Intoxication Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

DPP v Beard

A
  • D argued intoxication as a defence to murder.
  • Definition
  • D must be completely incapable of forming the mens rea for the defence to apply.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A-G for Northern Ireland v Gallagher

A
  • D decided to kill his wife and bought some whiskey and a knife.
  • He drank some of the whiskey before he killed her.
  • Definition
  • Mens rea was formed to kill his wife before the intoxication.
  • ‘Dutch courage’ is no defence - a drunken intent is still an intent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

DPP v Majewski

A
  • D drank excessive amounts of alcohol and took drugs.
  • He got into a fight.
  • Voluntary Intoxication and Basic Intent Crimes
  • His conviction of ABH was upheld due to his recklessness in getting intoxicated.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Kingston

A
  • D, a known, paedophile, drank a drugged coffee and went on to abuse a young boy as part of an attempt by others to blackmail D.
  • Involuntary Intoxication
  • Despite the involuntary intoxication, D still knew what he was doing; he just couldn’t stop himself.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Lipman

A
  • D and girlfriend took LSD causing hallucinations.
  • D killed his girlfriend mistaking her for snakes.
  • Intoxicated mistake
  • Charged with murder and manslaughter.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Jaggard v Dickinson

A
  • D was drunk broke into what she thought was her friends house who would consent to this, but it wasn’t.
  • Conviction quashed, S5 Criminal Damage Act 1971 allows honest belief that person who consented to damage or destruction as a lawful excuse to charge of criminal damage.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly