interview questions Flashcards
Why do you want to be a doctor?
- myriad reasons
- suits my natural demeanour and traits. naturally caring person, cared for mum which cemented this.
- fortunate to have an analytical mind which means i’m quite adept at problem solving
- love science, studied at school, university. Interested in becoming an applied scientist in a role that involves a lot of people skills.
- i want to be pushed to the limits of my skill set academically, physically, emotionally, and be forced to make difficult decisions. This will foster growth.
- I want to work in a career that allows me to emotionally invest a little in my patients while also intellectually stimulating me.
- I’m fascinated by the progression that there will be in our lifetimes. So much has happened in the last 50 years, and I want to see what’s going to happen in the next 50. But I want to be doing this as a professional, not as an outsider.
- I’m fascinated with the body and mind and I hope to specialise in psychiatry. However I wasn’t interested in psychology because I want my understanding to come from a base of physiological and pharmacological knowledge.
What’s your biggest weakness?
- people are constantly in flux, weaknesses can improve, strengths can diminish, moods, personalities and beliefs can change.
- as a result, i wouldn’t say i have a fixed biggest weakness. I try to spent tiem being introspective on a fairly regular basis. This allows me to recalibrate, identify weaknesses and begin considering how to improve on them.
- over-empathising is a definitely weakness. I realised this was the case while working at a food bank.
- i’ve learned that taking a more utilitarian view helps me with this while allowing me to maintain compassion.
- further to this, considering virtue ethics too, there were some weeks where i was able to provide extra rations because i knew we had food that would expire.
- currently i’m struggling with a lack of spontaneity. owing to lockdown, studying for the GAMSAT and UCAT and having moved back from Canada to a town where i have no social circles, i have become very regimented and routine. Addressing this is more complex than you’d think. I need to organically make friends in my area first.
- i’m currently learning to schedule better.
- although i’ve always been reliable, i have mentally remembered what i need to get done and as i’m becoming busier, this is becoming more stressful. I’m starting to work on keeping a planner and also learning how to integrate this with remaining spontaneous.
What’s your biggest strength?
- Humility
- On paper, i know that i’m intelligent, both emotionally and academically and athletically talented.
- i don’t brag about these things or in any way feel that they elevate me above others.
- This is a strength as my natural demeanour comes across as likeable to most people.
- I’ve realised in the last few years how fortunate i am to be intelligent, and how useful having strong emotional intelligence has been as i find it fairly easy to empathise with and develop rapport with people.
- My demeanour.
I’m intelligent but also a compassionate and empathetic person and I believe I have strong emotional intelligence
This means I find it fairly easy to connect with others and make them feel at ease.
Emotionally investing in people around me also means I’m more likely to notice subtle changes in their behaviour or expressions which often leads to me being the the friend that’s turned to for advice. - This means that I function well within teams, it also means that in my groups of friends I tend to fall into the role of a leader, or the individual that others turn to for emotional support.
I believe these qualities will also lends themselves well to a career in medicine.
why southampton?
-curriculum based around clinical learning and self-directed study. This is how medical career would be.
- i like the similar approach you have to PBL. But as well as providing case information on paper, i like that you provide videos or actual patients as this will developed information extraction and general soft skills.
- i like that year 4 contains a psychiatry module in the form of a placement as i plan to specialise in this.
-
does euthanasia have a place in modern medicine?
- this is a complex issue that can’t be summed up with a black and white response
- legality and ethical considerations vary depending on which type of euthanasia. There is voluntary, involuntary, assisted and passive.
- autonomy and beneficence (in terminally ill patients that want to die with dignity) would suggest it does
- however, active euthanasia goes against the hippocratic oath.
- the swiss seem to believe it does, and this causes lots of british patients to travel abroad to undergo the process. if this is going to happen anyway, we should give consideration to allowing case by case decisions on euthanasia in the UK to allow people to die in their home nation.
- Ultimately i think it does, where it allows patients to die with dignity and brings an end to untreatable pain.
- There are so many arguements for and against.
-Allowing patients to die with dignity is definitely a reason I believe it should be considered.
however, we have the specialty of palliative care for this reason. And I’ve heard that a lot of healthcare workers in this field report that patients who claimed they wanted to die, later express joy that they continued living for a little longer. - I would also argue in terms of patient autonomy, that patients should be allowed to have the choice. To further this, there was a case in the past in which a woman argued that able bodied people can commit suicide, and so those who are physically unable should be given the same rights.
