate others) in the decision to act on the evidence?
Should I have attempted to answer my initial query a different way (eg. considered an alternative treatment to the one evidence was sought for)?

33
Q

What are Pre-appraised resources?

A

Filtered resources that have been reviewed for quality and relevance to clinical care.

34
Q

What is in the database?

A

Databases:

> Electronic textbooks and libraries

> Meta-Search Engines- TRIP Database searches across multiple internet sites for evidence-based content.

> It covers key medical journals, Cochrane Systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, and other highly relevant websites to help health professionals find high-quality clinical evidence for clinical practice.