Introduction to biomaterials and surgery in dental implantology Flashcards
What is unusual about the dental implant compared with other biomaterials used in skeletal tissue repair? (2)
Penetrates the mucosa, interfacing with both soft and mineralised tissues
What is a dental implant? (2)
A metal device that is surgically placed in the jawbone. It acts as an anchor for an artificial tooth or teeth.
How is implantology growing and evolving? (4)
Pre-1990, majority of implants were placed in a hospital or specialist centre - now in dental practices
Full clinical competency provided by postgrad training, but dental schools are increasing teaching on clinical dental implantology
Not part of GDC’s specialist lists
Over 200 companies manufacture dental implants worldwide
How many implants placed in USA per annum? (1)
5 million
European figures similar
Types of early implants (3)
Sub-periosteal implants
Bade implants
Trans-osteal implants
“Brånemark” osseointegrating implant (3)
Orthopaedic surgeon, 1950s research in bone metabolism
Used viewing chamber made from titanium
Placed 1st set of titanium 2-stage dental implants in pt 1965
Commercial launch 1985
Careful surgery & pt selection
Titanium biocompatibility (7)
Tough, light, and durable TiO2 surface Low corrosion (due to TiO2) -TiO2 more like a ceramic surface than a metal Biocompatible Bioinert or bioactive? Osseointegrating Biointeraction?: -protein adsorption -calcium phosphate deposition
Options in managing a missing tooth (4)
Accept gap
Denture
Bridge
Implant
Key components of an implant (3)
Crown
Abutment and component screw with cotton??? on top
Implant (or fixture)
Engagement of prosthesis into implant (2)
Tri-channel system with anti-rotation device Conical connection (with anti-rotation hexagonal connection at base of crown) -more even distribution of stress, better for thin implants
Biological events at the bone/ implant interface associated with osseointegration (8)
Be aware that a lot of these studies have been done in vitra (biology) so be cautious about believing everything
(a) Protein adsorption
(b) Protein desorption
(c) Surface changes
(d) Inflammatory/connective tissue cells approach implant
(e) Possible release of matrix proteins and selected adsorption of proteins (e.g. BSP and OPN)
(f) Formation of a lamina limitans/adhesion of osteogenic cells
(g) Bone deposition on bone and implant surfaces
(h) Remodeling of newly formed bone
* *Despite extensive research, it is still not certain which of these is most important with respect to clinical success, and the specific biological events that are most important remain subject to ongoing debate.
Terminology: “bioinert” vs “bioactive” (4)
Two terms coined originally to describe bone-biomaterial interaction
They may be applied conceptually to many biomaterials including dental materials (e.g. dental amalgam v. glass-ionomer cement)
They remain slightly misleading terms, with no material being totally inert following placement into the biological environment
Titanium (and TiO2 surface) not usually considered “bioactive”, but this has been claimed by some authors
Bone tissue response to “bioactive” HA ceramic vs “bioinert” ceramic (canasite glass ceramic)
The classical response of bone tissue to so-called “bioactive” materials has been well-known for a long time, albeit most data is from animal studies with relatively little histological data from human studies.
HA and bone - bioactive
Bone and canasite - bioinert
Hydoxyapatite: A “bioactive” or osteoconductive bioceramic used in bone augmentation (4)
Hydroxyapatite is a calcium phosphate ceramic that encourages new bone tissue formation/healing following implantation into established bone tissue.
The bone-hydroxyapatite interface is direct, forms relatively quickly, and is capable of fixing a medical device in bone tissue (“osseointegrating”).
Calcium phosphates are widely used synthetic bone graft substitutes, but not as effective as a bone grafts (clinical material of choice in implant therapy).
Calcium phosphates are too brittle to use alone as load-bearing implants, so they are used as particulates or coatings on metallic devices
Osseointegration: a clinical perspective - healing period (5)
3 months
- avoid micro-movement (could lead to fibrosis –> failure)
- can wear prosthesis over top, but need to relieve to avoid pressure on implant
- due to dense bone in mandible, some clinicians have shorter healing protocols
- can check stability with radiofrequency analysis (RFA)
Different designs on crowns
Cement retained
Screw retained