Interventions to promote Mental Health Flashcards

1
Q

Define what is meant by Mental Health.

A
  • a state of well-being in which the individual realizes his or her own abilities, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to his or her community (WHO, 2001).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the difference between Mental health promotion and mental illness promotion.

A
  • WHO (2005)
  • Have overlapping aims.
  • often, mental health promotion are also relevant to mental health illness prevention.
  • the scope for promotion is wider:
  • Target of intervention (quality of life, employment, relationships, communities)
    Target audience (those ‘at risk’, certain age groups, general population).

Requires action across many different areas (income, housing, transport, communities, employment, volunteering, education, consumer affairs, arts, sport, media, health and social care…).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe the benefits of mental health promotion.

A
  • strengthens individuals - increases emotional resilience through interventions designed to promote self-esteem, life and coping skills, eg., communicating and relationship skills.
  • strengthens communities - increases social inclusion and participation.
    improves neighbourhood environments, developing a range of interventions which support mental health for people of all ages, e.g., anti-bullying strategies at school.
  • reduces “structural barriers” to mental health- tackles societal structures through initiatives to reduce discrimination and inequalities to promote access to education, meaningful employment, housing, services and support for vulnerable people.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain why mental health promotion is important?

A
  • ‘Health professionals and health planners are often too preoccupied with the immediate problems of those who have a disease to be able to pay attention to needs of those who are “well”’ (WHO, 2005)
  • mental health has intrinsic value to society:
  • Essential for wellbeing and quality of life
  • Important for functioning
  • Contributes to all aspects of human life (relationships, physical health, social cohesion, productivity, employability, earning potential, education attainment, home life, crime reduction)
  • Reducing/ preventing mental illness
  • preventing suffering
  • potentially very cost effective as mental illness costs are expensive
    -estimated at £105.2 billion per year in 2010 (Centre for Mental Health, 2010)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the impacts of better mental health (Keyes (2005)).

A
  • compared to flourishing adults, moderately mentally health and languishing have:
  • psycho-social impairment (e.g. poorer relationships)
    physical health (e.g. more cardiovascular disease)
    productivity (e.g. missed days at work)
  • this is correlational.
  • there is longer term evidence ((e.g. Schotanus-Dijkstra et al., 2017; Lyubomirsky et al 2005)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Identify potential target groups for interventions to promote mental health.

A
  • Children and adolescents
  • parents of young children
  • older individuals
  • individuals that have experienced trauma
  • general population
  • those more at risk due to socio-economic factors or environmental factors
    -individuals who already have a mental illness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Children and Adolescents (interventions)

A
  • mental illness usually begins in childhood and adolescents (Kessler et al., 2007).
  • there’s a difference in the development between the cognitive and emotional aspects of the brain (Steinberg, 2005).
  • this is a time of remarkable turbulence and instability (Harrop and Trower, 2001)

-Friendship groups
- School environment
- Level of independence
- Dynamic with parents/guardians

  • Long lasting negative impact of a mental illness AND long lasting positive impact of mental health
  • independence away from parents/guardians
  • educational attainment
  • development of peer support networks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe Keyes’ (2006) study

A
  • Flourishing was most common group in 12-14 year olds.
  • Moderate mental health was most common group in 15-18 year olds.
  • Adolescents without mental illness were not necessarily mentally healthy.
  • Flourishing adolescents were found to be functioning better than moderately mentally healthy or languishing adolescents.

As measures of mental health increased:
Conduct problems decreased (arrests, truancy, alcohol, tobacco and marijuana use).

Psychosocial functioning increased (self determination, closeness to others and school integration).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Older individuals and interventions

A

threats to mental health in older individuals involve:
Age discrimination
Barriers to participation in meaningful activities
Social isolation
Poorer physical health
Poverty

‘It is widely acknowledged that the mental health and well-being of older people has been neglected across the spectrum of promotion, prevention and treatment services’ (National Institute for Mental Health, 2005)

Promoting mental health in older individuals can (Age Concern & the Mental Health Foundation, 2006):
… benefit each of us personally
… benefit society by maximising the contributions that older people can make
… benefit society by minimising costs of care related to poor mental health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define what is meant by Socio-economic factors.

