Interpreting a Will Flashcards
re: construing a will
what does this mean?
establishing entitlement under a will
re: construing a will
what will the court look at when determining T’s intention?
When determining T’s intention, the court will do the following:
o Look at the will as a whole
o Apply the two rebuttable presumptions
o Consider common sense
o Context at the time i.e. facts known/assumed by T
re: construing a will
will courts consider evidence when determining T’s intention?
Generally, the courts will not consider evidence in determining T’s intention, but it is permitted in relation to a part of a will where the wording is:
o Meaningless;
o Ambiguous on the face of it; or
o Ambiguous in the circumstances based on evidence other than evidence of T’s intention
re: construing a will
when will the courts consider evidence to establish intention?
in relation to a part of a will where the wording is:
o Meaningless;
o Ambiguous on the face of it; or
o Ambiguous in the circumstances based on evidence other than evidence of T’s intention
re: construing a will
if evidence is considered, how is it used?
- Evidence can only be used to aid interpretation, not re-write the will
re: construing a will
when will a gift fail?
- If the meaning is unclear, the gift(s) will fail for uncertainty
re: construing a will
what rebuttable presumptions apply when the court is discerning T’s intention?
what can the court not do?
The court applies two rebuttable presumptions when discerning T’s intention:
1. Non-technical words bear their ordinary meaning
2. Technical words are given their technical meaning
The court cannot invent different meanings
re: construing a will
explain the presumption ‘non-technical words bear their ordinary meaning’
o If a word has more than 1 meaning, then the court has to try to determine T’s intention by looking at the will as a whole i.e. does money inc. coins?
re: construing a will
give an example re: ‘technical words are given their technical meaning’
‘personal’ has been determined to mean ‘personalty’, not ‘realty’.
re: construing a will
when can the presumptions be rebutted?
- Can be rebutted by the will itself and any admissible extrinsic evidence if it is a clear T intended for the word to have a different meaning
re: construing a will
what is meant by rectification?
The court cannot rewrite a will, but it can rectify a will where T’s intentions are clear, but the wording does not carry them into effect due:
o Clerical error (i.e. writing/omitting something by mistake); or
o Failure to understand T’s instructions
re: construing a will
when will a court rectify a will?
where the wording does not carry them into effect due to:
o Clerical error (i.e. writing/omitting something by mistake); or
o Failure to understand T’s instructions
re: construing a will
give examples where a will could not be rectified
o Solicitor misunderstood the law
o Solicitor thought the words achieved the desired outcome but they did no
re: construing a will
to what extent can a will be rectified?
- A will can only be rectified to the extent of T’s intentions. It cannot be rectified to include something T never thought about.
re: will property
what is the rule?
the will speaks from the date of death
o In other words, you are looking the property they own at the time of death, not when the will was made.
re: will property
what is the exception to the general rule?
give examples
if there are words as evidence to the contrary in the will, i.e.:
o Words suggesting the present i.e. ‘the house I own now’ execution
o ‘my’ when referring to a specific asset execution
o ‘my’ when referring to a generic asset i.e. ‘my collection of cars’ death
re: beneficiaries
when do these provisions apply?
- This only applies where Bs are described, rather than specifically named
re: beneficiaries
what is the rule?
The will speaks from the date of execution, unless there is evidence to the contrary in the will
i.e. the will is to be distributed in accordance with those who satisfied the description at the time the will was made, not death.
re: beneficiaries
what is the position regarding descriptions of families i.e. ‘my children’?
Descriptions of family (i.e. ‘my children’) will be taken as blood relations unless the will suggests otherwise
re: beneficiaries
what is the position regarding adopted children?
o Adopted children are treated as the child of their adoptive parents, not their natural parents (unless they acquire an interest prior to adoption), unless the will suggests otherwise
re: beneficiaries
explain the position with descriptions as husband/wife/civl partner
- The terms ‘husband/wife’ and civil partner are not synonymous
o i.e. if a gift is left to a ‘wife’, but they are CPs it will fail
re: gender recognition
when do these provisions apply?
- This applies where Bs are not named and the person has obtained a full gender recognition certificate (GRC)
re: gender recognition
what is the position if the will was made before 4 April 2005?
in effect, the GRC is ignored. The property passes to Bs in accordance with their gender at the time the will was executed.
re: gender recognition
what is the position if the will was made after 4 April 2005?
property passes to Bs in accordance with their GRC at the date of T’s death.
re: gender recognition
when can someone apply to the High Court?
- Where the will is made on or after 4 April 2005 and a person is no longer due to inherit because of their GRC, they can make apply to the High Court
re: gender recognition
what power does the High Court have?
The court has wide direction to make an order where it is just to do so, i.e.: lump sum payment, transfer of property
re: gender recognition
what are PRs duties in this regard?
- PRs do not have a duty to enquire into whether a GRC has been issued or revoked and they are not liable to any person if the PRs did not make such enquiries (so long as they didn’t know about the status of the GRC)
re: gender recognition
what other equitable options are available in this instance?
- A person can still follow property into the hands of another unless it was purchased for value in good faith and without notice
re: failure of gifts
what happens if a gift fails?
it becomes part of residuary estate
re: failure of gifts
what happens if a residuary gift fails?
partial intestacy and passes under intestacy rules
re: failure of gifts
why might a gift fail?
- uncertainty
- B was a witness
- divorce or dissolution
- ademption
- doctrine of lapse
- disclaimer
- forfeiture rule
re: failure of gifts
explain uncertainty
- If the subject matter or recipient of the gift is not clear, the courts will look at the wording of the will to discern T’s intention and use rectification, if possible.
- If this cannot be determined, the gift will fail for uncertainty.
re: failure of gifts
what is the exception to the uncertainty rule?
gifts to charity which don’t sufficiently identify the charity will not fail if it is exclusively for charitable purposes. The court will elect the charity.
re: failure of gifts
explain Bs as W to a will
if B or their spouse/CP witnesses a will, any gift to B will fail
This only applies to Bs and spouse/CPs married at the time of execution
re: failure of gifts
when will a gift to B not fail where they are a W
the gift will not fail if:
o The will was validly executed without B’s/their spouse/CPs signature i.e. if there are 3 witnesses to the will and 1 was a B.
o There is a codicil which confirms the original will was not witnesses by B or their spouse/CP
re: failure of gifts
explain divorce / dissolution
- Where a gift is made to a spouse/CP and the marriage/CP is later dissolved, annulled or declared void, the gift will fail
re: failure of gifts
explain ademption
- a specific legacy fails (i.e. adeems) if T no longer owns it at death i.e. the asset may have been sold, given away or destroyed