Introduction Flashcards

1
Q

What stage in the policy cycle is this?

A

The last stage, but doesn’t have to be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Policy evaluation can take two forms, what are they ?

A

Retrospective ex- post after policy implementation of what works and what doesn’t
prospective ex-ante can evaluate a policy before it comes to fruition, part of your decision making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the causal mechanism, the ‘how’ ?

A

Is all about learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are we learning through evaluation?

A

How do we learn for what goes well and what doesn’t How do we identify what is good and what is bad.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why is it more nuanced and complex than just identifying what is right and what is wrong?

A

it is a massively political process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Do all policymakers agree on what is good and what is bad?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Government interest is focused on…

A

what works?

outcomes of policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What works is not the same for every political party or every successive government in terms of policy why?

A

Because ‘what works’ is highly political and often based on ideology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened in the 1960s-1970s in terms of concern?

A

growing concern about the effectiveness of public policy and governance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

did people care about implementation studies PRIOR to the 1960s/70s?

A

No, thought implementation was last stage in policy cycle. It was assumed that because it had gone around the stages of the policy cycle that it was going to work well.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened after the 1970s in terms of analysis?

What was not the end

A

People became more sophisticated in their analysis and realised that policy implementation was not the end.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

implementation studies; what is the implementation gap ?

A

The gap between the policy objectives and what actually happens when the policy is implemented.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is rare in policy implementation?

A

that policies are perfectly implemented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When was it realised that implementation was not the final stage?
What kind of period?
What do we need to be concerned about in reference to policy?

A

enlightened period of the 1960s and 70s
The effectiveness of policy once implemented as it perfect implementation is rare, objectives are often not achieved (implementation gap)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the evaluative approach like in the 1980s?

A

It was fragmented, lots of people doing different things, not cohesive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happened to evaluative approach of 1990s?

A

It was all about an evidence based approach of what works and what doesn’t. Blair and his government spoke about how they would look at what policies worked rather than deriving from ideology.

17
Q

What type of policies was Blair interested in?

A

policies that were clearly and demonstrably effective.

18
Q

What centres started springing up in 2010?

A

“What works” centres, lots of different organisations evaluators working in this field around evidence based policy making.

19
Q

Why is evidence based policy not objective?

What type of process.

A

because its not evaluated in a vacuum, it will always be interpreted and therefore its a political process.

20
Q

What are you bounded by in evidence based policy?

A

bounded by your own previous experience and prior knowledge, norms and values.

21
Q

Who are the two main types of evaluators?

A

Analytical civil servants

External advisors in Policy Appraisal

22
Q

Where do analytical civil servants do?

Think of issues

A

they sit in government, dealing with day to day problem solving, look for solutions of rising issues, dealing with issues at the hand.

23
Q

What are civil servants commissioned to report on?

A

special projects

24
Q

Who do analytical civil servants often bring in when working on projects?
Why else would they bring in other people?

A

External experts.

To provide evidence and collate it for the government.

25
Q

What is the result / final outcome of all analytical civil servants special projects?

A

Conducting impact assessments that show possible implications of Policies.

26
Q

External advisors in Policy Appraisal are also known as ?

A

Experts in their field.

27
Q

Governments often do not have the time to pay attention or … to deal with lots of technical issues

A

expertise.

28
Q

What are the two interrelated but important democratic features that external advisors bring ?

A

Independence and Transparency

29
Q

Why are external advisors in policy appraisal independent?

A

because they should be free from political interference in their work, work independently.

30
Q

Why is the independence of external policy advisors debatable?

A

Because experts are often not politically neutral and often close affiliations with government

31
Q

In principle, should external advisors be more independent or less independent than government evaluating themselves.

A

in principle more independent.

32
Q

Why are external advisors often promoting transparency and openness?
What should their government advice be open to?

A

Scientific advice to government should be made publicly available so us, engaged policy scholars and general public can have the information.

33
Q

What should government not do on the scientific advice given by independent advisors before publication?

A

not prejudge the advice or reject before publication because its their own experience as a leading expert in their field. should not have personal objection to.

34
Q

But what happens if government does not like the advice given? (think of professor Nutt)

A

will not always listen or like what they hear?

35
Q

What does the government not liking evaluation advice call into question?

A

the whole root of policy evaluation and the utility of it.

36
Q

What type of enquiries are incredibly problematic?

A

Public ones.