Introduction Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Explain mens rea and actus reus in terms of duress…

A

The defendant admits to committing the actus reus of the crime with the required mens rea but he did it because he had no choice and was faced with threats of serious injury or death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the defence recognised as?

A

“A concession to human frailty”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In which case was the defence of duress described as ‘a concession to human frailty’?

A

R v Howe (1989)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case took place in 1989?

A

R v Howe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In what year was the case of R v Howe?

A

1989

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was said in the case of R v Howe (1989)

A

The the defence is recognised as a “concession to human frailty”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the case of R v Howe (1989) relevant to?

A

The introduction of duress and the defence being recognised as a “concession to human frailty”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What situations does the defence of duress cover?

A

A situation where a defendant is forced/feels compelled to commit a criminal offence because of threats by a person or threat of the circumstance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the effect of a successful plea?

A

An acquittal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does the type of offence committed affect of the defence is available to the defendant?

A

The defence is only available if the defendant commits an offence of the type that was nominated by the person making the threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case illustrates the defendant needing to commit the crime which was issued by the person making the threat?

A

R v Cole (1994)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What case happened in 1994?

A

R v Cole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In what year did the case of R v Cole happen?

A

1994

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened in the case of R v Cole (1994)?

A

The defendant robbed a building society to repay his debt as he and his family were threatened.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the outcome of R v Cole (1994)?

A

The court upheld his robbery conviction because the those who threatened him didn’t say ‘rob a building society or else’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the case of R v Cole (1994) relevant to?

A

That the defence is only available if the defendant has committed the crime nominated by the person issuing the threat.

17
Q

In terms of evaluation, what does the case of R v Cole (1994) illustrate?

A

That the defence has a limited scope, this is good because it means people cannot manipulate the justice system and use the defence when they were not actually forced. This help upholds public policy.

18
Q

What is duress of circumstances?

A

When the threat comes from the situation/circumstance rather than a direct threat

19
Q

What case is related to duress of circumstances?

A

R v Conway (1988)

20
Q

What is the case of R v Conway (1988) relevant to?

A

Duress of circumstances

21
Q

What case took place in 1988?

A

R v Conway

22
Q

In what year did the case of R v Conway happen?

A

1988

23
Q

What happened in the case of R v Conway (1988)?

A

The defender drove a car at a high speed to escape two men who he thought were about to attack his passenger

24
Q

What was the outcome of R v Conway (1988)?

A

The court quashed his conviction saying the defence of duress should have been available to him

25
Q

In terms of evaluation, what does the case of R v Cole (1994) illustrate?

A

That the defence has a limited scope, this is good because it means people cannot manipulate the justice system and use the defence when they were not actually forced. This help upholds public policy.

26
Q

What is duress of circumstances?

A

When the threat comes from the situation/circumstance rather than a direct threat

27
Q

What case is related to duress of circumstances?

A

R v Conway (1988)

28
Q

What is the case of R v Conway (1988) relevant to?

A

Duress of circumstances

29
Q

What case took place in 1988?

A

R v Conway

30
Q

In what year did the case of R v Conway happen?

A

1988

31
Q

What happened in the case of R v Conway (1988)?

A

The defender drove a car at a high speed to escape two men who he thought were about to attack his passenger

32
Q

What was the outcome of R v Conway (1988)?

A

The court quashed his conviction saying the defence of duress should have been available to him