A
  • APA: ‘The social standing or class of an individual or group. It is often measured as a combination of education, income and occupation’.

Socio-economic factors involve income, educational attainment, and financial security, as well as subjective perceptions of social status and social class.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Socio-economic and environmental factors (interventions)

A

‘Examinations of socioeconomic status often reveal inequities in access to resources, plus issues related to privilege, power and control’.

Related to the opportunities and privileges afforded to people within society thus highly relevant to health inequalities.

Lower SES status is associated with poorer health outcomes (Marmot, 2020) including mental health (Hoebel et al., 2017; Macintyre et al., 2018).

Effective interventions to reduce the effects of poverty and inequality on mental health at the individual/family level exist, but less evidence regarding community based interventions and policy level interventions (Wahlbeck et al., 2017).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Individuals who already have a mental illness and interventions.

A
  • Usually with non-clinical groups, but not always.

Confidence, self esteem, hopefulness and social integration can influence clinical and quality of life outcomes for people with mental illnesses.

Social Exclusion Unit 2004;
Adults with mental health problems are one of the most excluded groups in society.

This is often caused by stigma and discrimination.

Two-thirds of men under the age of 35 with mental health problems who die by suicide are unemployed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The general population and interventions

A

Just 18% of US adults are ‘flourishing’, suggesting over 80% of population may benefit from increased mental health (Keyes, 2005).

In Scotland, 14% of adults have ‘good mental wellbeing’, 73% have average, and 14% have poor mental wellbeing (Braunholtz et al 2007).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe Early Life and School approaches (Macro level interventions; meso and micro interventions).

A

Meilstrup et al (2020).
Aim: to investigate socio-economic status, emotional symptoms, self-efficacy and social competence.

Participants: 3969 adolescents aged 11-15
Design: Cross-sectional.

Results: Lower SES adolescents had higher rates of emotional symptoms and lower levels of self-efficacy and social competence.

High self-efficacy and high social competence buffer the association between SES and emotional symptoms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is meant by self-efficacy?

A
  • self-efficacy describes a person’s belief in their ability to succeed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the methodology of the Perry Preschool Project.

A
  • developed by school Charles Eugene Beatty and psychologist David Weikart in 1962.
  • Goal: To improve disadvantaged children’s capacity for future success in school and in life by promoting young children’s intellectual, social, and physical development.

Participants: 123 African American preschool children ages 3–4 who were living in poverty and assessed to be at high risk for school failure. 58 were entered into the preschool programme.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe the programme components of the Perry Preschool Project.

A
  • For one year a daily 2½-hour classroom session and a weekly 1½-hour home visit for each child.
  • Children’s cognitive and social skills are built and supported through individualized teaching and learning.
  • A key feature of the curriculum is active learning, in which children are supported to initiate their own play and activities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Describe the results of The Perry Preschool Project with the children at age 27.

A

By age 27, the children who had experienced the programme (Schweinhart & Weikart, 1993):
Completed more schooling
Committed fewer crimes
Had higher rates of employment
Earned a higher income

By age 27, financially the programme had achieved a return of $7.16 for every dollar invested. Financial benefits were mainly accrued in the form of decreased welfare and criminal justice costs and higher earnings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe the results of The Perry Preschool Project with the children at age 40.

A

Had fewer teenage pregnancies.
Were more likely to have graduated from high school.
Were more likely to hold a job and have higher earnings.
Committed fewer crimes
Were more likely to have their own home and car.
By age 27, financially the programme had achieved a return of more than $17 for every dollar invested.

(Schweinhart et al., 2005)

20
Q

Explain the limitations of the school approaches.

A

‘there is still a need for a stronger and broader evidence base in the field of mental health promotion, which should focus on both universal work and targeted approaches to fully address mental health in our young populations’ (O’Reilly et al. 2018)

  • Quality of evidence has been appraised as generally low-to-moderate with many studies having considerable methodological issues.
  • Most studies tend to be short-term with little long-term follow-up.
  • Gaps in teacher training and support can create problems with programme delivery.
  • Whole-school approaches which involve different levels of school personnel, wider communities, and other agencies and last for at least a year tend to me most successful.
  • School based interventions are unlikely to be enough in areas of multiple deprivation: whole community approaches needed to strengthen psychological resources, support and opportunities (Holton, 2007).
21
Q

Describe the workplace approach (Macro level interventions; meso and micro interventions).

A
  • Workplaces are a good setting for interventions - Most adults of working age are in employment, so potential coverage is high.

In Wales, costs associated with poor mental health in the workplace = nearly to £1.2 billion a year (Friedli & Parsonage, 2009)
sickness absence
reduced productivity
increased staff turnover

Interventions in the workplace:
Increase recognition of employers that mental health of employees is important.

Prevent mental health problems which are directly work related.

Conduct awareness training for line managers and ‘mental health first aiders’.

Offer better access to help.

Offer effective rehabilitation for individuals who need to take time off.

22
Q

Outline the aim and intervention used in the McElligott et al (2010) study.

A

Aim: to examine the effect of a holistic programme and the development of a self-care plan on health-promoting behaviours in hospital nurses.

Intervention: the Collaborative Care Model (CCM) Programme plus a self-care plan.

CCM is an 8 hour programme created to promote a culture of caring, focusing on relationships and patient-centered care, fostering and sustaining a healing environment and a culture of safety.

23
Q

Describe the method and results of McElligott et al (2010) study.

A

Method: Measures taken before and after the intervention and compared to a control group.

Results: Intervention group had higher over all health scores after the intervention, including spirituality (e.g. I believe that my life has a purpose), interpersonal relations (e.g. I maintain meaningful and fulfilling relationships with others), and nutrition scores (e.g. I limit use of sugars and food containing sugar)

24
Q

Evaluate the effectiveness of the workplace interventions (Brand et al. 2017) (outline).

A

Whole-system approaches to improving the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers: a systematic review (Brand et al. 2017)

Healthcare professionals report high levels of sickness absence, dissatisfaction, distress, and “burnout” at work.

‘Whole system’ approaches have been suggested as a successful method for improving staff wellbeing. These involve identification and response to local need, engagement of staff at all levels, and involvement and training of management.

25
Q

Describe the method and results of Brand et al., 2017.

A
  • Method: Systematic review of 11 studies to assess interventions which used a whole system approach to improving the health and wellbeing of health care workers.

Results: All studies at least partly effective. Involvement and clear leadership of management, and flexible interventions to encourage employee engagement were particularly important for the success of interventions.

26
Q

What is meant by macro interventions?

A
  • large scale
  • e.g., public health campaigns.
27
Q

What is meant by meso interventions?

A
  • specific communities.
28
Q

What is meant by micro interventions?

A
  • person-centred, individual based.
29
Q

Does more money make us happy?

A

Expected happiness highest around an envisioned win of 10 million pounds (Haesevoets et al., 2023).

Lottery winners not happier than non-lottery winners (Brickman et al. 1978).

‘Having access to the best things in life may actually undercut people’s ability to reap enjoyment from life’s small pleasures’ (Quoidbach et al., 2010).

Focusing on time leads to greater happiness than focusing on money HOWEVER Spending money on others and on experiences versus possessions increases happiness (Mogilner & Norton, 2016).

30
Q

Does spending more time with friends make us happy?

A

Number of friends correlated with subjective well-being even after controlling for income, demographic variables and personality differences (Helliwell & Huang, 2013).

People more central to a network of friends are more likely to become happy in the future (Fowler & Christakis, 2008).

31
Q

Does spending more time with family make us happy?

A

10-year study (North et al., 2008)
Family social support showed a substantial, positive association with concurrent happiness, even after controlling for income.

Change in family social support positively related to change in happiness; increased support = increase happiness, decreased support = decreased happiness.

32
Q

Does success make us happy?

A
  • Longitudinal research; review found happiness is associated with and precedes numerous successful outcomes (Lyubomirsky et al., 2005).
33
Q

Lai, S. T., & O’Carroll, R. E. (2017) (Gratitude practice)

A

RCT design with two conditions; gratitude or no-assigned activity.