-The reason the courts gave against this however is that it’s not beaureacracy that’s preventing a patient taking their life, but instead their illness. - There is also the idea of a slippery slope, and that if we allow active euthanasia, then people may end their lives prematurely because of pressures such as feeling like a burden to their families. We could even see pressure for people to end their lives because of organ transplants.
- In terms of beneficence and non-maleficence, I would argue thought that sometimes the best thing to do for a patient is to allow them to die. Especially if they are in constant pain.
- My final thought is about dignities in switzerland. The fact that we have patients who travel to Switzerland to undergo euthanasia means that their family may not be able to be with them at the end, and it may present issues in terms of burial or cremation. It might be more beneficent to allow patients the same options here in the uk.
- In terms of consequentialism, I could also argue that withdrawing life support (which is legal) has the exact same consequences as euthanasia.
- Overall this is very complex. I would say that I agree with passive euthanasia like withdrawing life support. Active I do feel is a bit of a slippery slope and if considered should be something that is decided case by case and has a panel of doctors or court come to a decision.
Do you agree with abortion?
I agree under the right conditions.
There are obviously a lot of complex considerations like foetal rights, mothers rights, fathers rights, the sanctity of life.
To me a large part of the decision is sentience. A line has to be drawn between embryo and foetus. This is a very difficult line to draw though. Neuroanatomical apparatus necessary to feel pain or sensation isn’t complete until around week 26 of pregnancy.
I know that in the uk we have 24 week abortion limit. Most reports I’ve read state that babies born before this stage have very low chances of survival and will almost always have disabilities.
I know most women have abortions by the 12 week stage, however it’s important to keep the limit at 24 weeks because reports state that some women struggle to be seen and this is the upper limit for where vulnerable women can be treated.
After this stage, it’s harder to argue that we’re not taking away a life as babies are much more likely to survive a premature birth at this age and are therefore more easy to see as autonomous beings.
Another consideration is beneficence and non-maleficence to the mother. We have a law in the uk that I agree with which states that abortions can only be carried out if they present less risk to the mother than continuing the pregnancy would. We have to consider the long term mental health effects that can arise from a terminated pregnancy.
Bodily rights of woman.
Women are disproportionately affected by pregnancy and gender equality is a consideration here. Not only do pregnant women have to carry baby to birth, they will have to care for it for at least 18 years afterwards. Men don’t ‘have’ to have the same responsibility.
We have to consider cases like rape. Forcing a woman to raise a child of their attacker will likely cause severe psychological issues. They will face cognitive dissonance over the combination of loving their child and it sharing genes with a rapist.
We do have to consider the pressure that partners may put on women to make this decision. As such it’s important that women considering abortion are asked appropriate questions by medical staff and are seen to be making an autonomous decision free from external pressure.
Life may begin at conception, but personhood is different. Fertilised eggs produced for IVF are routinely thrown away and this would consistute mass murder if they were all considered living humans.
Although adoption is available, this isn’t an alternative. The attachment a women develops to her baby is likely to grow over time and by childbirth a women is far less likely to give up a baby for adoption than they would have been to go through with abortion, and yet the same economic and social challenges are likely still present. In fact in countries where healthcare is private, the act of childbirth may have exacerbated a woman’s economic difficulties.
A patient refuses treatment for a life-threatening condition. Discuss the ethical issues involved
- It’s important that the patients autonomy be respected here. However, it’s important that the patient’s condition, and full details of the treatments available are provided so that they can make an informed decision.
- Although not an ethical issue, it would also be important to determine whether the patient is competent.
- although respecting the patients autonomy may mean going against the idea of non-maleficence and beneficence. Ultimately if they have been given all the information and are deemed competent, then it’s up to them. forcing them to have the treatment would become a legal issue.
- If they were under 18 things may be different as minors are able to consent to treatment, but aren’t able to refuse it.
A 14 year old asks her GP for the pill, discuss the ethical issues
- safeguarding - is the child being manipulated or abused?
- Gillick competency - is the child competent? if so then it’s not necessary to breach confidentiality.
- it would be important to explain the options available and get more information about the teenagers sexual activity to help reduce the likelihood of issues. it will also allow them to make the most informed decision possible.
- not providing this information may be maleficent as the patient may undergo unprotected sex.
- if the patient appears competent, the beneficent thing to do may be to prescribe the contraception.
- Autonomy - if she’s competent then she can make a decision.
- Justice - she can chose to do what she wants and as long as she’s competent shouldn’t be discriminated against.
- In terms of beneficence though, is there a risk that the patient is being taken advantage of? It would be worth suggesting that she either speak to a parent, or to a service if necessary to be sure this isn’t a safeguarding issue.
