intro to ethics and law Flashcards
how are doctors/ the profession regarded?
privileged position - regarded as professionals by public and peers
studies show that doctors are the most trusted professions despite high profile failings over years
shipman scandal
- Dr. Harold Shipman: British GP convicted of murdering at least 15 patients (possibly up to 250).
- Method: Used lethal doses of painkillers (e.g., diamorphine).
- Years active: 1970s to 1998.
- Motive: Believed to be a desire for power and control.
- Discovery: His killings went unnoticed due to his trusted reputation.
- Conviction: Arrested in 1998, convicted in 2000, life sentence.
- Impact: Led to reforms in medical practices and prescription controls. => + writing death certificates
retained organs - alder hey
- Alder Hey Scandal: In the late 1990s, it was revealed that Alder Hey Children’s Hospital in Liverpool had retained organs from deceased children without proper consent.
- Organs involved: Included hearts, brains, and other body parts.
- Issue: Parents were not informed, and organs were often kept for medical research or without legal permission.
- Investigation: Led to public outrage and an inquiry into hospital practices.
- Outcome: The Human Tissue Act 2004 was introduced to regulate the use and retention of human tissue. The scandal raised awareness of ethical standards in healthcare and consent.
ian patterson
- Ian Paterson Scandal: British surgeon convicted of performing unnecessary and harmful surgeries.
- Crimes: He carried out procedures like mastectomies and breast cancer surgeries on patients who didn’t need them.
- Motivation: For personal gain, including financial incentives and to gain attention.
- Victims: Over 1,000 patients were affected, many suffering physical and emotional harm.
- Exposure: His actions were uncovered in 2017, leading to his conviction for 17 counts of wounding with intent and 3 counts of manslaughter.
- Outcome: Paterson was sentenced to 20 years in prison. The scandal led to calls for reforms in healthcare regulation and patient safety.
infected blood inquiry
- Infected Blood Scandal: A UK public health disaster from the 1970s to 1990s, where patients were given contaminated blood products.
- Cause: Blood products, like clotting factors for hemophiliacs, were infected with HIV and Hepatitis C.
- Victims: Over 5,000 people, including hemophiliacs and others, were infected.
- Impact: Many patients suffered severe health issues, and hundreds died.
- Injustice: The infected blood was often imported from abroad without proper screening.
- Inquiry: The Infected Blood Inquiry was launched in 2017 to investigate the events, identify accountability, and compensate victims.
- Outcome: Ongoing efforts to provide justice for victims, including compensation and public apologies.
what is a professional
someone who can do best work when doesnt feel like it
professionalism characteristics
expertise
standards
respectability
responsibility
reliability
probity <=> honesty
conduct
respect
who regulates doctors in uk
when was it made
what does it do
GMC - general council of medical education and registration
founded 1858
uniformity of qualifications
representative self governance
what does GMC do
relevant guidance
- student version
who will they not register
achieving good medical practice
- student guidance - updated in sep
-> GMC won’t register medical graduates who are not fit to practice medicine.
guidance on what to be cautious about
what professionalism boundaries does this bring up
dont act in a sexual way towards patients or use position to pursue relationship
as a trusted professional do not use ur position to pursue sexual relationship with patient that come in a vulnerable position
dont express beliefs
what issue does this bring up
confidentiality
=> NEVER DISCLOSE WITHOUT CONSENT
or in public/ social media
never in public place/ no name
no photos
challenges to profession
patients have access to info so they want to be involved in decision making
increasing demand
ageing population
budgetary constraints
AI => embracing technology whilst being aware of medicolegal risks
controversy over new roles
what to do when mistake happens
ethical duty of candour
most patients want an explanation+ apology when smtg goes wrong