Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Auditing Theory > introduction to assurance, auditing and related services > Flashcards

introduction to assurance, auditing and related services Flashcards

1
Q

refers to the practitioner’s satisfaction as to reliability of an assertion being made by one party for user by another party.

A

assertion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

an engagement in which a practitioner expresses a conclusion designed to enhance the degree of confidence of the intended users other than the responsible party about the outcome of the evaluation or measurement of a subject matter against criteria.

A

assurance engagement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

assurance services are performed by _____________ designed to improve the quality ore enhance the credibility of the subject matter of the engagement.

A

independent professional/ external auditor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

objective of assurance engagement

A

a practitioner to evaluate or measure a subject matter that is the responsible of another party against identified suitable criteria and express a conclusion that provides the intended user w/ a level of assurance about the subject matter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

elements of assurance engagement

A

3SECC
1. 3 party relationship
2. appropriate subject matter
3. suitable criteria
4. a written assurance report (conclusion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3 party relationship consists of:

A

a. practitioner
b. responsible party (management)
c. intended users (stakeholders)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

difference between professional accountant, practitioner, and auditor.

A

professional accountant - CPA engaged in any area of accountancy

practitioner - CPA rendering professional services (assurance or non-assurance)

auditor - practitioner rendering audit and review services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

nature of an assertion the practitioner gathers sufficient evidence.

A

subject matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

an outcome of the evaluation or measurement of the subject matter.

A

subject matter information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

it is for w/c the practitioner gathers sufficient appropriate evidence to provide reasonable basis for expressing a conclusion in an assurance report.

A

subject matter information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

characteristics of subject matter to be considered appropriate:

A
  1. identifiable, and capable of consistent evaluation or measurement against the identified criteria.
  2. can be subjected to procedures for gathering sufficient appropriate evidence to support a reasonable or limited assurance.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

benchmarks used to evaluate or measure the subject matter.

A

criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

criteria may be:

A
  1. formal - PFRS, COSO, applicable laws, regulation or contracts.
  2. less formal - internally developed code of conduct
  3. established - issued by law/ government
  4. specially developed - designed for the purpose of the engagement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

characteristics of suitable criteria

A

RUN CR
a. Reliability
b. understandability
c. neutrality
d. completeness
e. relevance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Communication of criteria to intended users

A
  1. publicly
  2. through inclusion in the presentation of the subject matter information.
  3. through inclusion in the assurance report
  4. by general understanding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

consideration when planning and performing the engagement

A

a. quantity of evidence
b. quality of evidence
c. materiality
d. assurance engagement risk
e. cost-benefit consideration
f. professional skepticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

measure of the quantity of evidence.

A

sufficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

the measure of the quality of evidence that is relevance and reliability

A

appropriateness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

the risk that the practitioner expresses an inappropriate to conclusion when the subject matter information is materially misstated.

A

assurance engagement risk

20
Q

the susceptibility of the subject matter information to a material misstatement, assuming that there are no related controls

A

inherent risk

21
Q

the risk that a material misstatement that could occur will not be prevented or detected and corrected, on a timely basis by related internal control

A

control risk

22
Q

the risk that the practitioner will not detect a material misstatement that exists.

A

detection risk

23
Q

in performing evidence-gathering procedures, the practitioner is expected to observe ______________.

A

cost-benefit consideration.

24
Q

in case there is a significant evidence-gathering procedure that must be performed but involves high cost, the practitioner may:

A
  1. identify and perform alternative procedures that minimize the cost.
  2. in the absence of alternative procedures, the practitioner is still required to perform the procedures as long as he believes that performance of it is necessary and beneficial to the entire engagement.
25
Q

types of opinion

A
  1. unmodified/unqualified - presented fairly in all material respect.
  2. qualified - except for
  3. adverse - do not present fairly, in all material respect.
  4. disclaimer of opinion - we do not express a conclusion
26
Q

objective is a reduction in assurance engagement risk to an acceptably low level in the circumstances of the engagement as the basis for a positive form of expression of the practitioner’s conclusion.

A

reasonable assurance engagement

27
Q

objective is a reduction in assurance engagement risk to a level that is acceptable in circumstances of the engagement, but where the risk is grater than for a reasonable assurance engagement, as a basis for a negative form of expression of the practitioner’s conclusion.

A

limited assurance engagement

28
Q

procedures performed in reasonable assurance

A

-inquiry
-observation
-inspection
-analytical procedures
-confirmation
-reperformance
-recalculation

29
Q

procedures performed in limited assurance

A

-inquiry
-analytical procedures

30
Q

an engagement in which a practitioner is engaged to issue, or does issue a written communication that expresses a conclusion about the reliability of a written assertion that is the responsibility of another party.

A

attestation engagement

31
Q

an engagement in which the auditor provides a reasonable level of assurance that the subject matter is free from material misstatements.

A

audit engagement

32
Q

an engagement in which the auditor provides a moderate level of assurance that the information subject to the engagement is free of material misstatement

A

review engagement

33
Q

assurance engagement that the evaluation or measurement of the subject matter is performed by the responsible party, and the subject matter information is in the form of an assertion by the responsible party that us made available to the intended users.

A

assertion-based engagement

34
Q

assurance engagement that the practitioner either directly performs the evaluation or measurement of the subject matter or obtain a representation from the responsible party that has performed the evaluation that is not available to the intended users in the assurance reports

A

direct reporting assurance

35
Q

non-assurance engagements lack one or more of the elements of assurance engagements

true or false?

A

true

36
Q

engaged to carry out those procedures of an audit nature to which the auditor and the entity and any appropriate third parties have agreed and to report the FACTUAL FINDINGS

A

agreed-upon procedures

37
Q

non-assurance engagements:

A

a. agreed-upon procedures
b. compilation of financial and other info.
c. tax services r tax consulting
d. advisory services

38
Q

Global organization for accountancy profession. The org founded in in 1977 and is comprised of more than 175 member and associate organization in 130 countries and jurisdiction, representing nearly 3 million professional accountant.

A

International federation of accountants (IFAC)

39
Q

Philippine standard on Auditing

A

Audit in historical financial information

40
Q

Philippine standard on review engagement

A

Review of historical financial information

41
Q

Philippine standard on assurance engagement (PSAE)

A

Assurance engagement dealing with subject matter other than historical financial information

42
Q

Philippine standard on related services (PSRS)

A

Agreed upon procedures information and other related services engagement as specified by AASC

43
Q

True or False:

PSAs, PSREs, PSAEs and PSRSs are collectively referred to as the AASC’s Engagement Standards.

A

True

44
Q

True or false:

Philippine Standards on Quality Management (PSQM) are to be applied for all services falling
under the AASC’s engagement standards.

A

True

45
Q

True or false

Philippine Standards are applicable to engagements in the Public Sector

A

True

Auditing Theory (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions