Intoxication - defence Flashcards

1
Q

What is the difference between a basic intent and specific intent crime?

A

Basic intentrefers to offences where eitherintentionor recklessness will satisfy mens rea.
Specific intentrefers to offences whereintentionis necessary to satisfy mens rea.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is alcohol a non-dangerous drug?

A

No! It is dangerous (R v Hardie)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the question to ask if D was voluntary intoxicated and committed a basic intent crime?

A

Would D have formed the mens rea if sober? (R v Coley)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the question to ask if D was voluntary intoxicated and committed a specific intent crime?

A

Defence of intoxication can be present
Did D still form the necessary mens rea? (R v Pordage)
Drunken intent is still intent (Kingston)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the question to ask if D was involuntary intoxicated?

A

Defence of intoxication can be present
Did D still form the necessary mens rea? (R v Pordage)
Drunken intent is still intent (Kingston)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How can intoxication influence self-defence?

A

If a defendant makes a drunken mistake as to the need to use self-defence, they cannot rely on that mistake.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How can intoxication influence loss of control?

A

Intoxication is no bar to a plea of loss of control

  • D’s drug or alcohol addiction can be taken into account in assessing the magnitude of the qualifying anger trigger if D was taunted about the addiction.
  • Normal person test- an intoxicated person is not precluded from using the defence. If D is addicted to drugs or alcohol this will be a characteristic given to the normal person but the normal person will still have normal levels of tolerance and self-restraint and be sober(Asmelash)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How can intoxication influence diminished responsibility?

A

Voluntary intoxication is not, on its own, capable of being relied upon for diminished responsibility (Dowds)
- If the defendant has an abnormality of mental functioning (AMF)andis voluntarily intoxicated it will affect diminished responsibility(Dietschmann)
○ AMF must provide an explanation for D’s conduct, even if it is not the only cause- alcohol can be another reason.
- If the defendant’s abnormality of mental functioningarises fromthe alcohol dependency syndrome (‘ADS’).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does intoxication influence consent?

A

Will not affect consent.

Jury will take into account whether D believes that V consented (even if D wrongly belied it due to intoxication)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does intoxication influence statutory defences?

A

Where there is a statutory defence that allows for an honest belief, the defendant will be able to use this defence even if their belief is due to their voluntary intoxication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly