Caregiver-infant interactions & Role of the Father Flashcards
What is attachment?
A strong, emotional & reciprocal bond between 2 people, especially and infant & caregiver.
What are caregiver-infant interactions?
meaningful interactions that are thought to have important functions for the child’s development
What are 2 features of caregiver-infant interactions?
- reciprocity
- interactional synchrony
What is reciprocity?
- a 2 way mutual process where each party responds to the other’s signals to sustain interaction
- the behaviour elicits a response from the other
What is interactional synchrony?
- takes place when the mother & infants emotions and actions mirror each other
- its believed that interactional synchrony is important for mother-infant attachment as high levels of interactional synchrony are associated with better quality of mother-infant attachment concluded by Isabella et al.
What was Meltzoff & Moore’s study involving interactional synchrony?
- they observed the beginnings of interactional synchrony in babies as young as 2 weeks
- a male model displayed one of 3 facial expressions or hand gestures while the infant had a dummy in their mouth
- the dummy was then removed and the infant’s response was filmed
- an association was found between the model’s expressions or gestures and the baby’s actions
What did Schaffer & Emerson find about parent-infant interactions?
- majority of babies become attached to their mothers first
- within a few weeks or months they form secondary attachments
- in 75% of infants studied they formed an attachment with their fathers by 18 months - this was determined since infants protested when their fathers walked away
What did Grossman find about the role of the father in his longitudinal study (2002)?
- his study involved looking at both parent’s behaviour and its relationship to the quality of their child’s attachment in their teens
- quality of infant attachment to their mothers was related to the children’s attachment in adolescence which suggests that father’s attachment is less important
- the quality of the father’s play with infants was related to the quality of adolescent attachments which suggests that fathers have a different role in attachment which is more to do with play & stimulation
What was Tiffany Field’s (1978) study?
- evidence shows that father take on role of primary caregiver & adopt behaviour usually associated with mothers
- 4 month old babies were filmed during face-to-face interactions with primary caregiver mothers & fathers and secondary caregiver fathers
- primary caregiver fathers spent more time smiling & imitating their infant (like mothers) than secondary caregiver fathers
- this shows that fathers can be the more nurturing figure
- attachment relationships depend more on level of responsiveness rather than gender of parent
Evaluation: It’s hard to know what’s happening when observing infants
- studies involving observing mothers & infants show same pattern of interaction
- only hand gestures & change in expressions are observed
- it is difficult to determine what is taking place in the infant’s perspective with these observations
- e.g. the infant’s imitation of an adult’s signals may not be conscious or deliberate
- this means we can’t fully know if observations from mother-infant interactions have an important meaning
Evaluation: Controlled observations capture fine detail
- observations from mother-infant interactions are usually highly controlled procedures
- involves filming of interaction from several angles
- this ensures that fine details of behaviour are recorded and can be analysed in depth later
- this is a strength since babies don’t care that they’re being observed so behaviour doesn’t change due to controlled observation
- this means research has good validity
Evaluation: Inconsistent findings on fathers
- research into the role of fathers in attachment is confusing since different researchers focus on different research questions
- e.g. some psychologists are interested in understanding the role of fathers as secondary attachments whilst others focus on them as the primary attachment figure
- the 1st see fathers having their own distinct role and behaving differently from mothers
- the 2nd find that fathers can take on a ‘maternal’ role
- this is a limitation since psychologists can’t easily answer a simple question about the role of the father
Evaluation: Why don’t fathers generally become primary attachments?
- fathers not becoming the primary attachment figures could simply be due to traditional roles where women are expected to be the caring & nurturing ones
- however it could be that female hormones (oestrogen) create high levels of nurturing so women are biologically made to be the primary attachment figure according to Taylor et al. (2000)