Introduction Flashcards
What stage in the policy cycle is this?
The last stage, but doesn’t have to be
Policy evaluation can take two forms, what are they ?
Retrospective ex- post after policy implementation of what works and what doesn’t
prospective ex-ante can evaluate a policy before it comes to fruition, part of your decision making.
What is the causal mechanism, the ‘how’ ?
Is all about learning.
What are we learning through evaluation?
How do we learn for what goes well and what doesn’t How do we identify what is good and what is bad.
Why is it more nuanced and complex than just identifying what is right and what is wrong?
it is a massively political process.
Do all policymakers agree on what is good and what is bad?
No.
Government interest is focused on…
what works?
outcomes of policy
What works is not the same for every political party or every successive government in terms of policy why?
Because ‘what works’ is highly political and often based on ideology.
What happened in the 1960s-1970s in terms of concern?
growing concern about the effectiveness of public policy and governance
did people care about implementation studies PRIOR to the 1960s/70s?
No, thought implementation was last stage in policy cycle. It was assumed that because it had gone around the stages of the policy cycle that it was going to work well.
What happened after the 1970s in terms of analysis?
What was not the end
People became more sophisticated in their analysis and realised that policy implementation was not the end.
implementation studies; what is the implementation gap ?
The gap between the policy objectives and what actually happens when the policy is implemented.
What is rare in policy implementation?
that policies are perfectly implemented
When was it realised that implementation was not the final stage?
What kind of period?
What do we need to be concerned about in reference to policy?
enlightened period of the 1960s and 70s
The effectiveness of policy once implemented as it perfect implementation is rare, objectives are often not achieved (implementation gap)
What was the evaluative approach like in the 1980s?
It was fragmented, lots of people doing different things, not cohesive.