Further to this, what effect could being sexually active at this age have on her emotional wellbeing going forwards? - children under 13 aren’t able to consent to sexual relationships. report to child protection lead.
- will not prescribing lead to significant physical or mental health detriments?
A patient diagnosed with HIV reveals to their GP that they haven’t discussed this with their partner
- first: discuss with patient the risks associated with this and try to encourage them to do so.
- considering non-maleficence and justice, it would be permissible for the GP to breach confidentiality in order to inform the partner. Prior to doing so, it would still be necessary to inform the patient that this was going to happen.
- we see patient autonomy at odds with justice, beneficence and non-maleficence here.
- this is a case of beneficence to others versus the impact that this may have on the patient in the future, such as their likelihood of disclosing future issues.
you notice a fellow medical student putting equipment in their bag. when you ask them they say they want to practice clinical skills and that you shouldn’t tell anyone. what should you do?
- consider demeanour when approaching the friend. It’s possible they’ve been given permission to do this (although unlikely).
- may be struggling with clinical skills in which case i could offer to help.
- may be struggling with external issue that i could be supportive about.
- talk to your friend and explain the seriousness of their actions. although it may not seem it, this is an ethical violation as it could result in shortages in supplies and as a result potentially could endanger lives - relevant with pandemic.
- Recommend that they come forward about the incident. Be supportive of any emotional issues that may arise.
- If they refuse to come forward, i would explain that unless they are willing to, i would have to report their behaviour.
What does patient confidentiality mean? when would it be appropriate to breach this?
- Law whereby doctor’s cannot reveal what patients have told them during consultations.
- Vital for the doctor patient relationship. it fosters trust and encourages patients to be more open about things.
- Without it, patients may hold back or avoid seeking treatment at all.
- In order to maintain confidentiality it’s important to be thorough in work. Don’t leave documents lying around at the end of the day, and if discussing things as part of a multidisciplinary team, be sure to do it in a private space, or, do it quietly and share the minimum amount of information necessary.
- its important to mention confidentiality to patients and ensure that they understand what it means, and that information may be shared within the team if necessary in their care.
- if confidentiality is to be breached, it’s essential that the patient is informed.
- its appropriate to breach in cases where justice is involved, such as when a patient has a transmittable disease and refuses to share information that means others are at risk.
- it’s appropriate to breach in multidisciplinary teams so that members of the team are updated on the case.
- in cases of incompetency both in adults and children, sharing of information may be necessary
- In cases of abuse, or when a childs behaviour is putting them or others at risk, information may be shared without consent.
- in cases where breaching confidentiality is being considered, it’s important to double check GMC guidelines as there are lots of grey areas and it’s important that professional duty, not personal beliefs be the deciding factors in decision making.
- had some practice with eric in foodbank. made sure to speak to Sara privately so that what he told me wasn’t overheard.
- shadowing allowed me to hear from numerous consultants how important they consider support networks and hobbies to be in order to mitigate the stress that comes from maintaining confidentiality..
A 13 year old patient reveals to you that they are sexually active and that their parents don’t know, what would you do as a doctor in this situation?
- unless you believe the patient to be incompetent (Gillick), confidentiality must be maintained.
- it would be important to empathise with the patient, to understand what they know about safe sex, whether they’re using protection.
- they could be being taken advantage of, which could be detrimental to their physical and mental health in the future, and so beneficence would suggest that i should encourage them to speak to their parents about being sexually active.
- If it appeared that they were being taken advantage of, non-maleficence may make it acceptable to breach confidentiality in order to follow child protection protocols.
- providing information about safe sex and contraceptive options would also be important.
A depressed patient who has mentioned having suicidal thoughts has refused treatment and you’re concerned about his wellbeing, discuss ethical issues.
- In regards to autonomy, it’s the patients right to refuse treatment. Forcing it upon them is unacceptable.
- If the doctor is concerned, then i would assume empathy has already been applied for the concern to have arisen. however, it would be important once again to empathise with the patient, to understand why they are refusing treatment, and to look for any concerning signs.
- It’s important to ensure the patient has had their options fully explained to them. Although they are refusing treatment, this could be due to a lack of understanding of the nature of their depression and what the different treatments will actually entail.
- If i believed the patient presented a real danger to themselves, then it might be necessary to breach confidentiality in a non-maleficence way. However, this is a decision that shouldn’t be taken lightly as breaching confidentiality could cause a different kind of harm such as damaging the patients trust in doctors leading to a reduction in future openness.
- is the patient competent? psychiatric conditions can result in loss of capacity.