108 participants aged 18-36.

Gratitude condition showed greater increases in state gratitude and positive affect, relative to the control condition, who reported a reduction in wellbeing.

34
Q

Al-Seheel & Noor (2016) (Gratitude practice)

A

RCT design with three conditions; Islamic-based expressive gratitude, secular-based expressive gratitude, control (attending to details of daily life).

60 participants; Muslim students
Results suggested that the Islamic-based gratitude is beneficial in raising participants’ happiness level, as it fits with their beliefs and values.

35
Q

Komase et al. (2021) (Gratitude practice)

A

Systematic review focusing on workers’ mental health and well-being.

Gratitude list interventions showed significant improvement in perceived stress and depression; effects on well-being were inconsistent.

Interventions with gratitude list four times or less did not report significant changes

36
Q

Li et al. (2022) (Exercise)

A

Pre-post design.

864 college students (33.5% female) took part in survey, 29 female participants took part in exercise intervention.

Beneficial effects of the intervention for both sleep and fatigue outcomes.

37
Q

Worobetz et al. (2020) (exercise)

A

Pre-post design.
‘MED-WELL’ programme; six-week programme of weekly 1-hour sessions.

26% (74/286 students) participated in the programme, 69 students attended one or more sessions and completed questionnaires at baseline and at follow-up.

Improvement in well-being, sleep, loneliness, and physical activity.

38
Q

Bonhauser et al (2005) (exercise)

A

Controlled trial (non-RCT) of a school-based physical activity program.

198 low SES students aged 15 years old, 2 classes intervention, 2 classes control.

Anxiety and self-esteem improved. No significant change in depressive score. Participation and compliance with the program was >80%.

39
Q

Russell et al (2021) (Journaling)

A

Pilot RCT with two conditions (journal or no journal).

100 NICU parents.

Improvement in anxiety but not depression, high uptake of journalling and positive feedback.

40
Q

MacIsaac et al. (2022) (Journaling)

A

Pre-post design, with app-based, positively focused self-reflection writing prompts.

152 participants.

Journaling associated with improvements in psychological wellbeing but only when baseline self-reflection was average or higher.

41
Q

Smyth et al (2018) (Journaling)

A

RCT, 12-week Web-based Positive Affect Journaling (journaling positively about an experience). Two conditions (PAJ or usual care).

70 adults with various medical conditions and elevated anxiety symptoms.

Moderate sustained adherence from participants, improved mental distress, well-being, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and greater resilience.

42
Q

Describe the RCT design type (Randomised Controlled Trial).

A

Randomised controlled trial.

Considered the ‘gold standard’ of intervention trial designs.

Minimises bias;
If initial participant pool is large enough the two groups should be roughly equal; confounders are distributed equally.

Randomisation stops participants being entered into a condition based on researcher or participant preference; reduces selection bias.

Selection bias; when the intervention group does not accurately reflect the population.

43
Q

What should a RCT contain?

A

Ideally, should contain three elements:
Randomisation (participants chosen at random for each condition).

Preordained outcome measures (so researchers can’t cherry pick their results)
Blinding (researchers/ participants don’t know who is in which condition, to minimise bias).

44
Q

What is a Non-randomised controlled trial?

A

Also sometimes called non-randomized comparative study or trial, nonrandomized intervention, quasi-experimental trial or study, or non-equivalent control group designs.

Study utilises intervention and control/comparison group, but participants are not randomised into these.

Useful when randomisation is not possible (e.g. comparing two groups for example the impact of exercise in individuals with and without psychosis).

45
Q

What is a pre-post trial?

A
  • Also called before and after study,
    Measures are taking before and after the intervention.
  • Generally, no control or comparison group (although not always the case).

-Easier to implement than RCTs and non-RCTs as no control/comparison group.

  • Useful for if not providing the intervention would be considered unethical.
  • Generally no control or comparison group (although not always the case – IN WHICH CASE BASICALLY BECOMES NON-RANDOMISED TRIAL).