Intoxication

Question 0

Voluntary intoxication and specific intent crimes

Answer 0

Gallagher - intoxicated intent is still intent and not a defence
Lipman
Sheehan and Moore
Both former were negated and reduced to INVOL M

Question 1

What is the main element

Answer 1

Intoxication must negate the MR to be successful

Question 2

Voluntary intoxicated and basic intent

Answer 2

NEVER EVER A DEFENCE AS RECKLESSNESS CAN BE TRANSFERRED FROM BEING RECKLESS AS TO BE DRUNK AS IN MAJEWSKI

Question 3

Involuntary intoxication and specific intent crimes

Answer 3

Kingston - not a defence as mr wasn’t negated
Allen - must be totally involuntary
Can be a defence is mr negated

Question 4

Involuntary intoxication and basic intent crimes

Answer 4

Hardie can not be reckless nor intend as they didn’t realise the effect therefore can be a defence sometimes

Question 5

What can intoxicate one?

Answer 5

Drugs, alcohol