Introducition to Nutrition Assessment Flashcards

1
Q

Health status of an
individual or population
groups as influenced by
their intake and utilization
of nutrients, which
change throughout the life
cycle

A

Nutritional Status or Nutriture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

THE BODY HAS AN ADEQUATE
SUPPLY OF ESSENTIAL
NUTRIENTS THAT ARE
EFFICIENTLY UTILIZED SUCH
THAT GROWTH AND GOOD
HEALTH ARE MAINTAINED AT
THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE LEVEL

A

Good or Optimal Nutrition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

pathological state due to a
relative or an absolute
deficiency or excess of
essential nutrients at the
cellular level for a long
period of time.

The condition manifests
itself by physical,
physiological and
biochemical abnormalities

A

MALNUTRITION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

2 Forms of Malnutrition

A

UNDERNUTRITION
OVERNUTRITION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

a deficiency state due to lack of
calories and or one or more of
the essential nutrients

A

UNDERNUTRITION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

refers to an excess of one or more nutrients but usually due to an excess of energy

A

OVERNUTRITION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

a process to identify an individual
who is malnourished or who is at
risk for malnutrition to determine
if a detailed nutrition assessment
is indicated

A

NUTRITION SCREENING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

nutrition screening can be done by any member of the health-care team such as:

A

dietitian, dietetic technician, dietary manager, nurse, or physician

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The Academy of Nutrition
and Dietetics defines
as
“a systematic method for
obtaining, verifying, and
interpreting data needed to
identify nutrition-related
problems, their causes and
their significance

A

NUTRITION ASSESSMENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

nutrition assessment abcd

A

*Anthropometric
*Biochemical
*Dietary
*Clinical
*Nutrition Focused Physical Exam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

*Identify individual who ismalnourished
* at risk of malnutrition

Objectives:
* predict probability of outcome
due to nutritional factor
* predict if nutritional
intervention will be beneficial

A

NUTRITION SCREENING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Comprehensive approach to
define nutrition status:
A, B, C, D

Objectives:
* Determine nutrition status
* formulate an appropriate
nutrition care plan

A

NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

5 Nutrtion Screening tools

A
  1. Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)-Nestle
  2. Nutrition Screening Initiative - DETERMINE checklist
  3. MUST (Malnutrition Universal
    Screening Tool)
  4. MST (Malnutrition Screening Tool)
  5. Nutrition Risk Screenin
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

forms of Mini Nutritional Assessment (Nestle)

A

SCREENING

ASSESSMENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  • BMI (kg/m2)
  • Weight loss in past 3 months
  • Acute illness or major stress
    in past 3 months
  • Mobility
  • Dementia or depression
  • Has appetite & food intake
    decreased in past 3 months
A

Mini Nutritional Assessment (Nestle) – Screening Part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

MNA SCREENING PART

Screening score is normal, not at risk, no need to complete assessment

A

12 points or greater

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

MNA SCREENING PART

Screening score means possible malnutrition, continue assessment

A

11 points or below

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Scoring system
Full MNA -
>/= 24 : normal nutrition

  • < 24 : Further assessment and
    intervention
    Limitations:
  • Not capable of covering special aspects of
    malnutrition
    (eg; insufficient micronutrient intake)
  • Not suitable for pt receiving enteral tube feeding & no oral foods
  • Not suitable for all ages groups and disease
    states.
A

Mini Nutritional Assessment nestle-screening part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Design to increase community
dwelling elders awareness about
health and nutrition

  • Self-administered checklist
    determines need for referral to a
    health care professional
  • Not clinically validated
  • Suitable for community / out
    patient
A

Nutrition Screening
Initiative - DETERMINE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Nutrition Screening
Initiative - DETERMINE

A

Disease
Eating poorly
Tooth Loss/ Mouth Pain
Economic hardship
Reduce social contact
Multiple medicines
Involuntary weight loss/gain
Need assistance in Self-care
Elder year above age 80

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

scoring system in NUT SCREENING INITIATIVE DETERMINE

  • Good! Rechecked nutritional score in 6 months
A

0-2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

scoring system in NUT SCREENING INITIATIVE DETERMINE

  • You are at moderate nutritional risk
    -Rechecked nutritional score in 3
A

3-5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

scoring system in NUT SCREENING INITIATIVE DETERMINE

You are at high nutritional risk
Bring this checklist when you see
health care professionals and ask
for help to improve your nutritional
health.

A

> /= 6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q
  • Developed by BAPEN, UK
  • A practical, reliable, validated tool for nutrition screening
  • Allows comparable nutritional
    screening across different care
    settings by different health
    professionals
  • primary care, home, acute care,
    long term care (suitable both out-pt and in hospital setting)
A

MALNUTRITION UNIVERSAL SCREENING TOOLS (MUST)

25
MUST Recommended Management Guidelines
0 = Low risk: Routine Care 1 = Medium risk: Observe >/= 2 = High Risk: Treat
26
MUST RMG repeat screening - hospital: weekly - care homes: monthly - community: annually for special group eg; >75yr
0 = Low risk: Routine Care
27
MUST RMG repeat screening - hospital: weekly - care homes: monthly - community: annually for special group eg; >75yr
1 = Medium risk: Observe
28
MUST RMG - hospital: refer to dietitian/ implement local policies. - care homes: (as for hospital) - community: (as for hospital
>/= 2 = High Risk: Treat
29
1. Have you lost weight recently without trying? No 0 Unsure 2 If yes, how much weight (kg) have you lost? 1-5 1 6-10 2 11- 15 3 > 15 4 Unsure 2 2. Have you been eating poorly because of a decreased appetite? No 0 Yes 1 Total Score of 2 or more = patient at risk of malnutrition
MALNUTRITION SCREENING TOOLS OR MST
30
MST score Eating well with no recent weight loss RESCREEN If length of stay 7 days or more and weekly thereafter
Low risk MST= 0-1
31
MST score Eating poorly or recent weight loss of
Medium risk MST = 2-3
32
MST score Eating poorly plus recent weight loss < 13 lb RECOMMENDED ORAL NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENT Dietary consult within 24 hrs
High risk
33
• Developed by Kondrup et al –ESPEN • Used retrospective analysis of RCT (adults) Based on concept of: Indications for nutrition support are a) the severity of undernutrition b) the increase of nutritional requirements from the disease Screen includes measures of current potential under nutrition and disease severity
NUTRITION RISK SCREENING 2002
34
Strengths: • Proven to be a practical tool in the hospital setting • Can be facilitated by a range of healthcare workers • It meant to cover all possible pt categories in a hospital Limitation: • May not effectively screen for deficiencies or toxicities of certain micronutrients
Nutrional Risk Screening 2002
35
Immediate • Minimum measurements • Least expense • Concise information • Can be facilitated by any member of health care team
Nutrition screening
36
• Longer time • More measurements • More expense • In – depth information • Requires greater expertise in its facilitation
Nutritional Assessment
37
The objectives of the survey are to determine and evaluate the food intakes, nutrition and health status of Filipinos, and provide official statistics on food, nutrition and health situations of the country
Nutrition Survey
38
OBJECTIVES • To establish baseline nutritional data and/or ascertain the overall nutritional status of the population • To identify and describe those population subgroups at-risk to chronic malnutrition
Nutrition survey
39
Identifies • WHO are malnourished • HOW MANY are malnourished • WHERE are they BUT does not give information on… • WHAT type of malnutrition exists (if only weight-for-age indicator is used) • WHY does it exist
Nutrition survey
40
• Continuous monitoring of the nutritional status of selected population groups • Data are collected, analyzed, and utilized for an extended period of time • Identify possible causes of malnutrition
Nutrition surveillance
41
Data obtained can be used to formulate and initiate intervention measures at the population and subpopulation level • Called ‘monitoring’ when carried out on selected high-risk individual Results obtained can be used for: a. Long term planning b. timely warning c. Program management
Nutrition surveillance
42
OBJECTIVES: • To promote decisions by governments concerning priorities and disposal of resources • To formulate predictions on the basis of current trends • To evaluate the effectiveness of nutrition programs
Nutrition surveillance
43
Initially identifies: • WHO are malnourished • HOW MANY are malnourished • WHERE are they • WHAT type of malnutrition exists(depends on indicator used) During monitoring it will answer: • WHY it exists
Nutrition surveillance
44
Direct Method of Nutrition Assessment
A- anthropometry B – Biochemical C – Clinical D – Dietary
45
Indirect methods of Nutrition Assessment
E – Ecological factors F- Functional assessment Vital statistics
46
This is the measurement of body height, weight & proportions. • It is an essential component of clinical examination of infants, children & pregnant women. • It is used to evaluate both under & over nutrition
Anthropometry
47
Other anthropometric Measurements
•Mid-arm circumference • Skin fold thickness • Head circumference • Head/chest ratio • Hip/waist ratio
48
Biochemical or laboratory methods include measuring a nutrient or its metabolite in: • Blood • feces • urine • measuring a variety of other components in blood and other tissues that have a relationship to nutritional status
Biochemical
49
Hemoglobin estimation is the most important test, & useful index of the overall state of nutrition. Beside anemia it also tells about protein & trace element nutrition. • Stool examination for the presence of ova and/or intestinal parasites • Urine dipstick & microscopy for albumin, sugar and blood
Biochemical
50
It is the simplest & most practical method of ascertaining the nutritional status of a group of individuals • It utilizes a number of physical signs, (specific & non specific), that are known to be associated with malnutrition and deficiency of vitamins & micronutrients.
Clinical
51
General clinical examination, with special attention to organs like hair, angles of the mouth, gums, nails, skin, eyes, tongue, muscles, bones, & thyroid gland
Clinical
52
In this, the methods generally involve surveys measuring the quantity of the individual foods and beverages consumed during the course of one to several days or assessing the pattern of food use during the previous several months.
Dietary
53
Nutritional intake of humans is assessed by five different methods. These are: • 24 hours dietary recall • Food frequency questionnaire • Dietary history since early life • Food diary technique • Observed food consumption
Dietary
54
Nutritional intake of humans is assessed by five different methods. These are: • 24 hours dietary recall • Food frequency questionnaire • Dietary history since early life • Food dairy technique • Observed food consumption
Ecological Factors
55
This is an indirect method of assessing food consumption, in which supplies are related to census population to derive levels of food consumption in terms of per capita supply availability
Food Balance Sheet
56
Advantage: This method is cheaper and probably simpler than any method of direct assessment. This method give indication of the general pattern of food consumption in the country
Balance sheet
57
Food consumption patterns are likely to vary among various socioeconomic groups. Family size, occupation, income, education, customs, cultural pattern in relation to feeding practices of consumption patterns.
Socio-economic factor
58
Primary health care services, feeding and immunization programs should also be taken into consideration.
Health and Educational services
59
These include parasitic, bacterial, and viral infections which precipitate malnutrition. It is necessary to make an “ecological diagnosis” of various factors influencing nutrition in the community before it is possible to put into effect measures for the prevention and control of malnutrition.
Condutioning Influences