Introduction Flashcards
At the twenty-first Conference of the Parties (COP21), 195 nations
committed to “holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above preindustrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change
Describe graph
*
Our assessment begins with decomposing the term adequacy into three crucial components, namely
necessity, feasibility, simplicity
necessity
A straightforward interpretation then emerges: “GHG emissions that would modify the character of the climate system in a way that creates intolerable risks for humankind must be avoided.”
As a sensible conclusion, the Holocene mode of operation of the planetary environmental machinery needs to be preserved.
Today, Earth system science has come of age and can provide robust evidence for the intuitive assumption that it is not a good idea to leave the “safe operating space” of humanity6,7
. The keywords in this context are non-linearity and irreversibility. Impacts research indicates that unbridled anthropogenic climate change would be most likely to play out in a disruptive and irreparable wayy.
feasibility
The Paris climate target is highly ambitious, if not aspirational. The long lifetime of CO2 in the atmosphere implies a strictly limited total carbon budget and thus forces us to reach zero emissions — if warming is to be stopped at all
This assessment concludes that the 2 °C guardrail can be respected at moderate cost under certain (not entirely unreasonable) assumptions, including the realization of ‘negative-emissions’ schemes.
However, the enormous challenges associated with massive atmospheric CO2 removal or negative emissions have been highlighted by several experts
We think that a better chance to deliver on the Paris promises can be generated by an alternative and more plausible route: in order to avoid the need to recourse to negative emissions as a lateregrets magic bullet (with questionable outcome), renewable energies and efficiency technologies could be scaled up exponentially, more rapidly than envisaged in the integrated assessment models behind the IPCC scenarios
We expect that such a ‘technical explosion’ will be matched by an ‘induced implosion’ of the incumbent industrial metabolism nourished by coal, oil and gas
Among the driving processes, investment dynamics is crucial, and this dynamic might in fact transgress its own tipping point in response to the narrative transpiring from Paris. This has often been described as the bursting of the ‘carbon bubble’
simplicity
The latter dimension is often ignored, but is tremendously important for political recognition and implementation, as we shall explain. The feasibility question has been studied thoroughly not least by the IPCC in its Fifth Assessment Report2 (AR5). The preliminary conclusion is that the 2 °C line may be held with remarkably low economic cost, if only the political will can be mustered.
However, the feasibility issue is well worth revisiting in light of the Paris aspiration to limit warming to 1.5 °C. We begin, however, by reviewing the necessity of a global warming limit, guided by the latest insights from climate science.
1.5-2 difference
Significant impacts of climate change are projected already for a warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, and have been shown to rise substantially difference between 1.5 °C and 2 °C of global warming is apparent when considering long-term sea-level rise: Even holding global warming to 2 °C may lead to 2–3 metres of rise by the year 2300, still rising then at twice the rate as today, whereas a 1.5 °C scenario could see the peak sea level at a median estimate of 1.5 m above 2000
beyond 2 degrees
Beyond 2 °C the course would be set for a complete deglaciation of the Northern Hemisphere, threatening the survival of many coastal cities and island nations. Global food supply would be jeopardized by novel extreme-event regimes, and major ecosystems such as coral reefs forced into extinction14. Yet, staying within the Paris target range, the overall Earth system dynamics would remain largely intact. Progressing into the third domain (D4) on the other hand, with global warming reaching 3–5 °C, would seriously harm most tipping elements. For warming levels beyond this range (spanning the fourth domain D8), the world as we know it would be bound to disappear.
tipping points
These critical entities have been called tipping elements8 , since their character is closely related to certain pockets of planetary state space. This means that those elements may be destroyed, damaged or transmuted if critical threshold values (tipping points) of key environmental parameters are transgressed
analysis
his becomes clear when one moves from the conventional, yet valuable, realms of analysis (“How will wheat yields vary with changes in local temperature, precipitation, insolation etc?”) to the macro-components, mega-patterns and super-ecosystems that determine how the climate system functions as a whole (“When will the Greenland Ice Sheet collapse under progressive global warming?”).
solar wind costs
A recent study30 confirms that the deployment of solar and wind power capacities worldwide has increased exponentially while the costs of solar and wind power generation have fallen in a similarly non-linear fashion
3 scenarios
First, there is the classical hypothesis that a strong climate agreement paves the way towards carbonpricing instruments that will be adopted by more and more nation states in the medium term. As a consequence, investors anticipating the so-induced rise in fossil business costs should make the rational choice to opt out of that business.
Second, there is a growing risk/chance that morals are going to interfere significantly with economics. The so-called divestment campaign has become a global social movement that demands leaving most of the fossil fuel resources in the ground21,22. In public, many business leaders and government officials still try to ridicule or dismiss this sentiment surge within civil society. Yet in private conversations they admit their worries that particularly institutional investors (such as pension funds or big foundations) might be ‘infected’ by the divestment virus.
Third, there is Schumpeter’s ‘creative destruction’ (According to Schumpeter, the “gale of creative destruction” describes the “process of industrial mutation that continuously revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one”.)that might instigate a systemic innovation of the existing economic structures. Let us briefly elaborate on this: when studying industrial history for a better understanding of transformational processes, one encounters certain evidence for a semi-quantitative rule, known as Pareto Principle23, which states that in heterogeneous community production systems, roughly 80% of the total output is typically generated by roughly 20% of the individual units involved
graph red and blue
slide 3
what can you study connected to geese?
Geese are key species in Arctic
ecosystems, linking Europe with
the Arctic
Behaviour, physiology and population Vegetation Predation Health and immune system Parasites Pollution
anomalies map
the map slide 15