Interpretative Approaches/Word Tools Flashcards

1
Q

Noscitor a sociis

A

“It is known by the company it keeps”.

The meaning of words are coloured by other words in the same section.

Say: “the context creates a coloured definition of..” or “the words xyz colour the definition of x to mean…”. Use when there is a list of nouns or adjectives and one term/phrase/word is different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ejusdem generis

A

“Of the same kind”. The context may override the ordinary meaning of a very wide word by creating a class.

Say: “the words form a restricted class”. Use when there is a list of specific words followed by a general word(s). Eg. “Any person” or “any thing”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How to use ejusdem generis

A
  • identify the catch-all (specific words followed by a general term)
  • create a class (as narrow as possible)
  • show that the class is inexhaustible
  • not to be used if it will defeat the purpose
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Expresso unio

A

“The expression of one thing is the exclusion of another”
Quite literal approach
Eg. Kids under 10 are free -> implies anyone over 10 must pay
Look for wide catch all terms following specific ones that can be limited by reference to the specific ones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Literal Approach

A

Words should be interpreted in their literal meaning. Commonly used by prosecution to try and widen the interpretation of provisions to capture the act of the defendant. Sometimes defence can use literal approach if something will lead to absurdities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Purposive approach

A

Used by both defence and prosecution when the other parties argument is inconsistent with the purpose of the Act itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Golden approach

A

Begin with the literal/ordinary approach; if that creates an inconsistency/contradiction of the purpose of the Act, or leads to absurdities in practice, then the meanings of the words can be modified. “Defence will argue that if the courts were to prefer the pros definition, this could lead to absurdities…”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Intrinsic Aids

A
  • Long title or purpose section
  • Headings
  • Act as a whole
  • Explanatory note or preamble
  • Definition/Interpretation section (definitions given within a statute override the ordinary meanings of terms)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Extrinsic Aids

A
  • Legislative history/amendments
  • Hansard
  • Other relevant legislation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Difference between “Includes” and “means”

A

Includes is Non-exhaustive and means is Exhaustive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Difference between “and” + “or”

A

and means both “X” and “Y” must be fulfilled “or” means either “X” or “Y” can be fulfilled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Difference between “shall” and “may”

A

“shall” is mandatory, “may” is directory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly