Introduction/Evaluation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does the Offence against the Person Act 1861 define?

A

ABH
GBH
GBH with intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

List the order of non-fatal offences…

A
Assault
Battery
ABH
GBH
Causing GBH or wounding with intent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What piece of legislation are most non-fatal offences defined under?

A

Offences against the Persons Act 1861

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why do the police bring a case to the Crown Prosecution Service?

A

To decide is there is a charge/prosecution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Briefly, what are the evaluation points?

A
Act is outdated 
No statutory definitions
Sentence structure is chaotic 
S18 is very complex 
Problems with mental health elements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain the evaluation point of the act being outdated…

A

The offences against a person act was passed in 1861, the language is outdated and confusing for a jury. It needs modernising and simplifying.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the no statutory definitions evaluation point…

A

There are no statutory definitions of assault, battery, wound and grievous harm which can make it difficult to distinguish which category an injury/crime truly falls into

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the problems with mental health elements evaluation point…

A

It is out of date in understanding mental health, it only covers bodily harm, not psychological harm.

However, case law has begun to plug this gap e.g chan-fool

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain sentence structure benign chaotic evaluation point…

A

A defendant may be sentenced to 6 months imprisonment for common assault or batter but 5 years for ABH even though the mens era is identical. S20 is meant to be more serious that S47 but they hold the same maximum sentence.
This all seems very illogical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Briefly, what are the evaluation points?

A
Act is outdated 
No statutory definitions
Sentence structure is chaotic 
S18 is very complex 
Problems with mental health elements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the evaluation point of the act being outdated…

A

The offences against a person act was passed in 1861, the language is outdated and confusing for a jury. It needs modernising and simplifying.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the no statutory definitions evaluation point…

A

There are no statutory definitions of assault, battery, wound and grievous harm which can make it difficult to distinguish which category an injury/crime truly falls into

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the problems with mental health elements evaluation point…

A

It is out of date in understanding mental health, it only covers bodily harm, not psychological harm.

However, case law has begun to plug this gap e.g chan-fool

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain sentence structure benign chaotic evaluation point…

A

A defendant may be sentenced to 6 months imprisonment for common assault or batter but 5 years for ABH even though the mens era is identical. S20 is meant to be more serious that S47 but they hold the same maximum sentence.
This all seems very illogical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How was reform been suggested?

A

The draft of offences against the persons bill 1998

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is the draft of the offences against the persons bill 1998 reformed?

A

There is a clearer hierarchy of offences e.g
Intentionally causing serious injury - maximum sentence would be life
Intentionally or reckless applying force causing another to believe application of force imminent - a summary offence with a maximum of 6 months imprisonment