- Is the patient concerned about feeling like a burden? In terms of justice of equality, ensure they know that their problems are as valid as anyone else’s and that they are entitled to treatment.
- Does the patient have dependents? this will influence whether overriding the refusal of psychiatric treatment has more grounds.
Do you think the NHS should fund treatment for smokers?
- ethical principle of justice would suggest yes as doctors have duty to all patients
- sin tax from cigarettes is more effective as the additional revenue will help support treatment. beneficence may support this as a better option.
- it’s also worth considering socio-economic factors. Whether someone smokes is largely influenced by their environment. studies show that the lower classes have more smokers, by not providing treatment, the class gap will be furthered, which isn’t really the way we want society to be moving.
- non-maleficence/ justice, smokers may suffer injury unrelated to smoking, it wouldn’t be fair for them to have different levels of care.
- we have a single payer healthcare system in the NHS which unfortunately isn’t in a position to fund all treatment for all patients, and so a utilitarian approach to resource management makes this an interesting debate. Lung transplant, maybe not, cast for broken wrist, reasonable.
- patient autonomy also states that patients have the option to make their own choices and shouldn’t be punished for this.
- once precedent is set, where do we draw the line? if smoking is considered a lifestyle choice not worthy of receiving treatment, then what happens to people injured from leisure activities or drinking, or how about road accidents?
- smoking related illnesses account for a lot of budget usage, although tax revenue balances this out for the most part from what i’ve read. beyond this, it’s the governments responsibility to ensure those tax revenues go where they should.
What would you do if you saw a colleague making a mistake with a patients medicine?
- approach them empathetically, and in private and suggest that i believe there may have been a mistake with the patients medication.
- hopefully we could determine if this is the case.
- it would be worth checking that everything is ok with my colleague at this point. patient care is vital and this could have been a lapse in concentration, or it may have resulted from distraction due to greater problems. Being supportive will allow this to be determined, and will allow me to offer help if necessary.
- the mistake has to be reported as per GMC guidelines, so it would then be important to encourage my colleague to report the issue, and state that if not, i will have to do it myself. Be clear that this isn’t a personal attack, but is a matter of patient safety and following guidelines.
- we want to foster an environment of teamwork and support, this is why it[s important to be empathetic and give the colleague opportunity to report the mistake themselves.
Is it ever ethically acceptable for NHS doctors to go on strike?
- the kantians among us would most likely say no, and that this is a black and white issue.
- consequentialism however, would suggest that in some cases, yes it is.
- as we saw with the junior doctor strikes, sometimes doctors feel that they are being overworked, and if the consequences of this are that they underperform and may cause harm to patients, then removing themselves from the situation in order to address the cause is acceptable in my opinion.
- This falls under non-maleficence. The doctors felt that they were in a position where they may do harm due to external factors and had to take action to change this.
- Now if the situation was that doctors were on strike because they wanted free parking at their hospitals then perhaps not. my point here being that this is a nuanced discussion.
- In terms of autonomy, it is also a doctors choice to practice. We don’t live in a caste system and no one is forced to be a doctor, so again, if they are making decisions in order to prevent harming patients, then it’s their right to do so.
You are a GP and a patient confides in you that they are using illicit drugs, what should you do?
- empathise with the patient first and foremost. Understand how regularly they are, if they feel addiction is an issue, if they know of any underlying causes for their substance misuse.
- have a frank but not judgemental discussion with them about the dangers of their behaviour in the short and long term.
- provide information about drug cessation and mental health services, and, if necessary provide a referral.
- in terms of immediate care, ascertain whether the patient is experiencing any adverse health effects, and provide treatment for these.
- confidentiality: breachable if it’s deemed necessary to speak to the police or social services (patient or someone else must be in direct danger because of the drug use).
Should vaccination of children be mandatory?
- tough question
- vaccinations are no doubt important, and the more people who are vaccinated, the quicker, or more easily we will reach a state of herd immunity.
- we know from wakefield scandal that when childhood vaccinations drop, there is a rise in infection rates. unfortunately we’ve seen that our ‘measles free’ status has been rescinded as those that would have been children around the time of the wakefield scandal are now university age, and there has been a breakout of cases in universities.
- Unfortunately, there is an abundance of false information surrounding vaccinations online, and group polarisation and confirmation bias only serve to worsen the issues. there are claims that vaccines are toxic.
- Unfortunately we have seen a rise in anti-vax group popularity during the pandemic. Labour have even propose a new law the tackle the spread of fake anti-vax news.
- our best hopes are to promote more vaccine education.
