Intoxication Flashcards

1
Q

What is the defence of intoxication ?

A

Where D consumed alcohol, drugs or other noxious substance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What happens to a Ds MR if intoxication is involved ?

A

MR couldn’t be formed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the first element of intox.?

A

are they legally intox. ?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How can someone be legally intox. (2 ways and case) ?

A

automatism, can’t form MR, or merely drunk (D wouldn’t do if sober but knows doing it) (Heard)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does Sheehan V Moore say about legally intoxicated ?

A

drunken intent is still intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What helps to prove legally
intox. ?

A

evidence to show D had more than just a drink or 2 or small amount of drug

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Next element of intox. ?

A

Has intox. been caused involuntarily or voluntarily

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does R V Eatch say about vol./jnvol. ?

A

if any doubt, question of fact for jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is volountary intox. ?

A

D chooses to take 🍷, ❄️, or other substance out of own free will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is invol. intox. ?

A

D doesn’t know taken 🍷, ❄️ that will intox. them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does R V Hardie add for invol. ?

A

where D taken prescribed drug but had unexpected effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the 1st thing to consider if the intox. was voluntary ?

A

only a defence to specific intent crimes DPP V Beard (only intention)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happens if the D can form MR for a crime under vol. intox. ?

A

defence not available (Coley)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did R V Lipman say about vol. intox. ?

A

if there is a lower basic intent crime of specific one D charged w that and intox. no longer a defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happens if there is no basic intent version of a specific crime ?

A

can use intox. and acquitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does R V Gallagher say about dutch courage (Vol. Intox.) ?

A

if D only consumed to get courage to commit crime intox. not available

17
Q

How does DPP V Majewski show that basic intent crimes don’t work for intox. ?

A

recklessness of getting intox. is recklessness for comitting crime

18
Q

How did Richardson and Irwin differ the standards for normal basic intent crimes?

A

intox. available as D must also not realise risk had they not been drinking

19
Q

What happens if D was invol. intox. ?

A

will be acquitted as couldn’t form MR for crime

20
Q

Why would someone be charged if they were invol. intox. (case)?

A

if had MR before intox. (Kingston)