Introduction Flashcards
What is a contract?
A contract is a legal enforcement of agreements and promises OR an undertaking by someone (unilateral ‘promise’)
Are all agreement contracts?
No
What are the four components of a contract?
- Notion of agreement
- Notion of bargain
- Mutuality - quid pro quo - doing something and getting something in return (like an oyster trip)
- Creation of legal liability - when something goes wrong, you as a consumer have rights (TFL, if charged too much, you can get a refund)
What are the four components of a VALID contract?
- Offer
- Acceptance
- Consideration
- Intention to create legal relations
What is acceptance?
Acceptance is a ‘final unqualified expression of assent to all the terms of an offer’
How can acceptance be communicated? (mode of acceptance)
Acceptance can be communicated in 3 ways
1. Words (orally) verbal contract
2. In writing (written contract)
3. Conduct
Acceptance must match the terms of the offer and must be made in response to the offer
How must acceptance be communicated between parties?
Holwell Securities Ltd v Hughes [1974] - acceptance should be communicated to the offerer
Entores v Miles Far East Corp [1955] - communication should be received by the offerer
Are there any exceptions to the rule of communication of acceptance?
Yes, three exceptions to the rule.
1. Silence - Felthouse v Bindley [1862] - if you accept the offer and the offerer does not hear you, the contract is void - has not been entered or completed.
2. The Postal Rule - Adams v Lindsell - post carries risk of delay or non-delivery - TPR places burden of risk on the offerer - unless they take steps to guard against it (stamped delivery)
3. Instantaneous communications - TPR does not apply. Contract via email, when does acceptance take place? When you send the email? Or when the party receives the email? Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping (The Parmela) [1995]
What is a counter-offer?
An offer which counters the original offer
What is a conditional acceptance?
When you accept a deal but wish to consult a third party or advice regarding the nature of the contract. It is an expression of future intention to enter a contract
How does a counter-offer differ from a conditional acceptance?
The case of Alpenstow Ltd v Regalian Properties plc [1985] - if you do not accept the terms as they are from the beginning and propose a counter-offer, the seller can refuse the sale if you were to return and offer to pay the original offer price
What is consideration?
Currie v Misa [1875] - “consideration is the price for which the promise of the other is bought. It must be ‘something of value’ which is recognised by the courts as amounting to consideration”
For there to be an enforceable agreement, each party must gain something from the agreement. This something is consideration.
What are the three types of consideration?
- Executory - the contract exists and both parties assume rights and liabilities - promises to be performed in the future
- Executed - parties have done all that was required of them.
Past - NOT GOOD OR VALID CONSIDERATION - Roscoria v Thomas [1842] E.g. you do something for your neighbour without discussing any deal and after completing, your neighbour said she would give you £100. She is under no obligation to do this, as you have already completed the action without discussing the deal
Are there any exceptions to the past consideration rule?
Yes, Lamplight v Brathwait [1615] - the courts may be prepared to find a consideration where the past service is preceded by D’s requested performance - for the exception to apply, the parties must have assumed that the service would be paid or rewarded in some way (Re Casey’s Patents 1892)
Consideration must move from the promise - only a person who has provided consideration in return for a promise may enforce that promise as a contract - Tweddle v Atkinson [1861]
Does consideration need to be of equal value?
No, the contract does not need to be of equal value, just needs to be SOME. E.g. selling a Ferrari for £1, courts will not interfere with what the parties have negotiated.
Thomas v Thomas [1842]
Chappel v Nestle [1960]