- making them mandatory could create social problems and it’s taking away patient autonomy which could create friction and mistrust in the NHS.
- We have to consider as well that vaccinations efficacy or side effects are likely to come under the shape of a normal distribution. Although most will benefit from their vaccination, some will have side effects, and if someone forced to have a vaccine happens to have an adverse reaction, this could create a scandal.
- lack of evidence that mandatory vaccination actually increases uptake despite reducing public trust.
- Because vaccines reduce prevalence of horrible diseases, they’re no longer seen first hand, therefore parents may be misguided in their understanding of how bad the alternative is compared to the possible side effects of the vaccine.
- research suggests that empathising with concerned parents and allowing them to talk through their concerns with a trusted healthcare professional is one of the best methods.
- Allowing childhood vaccinations to occur at school is important though as research has shown that low uptake is influenced by difficulties in getting to appointments. This also reduces the burden on the NHS as multiple vaccinations can be taken care of in a day rather than many appointments being taken up by people needing vaccines.
- we do know that the WHO declared the UK to be measles free in 2017. Unfortunately by 2019 we lost this status. it appears that the reduction in vaccines that followed the wakefield scandal has now seen a rise in measles cases within universities (those babies are now at that age).
- I know that the NHS plan to improve coordination and support in low uptake areas as well as adding MMR checks for children aged 10-11 as well as attempting to catch-up young adults who missed the vaccinations as children.
How much does a mountain weigh?
- can you tell me the radius of the base? and the height? 1/3 pi r squared from these gives volume
- can you tell me what material the mountain is made from? density = mass/ volume. if i know the material, i can find the density and calculate the mass.
- now that i’ve got the mass, can you tell me what planet the mountain is on? or at least, what the value of gravitational acceleration is on that planet?
how different would the world be if the wheel wasn’t invented?
- very different.
- transportation would exist, except for things like dog sleds in snow covered areas.
- cogs and gears wouldn’t exist and so we most likely wouldn’t have accurate methods of tracking the time
- gyroscopes wouldn’t exist, these are necessary for most smartphones
- we wouldn’t have CD’s, DVD’s, Vinyl
- hydroelectric power couldn’t be generated
- shopping and manual labour tasks would be a lot harder as we wouldn’t have trollies or wheelbarrows.
- disabled people would be at a major disadvantage as wheelchairs wouldn’t exist .
- culture would be wildly different, we wouldn’t have sporting events like formula 1 or tour de france.
- skiing resorts wouldn’t exist as gondolas require wheels in their mechanisms.
How many words are there in an average book?
- depends on what type of book. the average nursery book will have significantly less than the average legal manuscript.
- further to this, the verbosity of the book would be a factor. A book with lots of long words will have less words per page than a book with more rudimentary language, and so i’d need a bit more information from just page length.
- once some of this has been cleared up, let’s say the ‘average book’ type we’re considering is 300 pages long, with 20 lines of text per page. that would be 6000 lines of text.
- if each line has 10 words, we have 60,000 words. However, some pages like the title page, the contents, the dedication, pages at the start and end of chapters, would have less words, and so a conservative estimate would be around 58000.
To what extent do you think fear is beneficial?
- it’s an evolutionary response to help us avoid dangerous situations.
- Without fear, people might wander off the edge of buildings.
- It’s also allows us to connect. Empathising with other peoples fears brings us closer as a species.
- unfortunately there are negatives of fear, but by understanding these we can try and turn them into positives. Considering patient care, fear may lead to apprehension. By being empathetic about this, we are able to reassure patients, help them disclose information and foster better relations with them.
- Overcoming fears allows people to grow.
- fear can give us social cues. being afraid of rejection can lead to social cohesion. and feeling apprehensive about saying or doing something can lead people to act more favourably.
why do we wear shoes?
- protect our feet against the environment.
- protect our feet against soil living parasites.
- culture
- societal norms - conformity.
- expression of individuality
- to allow us to perform certain activities i.e. ski boots, running shoes have extra cushioning.
if you were stranded in a remote rainforest and trying to escape, who is one person you would want to accompany you and why?
- ideally a native of the rainforest.
- if that wasn’t an option, then my friend dan.
- he’s a level 3 certified mountaineer. he’s trained in back country navigation techniques, how to make makeshift repelling equipment, he’s a licensed paramedic, and is exceptionally fit.
- further to this, we are close friends. We first bonded over our mutual appreciation of music (specifically blur), and have taken numerous trips together where for 5 hours drives the conversation doesn’t stop. We can be discussing skiing, music, philosophy.
- He also spent a year working a forest tour guide in Canada.