Interviews Flashcards
Interviews: In a nutshell
In sociological research, there are different types of interviews: structured interviews and unstructured interviews (including group interviews). Sociologists sometimes use semi-structured interviews to combine the elements of both. Structured interviews are favoured by positivists because they are rich in reliability and representativity, whereas unstructured interviews are favoured by interpretivists because they are rich in validity.
Structured interviews: What are they and who favours them?
The positivist favoured method of structured interviews involve face-to-face or over-the-phone delivery of a questionnaire. In turn, they use a list of pre-set questions designed by the researcher and asked of all interviewees in the same way.
Structured interviews: Advantages
- Practical - training interviewers is easy and cheap
- Practical - Cheap and easy to administer
- Representative - can reach a geographically wide research sample
- Results are easily quantifiable because they use closed-ended questions with coded answers
- Reliable - the structured process provides a ‘recipe’ for reproducibility
Structured interviews: Disadvantages
- Lack of validity: the use of closed-ended and pre-coded answers may not fit what the interviewee wishes to say
- Lack of validity: People may lie or exaggerate
Unstructured interviews: Who favours them and what are they?
The interpretivist favoured method of unstructured interviews mainly ask open-ended questions that produce qualitative data rich in meaning. There is a strong relationship built between the interviewer and the interviewee, which means the data is more likely to be valid.
Unstructured interviews: Advantages
- Rapport - the informality allows the interviewer to develop a relationship with the interviewee
- Flexibility - the interviewer is not restricted to a fixed set of questions
- Valid - they are flexible, due to how the conversation is not constrained by fixed questions - people can be more truthful
Unstructured interviews: Disadvantages
- Practical - time consuming, due to how unstructured interviews are typically longer, and expensive due to training interviewers in sensitivity
- Unrepresentative - due to small research samples, data obtained is not representative of the wider population
- Not reliable - due to how the questions are open, they cannot be easily repeated by another researcher. Additionally, the respondent’s ability to respond in the way they wish makes it impossible to clarify their responses.
Semi- structured interviews: What are they?
A qualitative method of inquiry that combines a pre-determined set of open questions (questions that prompt discussion) with the opportunity for the interviewer to explore particular themes or responses further.
Semi-structured interviews: Advantages
- Large amount of detail generated.
- Fairly flexible and sensitive.
- Easier to analyse than unstructured interviews.
Semi-structured interviews: Disadvantages
- Can’t guarantee honesty of participants.
- Cause and effect cannot be inferred.
- Flexibility of interview may lessen reliability.
- Open-ended questions are difficult to analyse.
- Difficult to compare answers.